Computer scoring of the levels of emotional awareness scale

Kimberly A. Barchard, Jane Bajgar, Duncan Ermini Leaf, Richard D Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS; Lane, Quinlan, Schwartz, Walker, & Zeitlan, 1990) is the most commonly used measure of differentiation and complexity in the use of emotion words and is associated with important clinical outcomes. Hand scoring the LEAS is time consuming. Existing programs for scoring open-ended responses cannot mimic LEAS hand scoring. Therefore, Leaf and Barchard (2006) developed the Program for Open-Ended Scoring (POES) to score the LEAS. In this article, we report a study in which the reliability and validity of POES scoring were examined. In the study, we used three participant types (adult community members, university students, children), three LEAS versions (paper based, computer based, and the LEAS for children), and a diverse set of criterion variables. Across this variety of conditions, the four POES scoring methods had internal consistencies and validities that were comparable to hand scoring, indicating that POES scoring can be used in clinical practice and other applied settings in which hand scoring is impractical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)586-595
Number of pages10
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Hand
Reproducibility of Results
Emotions
Research Design
Students
Emotion
Scoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Computer scoring of the levels of emotional awareness scale. / Barchard, Kimberly A.; Bajgar, Jane; Leaf, Duncan Ermini; Lane, Richard D.

In: Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 42, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 586-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barchard, Kimberly A. ; Bajgar, Jane ; Leaf, Duncan Ermini ; Lane, Richard D. / Computer scoring of the levels of emotional awareness scale. In: Behavior Research Methods. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 586-595.
@article{826c9d58fb7a4fab8d75802064ce0148,
title = "Computer scoring of the levels of emotional awareness scale",
abstract = "The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS; Lane, Quinlan, Schwartz, Walker, & Zeitlan, 1990) is the most commonly used measure of differentiation and complexity in the use of emotion words and is associated with important clinical outcomes. Hand scoring the LEAS is time consuming. Existing programs for scoring open-ended responses cannot mimic LEAS hand scoring. Therefore, Leaf and Barchard (2006) developed the Program for Open-Ended Scoring (POES) to score the LEAS. In this article, we report a study in which the reliability and validity of POES scoring were examined. In the study, we used three participant types (adult community members, university students, children), three LEAS versions (paper based, computer based, and the LEAS for children), and a diverse set of criterion variables. Across this variety of conditions, the four POES scoring methods had internal consistencies and validities that were comparable to hand scoring, indicating that POES scoring can be used in clinical practice and other applied settings in which hand scoring is impractical.",
author = "Barchard, {Kimberly A.} and Jane Bajgar and Leaf, {Duncan Ermini} and Lane, {Richard D}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3758/BRM.42.2.586",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "586--595",
journal = "Behavior Research Methods",
issn = "1554-351X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer scoring of the levels of emotional awareness scale

AU - Barchard, Kimberly A.

AU - Bajgar, Jane

AU - Leaf, Duncan Ermini

AU - Lane, Richard D

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS; Lane, Quinlan, Schwartz, Walker, & Zeitlan, 1990) is the most commonly used measure of differentiation and complexity in the use of emotion words and is associated with important clinical outcomes. Hand scoring the LEAS is time consuming. Existing programs for scoring open-ended responses cannot mimic LEAS hand scoring. Therefore, Leaf and Barchard (2006) developed the Program for Open-Ended Scoring (POES) to score the LEAS. In this article, we report a study in which the reliability and validity of POES scoring were examined. In the study, we used three participant types (adult community members, university students, children), three LEAS versions (paper based, computer based, and the LEAS for children), and a diverse set of criterion variables. Across this variety of conditions, the four POES scoring methods had internal consistencies and validities that were comparable to hand scoring, indicating that POES scoring can be used in clinical practice and other applied settings in which hand scoring is impractical.

AB - The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS; Lane, Quinlan, Schwartz, Walker, & Zeitlan, 1990) is the most commonly used measure of differentiation and complexity in the use of emotion words and is associated with important clinical outcomes. Hand scoring the LEAS is time consuming. Existing programs for scoring open-ended responses cannot mimic LEAS hand scoring. Therefore, Leaf and Barchard (2006) developed the Program for Open-Ended Scoring (POES) to score the LEAS. In this article, we report a study in which the reliability and validity of POES scoring were examined. In the study, we used three participant types (adult community members, university students, children), three LEAS versions (paper based, computer based, and the LEAS for children), and a diverse set of criterion variables. Across this variety of conditions, the four POES scoring methods had internal consistencies and validities that were comparable to hand scoring, indicating that POES scoring can be used in clinical practice and other applied settings in which hand scoring is impractical.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955915908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955915908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BRM.42.2.586

DO - 10.3758/BRM.42.2.586

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 586

EP - 595

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

SN - 1554-351X

IS - 2

ER -