Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation

A. Agwai, I. Guven, Erdogan Madenci

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCollection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
StatePublished - 2010
Event51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Apr 12 2010Apr 15 2010

Other

Other51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period4/12/104/15/10

Fingerprint

Crack initiation
Crack propagation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture

Cite this

Agwai, A., Guven, I., & Madenci, E. (2010). Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference [2010-2539]

Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. / Agwai, A.; Guven, I.; Madenci, Erdogan.

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010. 2010-2539.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Agwai, A, Guven, I & Madenci, E 2010, Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. in Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference., 2010-2539, 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, United States, 4/12/10.
Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E. Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010. 2010-2539
Agwai, A. ; Guven, I. ; Madenci, Erdogan. / Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010.
@inproceedings{fafa6bcb0c2a49279194b27ddc673a73,
title = "Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation",
abstract = "This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.",
author = "A. Agwai and I. Guven and Erdogan Madenci",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781600867422",
booktitle = "Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation

AU - Agwai, A.

AU - Guven, I.

AU - Madenci, Erdogan

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

AB - This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855627595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855627595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84855627595

SN - 9781600867422

BT - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

ER -