Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: Clinical article

Tien V. Le, Donald A. Smith, Mark S. Greenberg, Elias Dakwar, Mhd-Ali - Baaj, Juan S. Uribe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with 101 cases over the past 3 years with minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion using a lateral plate. Their main goal was to specifically look for hardware- associated complications. Three cases of hardware failure and 3 cases of vertebral body (VB) fractures associated with lateral plate placement are reported. The authors also review the literature pertaining to lateral plates and related complications. Methods. This study is a retrospective review of a database of patients who underwent minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion in the thoracolumbar spine during a 3-year period. Results. Six complications were identified, resulting in an incidence of 5.9%. Three hardware failures, 2 coronal plane VB fractures, and 1 lateral VB fracture were identified. All complications occurred in multilevel cases. All cases presented with recurrent back pain except one, which was identified incidentally. Conclusions. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion is a safe and direct technique that is practical, especially when trying to avoid other approaches for hardware insertion, and it also avoids the complications associated with other types of instrumentation such as pedicle screws. Careful consideration during patient selection and during the operation will aid in the avoidance of complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-307
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Patient Selection
Spine
Databases
Incidence
Pedicle Screws

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Extreme lateral interbody fusion
  • Fracture
  • Lateral plate
  • Minimally invasive lateral approach
  • Technique
  • Transpsoas approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach : Clinical article. / Le, Tien V.; Smith, Donald A.; Greenberg, Mark S.; Dakwar, Elias; Baaj, Mhd-Ali -; Uribe, Juan S.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 16, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 302-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Le, Tien V. ; Smith, Donald A. ; Greenberg, Mark S. ; Dakwar, Elias ; Baaj, Mhd-Ali - ; Uribe, Juan S. / Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach : Clinical article. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 302-307.
@article{eaccec1b651e4a8185252d41bafcc6d2,
title = "Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: Clinical article",
abstract = "Object. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with 101 cases over the past 3 years with minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion using a lateral plate. Their main goal was to specifically look for hardware- associated complications. Three cases of hardware failure and 3 cases of vertebral body (VB) fractures associated with lateral plate placement are reported. The authors also review the literature pertaining to lateral plates and related complications. Methods. This study is a retrospective review of a database of patients who underwent minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion in the thoracolumbar spine during a 3-year period. Results. Six complications were identified, resulting in an incidence of 5.9{\%}. Three hardware failures, 2 coronal plane VB fractures, and 1 lateral VB fracture were identified. All complications occurred in multilevel cases. All cases presented with recurrent back pain except one, which was identified incidentally. Conclusions. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion is a safe and direct technique that is practical, especially when trying to avoid other approaches for hardware insertion, and it also avoids the complications associated with other types of instrumentation such as pedicle screws. Careful consideration during patient selection and during the operation will aid in the avoidance of complications.",
keywords = "Complications, Extreme lateral interbody fusion, Fracture, Lateral plate, Minimally invasive lateral approach, Technique, Transpsoas approach",
author = "Le, {Tien V.} and Smith, {Donald A.} and Greenberg, {Mark S.} and Elias Dakwar and Baaj, {Mhd-Ali -} and Uribe, {Juan S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11653",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "302--307",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach

T2 - Clinical article

AU - Le, Tien V.

AU - Smith, Donald A.

AU - Greenberg, Mark S.

AU - Dakwar, Elias

AU - Baaj, Mhd-Ali -

AU - Uribe, Juan S.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Object. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with 101 cases over the past 3 years with minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion using a lateral plate. Their main goal was to specifically look for hardware- associated complications. Three cases of hardware failure and 3 cases of vertebral body (VB) fractures associated with lateral plate placement are reported. The authors also review the literature pertaining to lateral plates and related complications. Methods. This study is a retrospective review of a database of patients who underwent minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion in the thoracolumbar spine during a 3-year period. Results. Six complications were identified, resulting in an incidence of 5.9%. Three hardware failures, 2 coronal plane VB fractures, and 1 lateral VB fracture were identified. All complications occurred in multilevel cases. All cases presented with recurrent back pain except one, which was identified incidentally. Conclusions. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion is a safe and direct technique that is practical, especially when trying to avoid other approaches for hardware insertion, and it also avoids the complications associated with other types of instrumentation such as pedicle screws. Careful consideration during patient selection and during the operation will aid in the avoidance of complications.

AB - Object. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with 101 cases over the past 3 years with minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion using a lateral plate. Their main goal was to specifically look for hardware- associated complications. Three cases of hardware failure and 3 cases of vertebral body (VB) fractures associated with lateral plate placement are reported. The authors also review the literature pertaining to lateral plates and related complications. Methods. This study is a retrospective review of a database of patients who underwent minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion in the thoracolumbar spine during a 3-year period. Results. Six complications were identified, resulting in an incidence of 5.9%. Three hardware failures, 2 coronal plane VB fractures, and 1 lateral VB fracture were identified. All complications occurred in multilevel cases. All cases presented with recurrent back pain except one, which was identified incidentally. Conclusions. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion is a safe and direct technique that is practical, especially when trying to avoid other approaches for hardware insertion, and it also avoids the complications associated with other types of instrumentation such as pedicle screws. Careful consideration during patient selection and during the operation will aid in the avoidance of complications.

KW - Complications

KW - Extreme lateral interbody fusion

KW - Fracture

KW - Lateral plate

KW - Minimally invasive lateral approach

KW - Technique

KW - Transpsoas approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863275733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863275733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11653

DO - 10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11653

M3 - Article

C2 - 22176426

AN - SCOPUS:84863275733

VL - 16

SP - 302

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 3

ER -