Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation

A. Agwai; I. Guven; E. Madenci

Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation

A. Agwai, I. Guven, E. Madenci

Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
State	Published - Dec 16 2010
Event	51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference - Orlando, FL, United States Duration: Apr 12 2010 → Apr 15 2010

Publication series

Name	Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
ISSN (Print)	0273-4508

Other

Other	51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
Country/Territory	United States
City	Orlando, FL
Period	4/12/10 → 4/15/10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Architecture
Materials Science(all)
Aerospace Engineering
Mechanics of Materials
Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. / Agwai, A.; Guven, I.; Madenci, E.

51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010. 2010-2539 (Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Agwai, A, Guven, I & Madenci, E 2010, Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation. in 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference., 2010-2539, Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, United States, 4/12/10.

@inproceedings{fafa6bcb0c2a49279194b27ddc673a73,

title = "Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation",

abstract = "This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.",

author = "A. Agwai and I. Guven and E. Madenci",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

day = "16",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781600867422",

series = "Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference",

booktitle = "51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference",

note = "51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference ; Conference date: 12-04-2010 Through 15-04-2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation

AU - Agwai, A.

AU - Guven, I.

AU - Madenci, E.

PY - 2010/12/16

Y1 - 2010/12/16

N2 - This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

AB - This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855627595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855627595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84855627595

SN - 9781600867422

T3 - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

BT - 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

T2 - 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

Y2 - 12 April 2010 through 15 April 2010

ER -

Comparison of XFEM, CZM and PD for predicting crack initiation and propagation

Abstract

Publication series

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this