Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema

Sheila H. Ridner, L. D. Montgomery, Joseph Hepworth, B. R. Stewart, J. M. Armer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lymphedema is a problem for breast cancer survivors. The proliferation of limb measurement techniques makes it difficult to know how best to measure an at-risk limb. Using a sample of healthy volunteers and individuals with lymphedema, this study: 1) examined the relationship between more commonly used circumferential limb measurement methods and newer measurement methods of infrared laser perometry and bioelectrical impedance; 2) compared self-reported arm symptoms in healthy volunteers and breast cancer survivors with known lymphedema; and 3) explored the relationships among self-reported arm symptoms and circumferential tape measurement, infrared laser (perometry), and single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. Lymphedema index ratios were calculated to allow comparison among measurement methods. Measurement methods correlated strongly with each other. Fourteen symptoms were reported by one or more participants in the lymphedema group while participants in the healthy volunteer group reported only eight symptoms over the same time frames. Using p<0.001, all measurement methods correlated with self-reported arm swelling in the past year, while only circumferential and impedance measurements correlated with firmness. Future research needs to include serial arm measurements to explore arm volume variation in healthy and lymphedema volunteers and to further investigate possible lymphedema index ratios cut points as lymphedema diagnostic criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-46
Number of pages12
JournalLymphology
Volume40
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Upper Extremity
Healthy Volunteers
Arm
Electric Impedance
Extremities
Lasers
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bioelectrical impedance
  • Breast cancer lymphedema
  • Infrared scanning
  • Lymphedema measurement methods
  • Perometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema. / Ridner, Sheila H.; Montgomery, L. D.; Hepworth, Joseph; Stewart, B. R.; Armer, J. M.

In: Lymphology, Vol. 40, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 35-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ridner, Sheila H. ; Montgomery, L. D. ; Hepworth, Joseph ; Stewart, B. R. ; Armer, J. M. / Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema. In: Lymphology. 2007 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 35-46.
@article{74d09c03969440eeb0e202ae5a863626,
title = "Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema",
abstract = "Lymphedema is a problem for breast cancer survivors. The proliferation of limb measurement techniques makes it difficult to know how best to measure an at-risk limb. Using a sample of healthy volunteers and individuals with lymphedema, this study: 1) examined the relationship between more commonly used circumferential limb measurement methods and newer measurement methods of infrared laser perometry and bioelectrical impedance; 2) compared self-reported arm symptoms in healthy volunteers and breast cancer survivors with known lymphedema; and 3) explored the relationships among self-reported arm symptoms and circumferential tape measurement, infrared laser (perometry), and single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. Lymphedema index ratios were calculated to allow comparison among measurement methods. Measurement methods correlated strongly with each other. Fourteen symptoms were reported by one or more participants in the lymphedema group while participants in the healthy volunteer group reported only eight symptoms over the same time frames. Using p<0.001, all measurement methods correlated with self-reported arm swelling in the past year, while only circumferential and impedance measurements correlated with firmness. Future research needs to include serial arm measurements to explore arm volume variation in healthy and lymphedema volunteers and to further investigate possible lymphedema index ratios cut points as lymphedema diagnostic criteria.",
keywords = "Bioelectrical impedance, Breast cancer lymphedema, Infrared scanning, Lymphedema measurement methods, Perometry",
author = "Ridner, {Sheila H.} and Montgomery, {L. D.} and Joseph Hepworth and Stewart, {B. R.} and Armer, {J. M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "35--46",
journal = "Lymphology",
issn = "0024-7766",
publisher = "International Society of Lymphology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema

AU - Ridner, Sheila H.

AU - Montgomery, L. D.

AU - Hepworth, Joseph

AU - Stewart, B. R.

AU - Armer, J. M.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Lymphedema is a problem for breast cancer survivors. The proliferation of limb measurement techniques makes it difficult to know how best to measure an at-risk limb. Using a sample of healthy volunteers and individuals with lymphedema, this study: 1) examined the relationship between more commonly used circumferential limb measurement methods and newer measurement methods of infrared laser perometry and bioelectrical impedance; 2) compared self-reported arm symptoms in healthy volunteers and breast cancer survivors with known lymphedema; and 3) explored the relationships among self-reported arm symptoms and circumferential tape measurement, infrared laser (perometry), and single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. Lymphedema index ratios were calculated to allow comparison among measurement methods. Measurement methods correlated strongly with each other. Fourteen symptoms were reported by one or more participants in the lymphedema group while participants in the healthy volunteer group reported only eight symptoms over the same time frames. Using p<0.001, all measurement methods correlated with self-reported arm swelling in the past year, while only circumferential and impedance measurements correlated with firmness. Future research needs to include serial arm measurements to explore arm volume variation in healthy and lymphedema volunteers and to further investigate possible lymphedema index ratios cut points as lymphedema diagnostic criteria.

AB - Lymphedema is a problem for breast cancer survivors. The proliferation of limb measurement techniques makes it difficult to know how best to measure an at-risk limb. Using a sample of healthy volunteers and individuals with lymphedema, this study: 1) examined the relationship between more commonly used circumferential limb measurement methods and newer measurement methods of infrared laser perometry and bioelectrical impedance; 2) compared self-reported arm symptoms in healthy volunteers and breast cancer survivors with known lymphedema; and 3) explored the relationships among self-reported arm symptoms and circumferential tape measurement, infrared laser (perometry), and single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. Lymphedema index ratios were calculated to allow comparison among measurement methods. Measurement methods correlated strongly with each other. Fourteen symptoms were reported by one or more participants in the lymphedema group while participants in the healthy volunteer group reported only eight symptoms over the same time frames. Using p<0.001, all measurement methods correlated with self-reported arm swelling in the past year, while only circumferential and impedance measurements correlated with firmness. Future research needs to include serial arm measurements to explore arm volume variation in healthy and lymphedema volunteers and to further investigate possible lymphedema index ratios cut points as lymphedema diagnostic criteria.

KW - Bioelectrical impedance

KW - Breast cancer lymphedema

KW - Infrared scanning

KW - Lymphedema measurement methods

KW - Perometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247606392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247606392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17539463

AN - SCOPUS:34247606392

VL - 40

SP - 35

EP - 46

JO - Lymphology

JF - Lymphology

SN - 0024-7766

IS - 1

ER -