Abstract
This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference |
| State | Published - 2010 |
| Event | 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference - Orlando, FL, United States Duration: Apr 12 2010 → Apr 15 2010 |
Other
| Other | 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| City | Orlando, FL |
| Period | 4/12/10 → 4/15/10 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Mechanics of Materials
- Building and Construction
- Architecture
Cite this
Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. / Agwai, A.; Guven, I.; Madenci, Erdogan.
Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010. 2010-2539.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation
AU - Agwai, A.
AU - Guven, I.
AU - Madenci, Erdogan
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.
AB - This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855627595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855627595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84855627595
SN - 9781600867422
BT - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
ER -