Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics

Maria Vinas, Carlos Dorronsoro, Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan, Clara Benedi-Garcia, Edward Anthony LaVilla, James T Schwiegerling, Susana Marcos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial-light-modulators (SLM) are increasingly used as active elements in adaptive optics (AO) systems to simulate optical corrections, in particular multifocal presbyopic corrections. In this study, we compared vision with lathe-manufactured multi-zone (2-4) multifocal, angularly and radially, segmented surfaces and through the same corrections simulated with a SLM in a custom-developed two-active-element AO visual simulator. We found that perceived visual quality measured through real manufactured surfaces and SLM-simulated phase maps corresponded highly. Optical simulations predicted differences in perceived visual quality across different designs at Far distance, but showed some discrepancies at intermediate and near.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number#281104
Pages (from-to)2055-2068
Number of pages14
JournalBiomedical Optics Express
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

light modulators
optics
adaptive optics
Light
simulators
simulation

Keywords

  • Aberrations (global)
  • Active or adaptive optics
  • Optics of physiological systems
  • Physical optics
  • Physiological optics
  • Vision, color and visual optics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Cite this

Vinas, M., Dorronsoro, C., Radhakrishnan, A., Benedi-Garcia, C., LaVilla, E. A., Schwiegerling, J. T., & Marcos, S. (2017). Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics. Biomedical Optics Express, 8(4), 2055-2068. [#281104]. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.002055

Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics. / Vinas, Maria; Dorronsoro, Carlos; Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah; Benedi-Garcia, Clara; LaVilla, Edward Anthony; Schwiegerling, James T; Marcos, Susana.

In: Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 8, No. 4, #281104, 01.04.2017, p. 2055-2068.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vinas, M, Dorronsoro, C, Radhakrishnan, A, Benedi-Garcia, C, LaVilla, EA, Schwiegerling, JT & Marcos, S 2017, 'Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics', Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 8, no. 4, #281104, pp. 2055-2068. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.002055
Vinas M, Dorronsoro C, Radhakrishnan A, Benedi-Garcia C, LaVilla EA, Schwiegerling JT et al. Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics. Biomedical Optics Express. 2017 Apr 1;8(4):2055-2068. #281104. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.002055
Vinas, Maria ; Dorronsoro, Carlos ; Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah ; Benedi-Garcia, Clara ; LaVilla, Edward Anthony ; Schwiegerling, James T ; Marcos, Susana. / Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics. In: Biomedical Optics Express. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 2055-2068.
@article{b64cf44393df46fc9e68b43d06a862ac,
title = "Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics",
abstract = "Spatial-light-modulators (SLM) are increasingly used as active elements in adaptive optics (AO) systems to simulate optical corrections, in particular multifocal presbyopic corrections. In this study, we compared vision with lathe-manufactured multi-zone (2-4) multifocal, angularly and radially, segmented surfaces and through the same corrections simulated with a SLM in a custom-developed two-active-element AO visual simulator. We found that perceived visual quality measured through real manufactured surfaces and SLM-simulated phase maps corresponded highly. Optical simulations predicted differences in perceived visual quality across different designs at Far distance, but showed some discrepancies at intermediate and near.",
keywords = "Aberrations (global), Active or adaptive optics, Optics of physiological systems, Physical optics, Physiological optics, Vision, color and visual optics",
author = "Maria Vinas and Carlos Dorronsoro and Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan and Clara Benedi-Garcia and LaVilla, {Edward Anthony} and Schwiegerling, {James T} and Susana Marcos",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1364/BOE.8.002055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "2055--2068",
journal = "Biomedical Optics Express",
issn = "2156-7085",
publisher = "The Optical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics

AU - Vinas, Maria

AU - Dorronsoro, Carlos

AU - Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah

AU - Benedi-Garcia, Clara

AU - LaVilla, Edward Anthony

AU - Schwiegerling, James T

AU - Marcos, Susana

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Spatial-light-modulators (SLM) are increasingly used as active elements in adaptive optics (AO) systems to simulate optical corrections, in particular multifocal presbyopic corrections. In this study, we compared vision with lathe-manufactured multi-zone (2-4) multifocal, angularly and radially, segmented surfaces and through the same corrections simulated with a SLM in a custom-developed two-active-element AO visual simulator. We found that perceived visual quality measured through real manufactured surfaces and SLM-simulated phase maps corresponded highly. Optical simulations predicted differences in perceived visual quality across different designs at Far distance, but showed some discrepancies at intermediate and near.

AB - Spatial-light-modulators (SLM) are increasingly used as active elements in adaptive optics (AO) systems to simulate optical corrections, in particular multifocal presbyopic corrections. In this study, we compared vision with lathe-manufactured multi-zone (2-4) multifocal, angularly and radially, segmented surfaces and through the same corrections simulated with a SLM in a custom-developed two-active-element AO visual simulator. We found that perceived visual quality measured through real manufactured surfaces and SLM-simulated phase maps corresponded highly. Optical simulations predicted differences in perceived visual quality across different designs at Far distance, but showed some discrepancies at intermediate and near.

KW - Aberrations (global)

KW - Active or adaptive optics

KW - Optics of physiological systems

KW - Physical optics

KW - Physiological optics

KW - Vision, color and visual optics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017037177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017037177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1364/BOE.8.002055

DO - 10.1364/BOE.8.002055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017037177

VL - 8

SP - 2055

EP - 2068

JO - Biomedical Optics Express

JF - Biomedical Optics Express

SN - 2156-7085

IS - 4

M1 - #281104

ER -