Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One

Alan R. Dennis, Joseph S Valacich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

331 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brainstorming in which group members interact verbally. This article presents the results of an experiment that found the reverse to be true for computer-mediated electronic brainstorming. In this experiment, 12-member electronically interacting groups generated more ideas than did 12-member nominal groups, and there were no differences between 6-member electronic and 6-member nominal groups. The authors attribute these results to the ability of electronic brainstorming to introduce few process losses (production blocking, evaluation apprehension, and free riding) while enabling process gains (synergy and the avoidance of redundant ideas).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-537
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume78
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Computer Brainstorms : More Heads Are Better Than One. / Dennis, Alan R.; Valacich, Joseph S.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 4, 08.1993, p. 531-537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96ba1a5c18654b2583abf75f46512cfe,
title = "Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One",
abstract = "Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brainstorming in which group members interact verbally. This article presents the results of an experiment that found the reverse to be true for computer-mediated electronic brainstorming. In this experiment, 12-member electronically interacting groups generated more ideas than did 12-member nominal groups, and there were no differences between 6-member electronic and 6-member nominal groups. The authors attribute these results to the ability of electronic brainstorming to introduce few process losses (production blocking, evaluation apprehension, and free riding) while enabling process gains (synergy and the avoidance of redundant ideas).",
author = "Dennis, {Alan R.} and Valacich, {Joseph S}",
year = "1993",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "531--537",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer Brainstorms

T2 - More Heads Are Better Than One

AU - Dennis, Alan R.

AU - Valacich, Joseph S

PY - 1993/8

Y1 - 1993/8

N2 - Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brainstorming in which group members interact verbally. This article presents the results of an experiment that found the reverse to be true for computer-mediated electronic brainstorming. In this experiment, 12-member electronically interacting groups generated more ideas than did 12-member nominal groups, and there were no differences between 6-member electronic and 6-member nominal groups. The authors attribute these results to the ability of electronic brainstorming to introduce few process losses (production blocking, evaluation apprehension, and free riding) while enabling process gains (synergy and the avoidance of redundant ideas).

AB - Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brainstorming in which group members interact verbally. This article presents the results of an experiment that found the reverse to be true for computer-mediated electronic brainstorming. In this experiment, 12-member electronically interacting groups generated more ideas than did 12-member nominal groups, and there were no differences between 6-member electronic and 6-member nominal groups. The authors attribute these results to the ability of electronic brainstorming to introduce few process losses (production blocking, evaluation apprehension, and free riding) while enabling process gains (synergy and the avoidance of redundant ideas).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144482350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21144482350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21144482350

VL - 78

SP - 531

EP - 537

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 4

ER -