Comparison of Unsteady and Quasi-Unsteady Flow Models in Simulating Sediment Transport in an Ephemeral Arizona Stream

Ryan Hummel, Guohong Duan, Shiyan Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hydrodynamic and sediment transport models are useful engineering tools for predicting unsteady flood flow and sediment transport. Many models such as HEC-RAS, HEC-6, and IALLUVIAL apply quasi-unsteady flow model, whereas others apply the unsteady flow model. It remains unknown if a quasi-unsteady flow model is sufficiently accurate for simulating sediment transport in rapidly varied unsteady flood events, especially in ephemeral rivers in arid and semiarid regions. This study compared the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS 4.1 model with one-dimensional (1D) Finite Volume Method (FVM) based model in simulating flood flow and sediment transport in the Pantano Wash, a dryland river in the state of Arizona. The objective is to determine which sediment transport method is appropriate in predicting bed elevation changes in an ephemeral stream, Pantano Wash, and if an unsteady model is more accurate than a quasi-unsteady flow model in predicting sediment transport. Results showed that the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS model and the 1D FVM yielded similar results of bed degradation and aggradation for this dryland stream, although the FVM model predicted better flood hydrographs. Among the seven sediment transport formulas embedded in HEC-RAS, Yang's and Engelund-Hansen's equations gave the best matches with the field measurements for this particular case study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)987-998
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Water Resources Association
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

ephemeral stream
unsteady flow
sediment transport
finite volume method
comparison
aggradation
hydrograph
semiarid region
arid region
river
hydrodynamics

Keywords

  • Dryland rivers
  • Finite volume method
  • Sediment transport
  • Sediment transport model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Ecology

Cite this

Comparison of Unsteady and Quasi-Unsteady Flow Models in Simulating Sediment Transport in an Ephemeral Arizona Stream. / Hummel, Ryan; Duan, Guohong; Zhang, Shiyan.

In: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 48, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 987-998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{deaa546aee734d938f8d661c0e5d6a90,
title = "Comparison of Unsteady and Quasi-Unsteady Flow Models in Simulating Sediment Transport in an Ephemeral Arizona Stream",
abstract = "Hydrodynamic and sediment transport models are useful engineering tools for predicting unsteady flood flow and sediment transport. Many models such as HEC-RAS, HEC-6, and IALLUVIAL apply quasi-unsteady flow model, whereas others apply the unsteady flow model. It remains unknown if a quasi-unsteady flow model is sufficiently accurate for simulating sediment transport in rapidly varied unsteady flood events, especially in ephemeral rivers in arid and semiarid regions. This study compared the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS 4.1 model with one-dimensional (1D) Finite Volume Method (FVM) based model in simulating flood flow and sediment transport in the Pantano Wash, a dryland river in the state of Arizona. The objective is to determine which sediment transport method is appropriate in predicting bed elevation changes in an ephemeral stream, Pantano Wash, and if an unsteady model is more accurate than a quasi-unsteady flow model in predicting sediment transport. Results showed that the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS model and the 1D FVM yielded similar results of bed degradation and aggradation for this dryland stream, although the FVM model predicted better flood hydrographs. Among the seven sediment transport formulas embedded in HEC-RAS, Yang's and Engelund-Hansen's equations gave the best matches with the field measurements for this particular case study.",
keywords = "Dryland rivers, Finite volume method, Sediment transport, Sediment transport model",
author = "Ryan Hummel and Guohong Duan and Shiyan Zhang",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00663.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "987--998",
journal = "Journal of the American Water Resources Association",
issn = "1093-474X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Unsteady and Quasi-Unsteady Flow Models in Simulating Sediment Transport in an Ephemeral Arizona Stream

AU - Hummel, Ryan

AU - Duan, Guohong

AU - Zhang, Shiyan

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Hydrodynamic and sediment transport models are useful engineering tools for predicting unsteady flood flow and sediment transport. Many models such as HEC-RAS, HEC-6, and IALLUVIAL apply quasi-unsteady flow model, whereas others apply the unsteady flow model. It remains unknown if a quasi-unsteady flow model is sufficiently accurate for simulating sediment transport in rapidly varied unsteady flood events, especially in ephemeral rivers in arid and semiarid regions. This study compared the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS 4.1 model with one-dimensional (1D) Finite Volume Method (FVM) based model in simulating flood flow and sediment transport in the Pantano Wash, a dryland river in the state of Arizona. The objective is to determine which sediment transport method is appropriate in predicting bed elevation changes in an ephemeral stream, Pantano Wash, and if an unsteady model is more accurate than a quasi-unsteady flow model in predicting sediment transport. Results showed that the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS model and the 1D FVM yielded similar results of bed degradation and aggradation for this dryland stream, although the FVM model predicted better flood hydrographs. Among the seven sediment transport formulas embedded in HEC-RAS, Yang's and Engelund-Hansen's equations gave the best matches with the field measurements for this particular case study.

AB - Hydrodynamic and sediment transport models are useful engineering tools for predicting unsteady flood flow and sediment transport. Many models such as HEC-RAS, HEC-6, and IALLUVIAL apply quasi-unsteady flow model, whereas others apply the unsteady flow model. It remains unknown if a quasi-unsteady flow model is sufficiently accurate for simulating sediment transport in rapidly varied unsteady flood events, especially in ephemeral rivers in arid and semiarid regions. This study compared the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS 4.1 model with one-dimensional (1D) Finite Volume Method (FVM) based model in simulating flood flow and sediment transport in the Pantano Wash, a dryland river in the state of Arizona. The objective is to determine which sediment transport method is appropriate in predicting bed elevation changes in an ephemeral stream, Pantano Wash, and if an unsteady model is more accurate than a quasi-unsteady flow model in predicting sediment transport. Results showed that the quasi-unsteady HEC-RAS model and the 1D FVM yielded similar results of bed degradation and aggradation for this dryland stream, although the FVM model predicted better flood hydrographs. Among the seven sediment transport formulas embedded in HEC-RAS, Yang's and Engelund-Hansen's equations gave the best matches with the field measurements for this particular case study.

KW - Dryland rivers

KW - Finite volume method

KW - Sediment transport

KW - Sediment transport model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867103046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867103046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00663.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00663.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867103046

VL - 48

SP - 987

EP - 998

JO - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JF - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

SN - 1093-474X

IS - 5

ER -