Concept Inventories: Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several concept inventories have been developed to elicit students' alternative conceptions in chemistry. It is suggested that heuristic reasoning may bias students' answers in these types of assessments toward intuitively appealing choices. If this is the case, one could expect students to improve their performance by engaging in more analytical reasoning. Research has shown that analytical reasoning is activated when people experience metacognitive difficulty or conflict. This study presents the results of an intervention designed to trigger one of such experiences by asking students to make predictions about the wrong answers most commonly selected by unreflective students. Major findings show that this simple prompt has a significant positive impact on students' answers, regardless of their academic performance in the course. The effects, however, are not uniform across different topics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1805-1810
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Chemical Education
Volume94
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2017

Fingerprint

Students
performance
student
heuristics
experience
chemistry
trend

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Chemical Education Research
  • First-Year Undergraduate/General
  • High School/Introductory Chemistry
  • Metacognition
  • Misconceptions/Discrepant Events

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Concept Inventories : Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance. / Talanquer, Vicente A.

In: Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 94, No. 12, 12.12.2017, p. 1805-1810.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3473a89f398549259194cf2f2f493bcd,
title = "Concept Inventories: Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance",
abstract = "Several concept inventories have been developed to elicit students' alternative conceptions in chemistry. It is suggested that heuristic reasoning may bias students' answers in these types of assessments toward intuitively appealing choices. If this is the case, one could expect students to improve their performance by engaging in more analytical reasoning. Research has shown that analytical reasoning is activated when people experience metacognitive difficulty or conflict. This study presents the results of an intervention designed to trigger one of such experiences by asking students to make predictions about the wrong answers most commonly selected by unreflective students. Major findings show that this simple prompt has a significant positive impact on students' answers, regardless of their academic performance in the course. The effects, however, are not uniform across different topics.",
keywords = "Assessment, Chemical Education Research, First-Year Undergraduate/General, High School/Introductory Chemistry, Metacognition, Misconceptions/Discrepant Events",
author = "Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "1805--1810",
journal = "Journal of Chemical Education",
issn = "0021-9584",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concept Inventories

T2 - Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2017/12/12

Y1 - 2017/12/12

N2 - Several concept inventories have been developed to elicit students' alternative conceptions in chemistry. It is suggested that heuristic reasoning may bias students' answers in these types of assessments toward intuitively appealing choices. If this is the case, one could expect students to improve their performance by engaging in more analytical reasoning. Research has shown that analytical reasoning is activated when people experience metacognitive difficulty or conflict. This study presents the results of an intervention designed to trigger one of such experiences by asking students to make predictions about the wrong answers most commonly selected by unreflective students. Major findings show that this simple prompt has a significant positive impact on students' answers, regardless of their academic performance in the course. The effects, however, are not uniform across different topics.

AB - Several concept inventories have been developed to elicit students' alternative conceptions in chemistry. It is suggested that heuristic reasoning may bias students' answers in these types of assessments toward intuitively appealing choices. If this is the case, one could expect students to improve their performance by engaging in more analytical reasoning. Research has shown that analytical reasoning is activated when people experience metacognitive difficulty or conflict. This study presents the results of an intervention designed to trigger one of such experiences by asking students to make predictions about the wrong answers most commonly selected by unreflective students. Major findings show that this simple prompt has a significant positive impact on students' answers, regardless of their academic performance in the course. The effects, however, are not uniform across different topics.

KW - Assessment

KW - Chemical Education Research

KW - First-Year Undergraduate/General

KW - High School/Introductory Chemistry

KW - Metacognition

KW - Misconceptions/Discrepant Events

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038243880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038243880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00427

DO - 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00427

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038243880

VL - 94

SP - 1805

EP - 1810

JO - Journal of Chemical Education

JF - Journal of Chemical Education

SN - 0021-9584

IS - 12

ER -