Comparison of two approaches for determining fire dates from tree scars ( ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa) .

M. H. Madany, Thomas Swetnam, N. E. West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Occurrence of missing or false rings presents an obstacle to accurate dating of individual fires. Two different techniques of dating partial cross sections of fire-scarred ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa were compared using the same samples. Method I involves the tabulation of 'raw' dates followed by a subsequent adjustment based on synchronization with fire dates from adjacent trees. Method II uses correlations with master chronologies based on analysis of increment cores taken in the same region as the sampled fire scar sections. Method I is prone to error since the assumption that fire dates differing by a few years may actually be from the same year cannot be independently verified. Method II provides a higher degree of certainty with regard to the accuracy of individual dates because the cross dating of local patterns of ring widths circumvents the problem of absent or false rings. -from Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)856-861
Number of pages6
JournalForest Science
Volume28
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pinus ponderosa
fire scars
methodology
chronology
cross section
comparison
method
dating
sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Comparison of two approaches for determining fire dates from tree scars ( ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa) . / Madany, M. H.; Swetnam, Thomas; West, N. E.

In: Forest Science, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1982, p. 856-861.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5606d7ae45ee4585968a02832eba76af,
title = "Comparison of two approaches for determining fire dates from tree scars ( ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa) .",
abstract = "Occurrence of missing or false rings presents an obstacle to accurate dating of individual fires. Two different techniques of dating partial cross sections of fire-scarred ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa were compared using the same samples. Method I involves the tabulation of 'raw' dates followed by a subsequent adjustment based on synchronization with fire dates from adjacent trees. Method II uses correlations with master chronologies based on analysis of increment cores taken in the same region as the sampled fire scar sections. Method I is prone to error since the assumption that fire dates differing by a few years may actually be from the same year cannot be independently verified. Method II provides a higher degree of certainty with regard to the accuracy of individual dates because the cross dating of local patterns of ring widths circumvents the problem of absent or false rings. -from Authors",
author = "Madany, {M. H.} and Thomas Swetnam and West, {N. E.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "856--861",
journal = "Forest Science",
issn = "0015-749X",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two approaches for determining fire dates from tree scars ( ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa) .

AU - Madany, M. H.

AU - Swetnam, Thomas

AU - West, N. E.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Occurrence of missing or false rings presents an obstacle to accurate dating of individual fires. Two different techniques of dating partial cross sections of fire-scarred ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa were compared using the same samples. Method I involves the tabulation of 'raw' dates followed by a subsequent adjustment based on synchronization with fire dates from adjacent trees. Method II uses correlations with master chronologies based on analysis of increment cores taken in the same region as the sampled fire scar sections. Method I is prone to error since the assumption that fire dates differing by a few years may actually be from the same year cannot be independently verified. Method II provides a higher degree of certainty with regard to the accuracy of individual dates because the cross dating of local patterns of ring widths circumvents the problem of absent or false rings. -from Authors

AB - Occurrence of missing or false rings presents an obstacle to accurate dating of individual fires. Two different techniques of dating partial cross sections of fire-scarred ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa were compared using the same samples. Method I involves the tabulation of 'raw' dates followed by a subsequent adjustment based on synchronization with fire dates from adjacent trees. Method II uses correlations with master chronologies based on analysis of increment cores taken in the same region as the sampled fire scar sections. Method I is prone to error since the assumption that fire dates differing by a few years may actually be from the same year cannot be independently verified. Method II provides a higher degree of certainty with regard to the accuracy of individual dates because the cross dating of local patterns of ring widths circumvents the problem of absent or false rings. -from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020389053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020389053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 856

EP - 861

JO - Forest Science

JF - Forest Science

SN - 0015-749X

IS - 4

ER -