Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation

Richard J. Davidson, Alfred W Kaszniak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both basic science and clinical research on mindfulness, meditation, and related constructs have dramatically increased in recent years. However, interpretation of these research results has been challenging. The present article addresses unique conceptual and methodological problems posed by research in this area. Included among the key topics is the role of first-person experience and how it can be best studied, the challenges posed by intervention research designs in which true double-blinding is not possible, the nature of control and comparison conditions for research that includes mindfulness or other meditationbased interventions, issues in the adequate description of mindfulness and related trainings and interventions, the question of how mindfulness can be measured, questions regarding what can and cannot be inferred from self-report measures, and considerations regarding the structure of study design and data analyses. Most of these topics are germane to both basic and clinical research studies and have important bearing on the future scientific understanding of mindfulness and meditation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-592
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume70
Issue number7
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Mindfulness
Meditation
Research
Self Report
Research Design
Clinical Research

Keywords

  • Meditation
  • Mindfulness
  • Research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. / Davidson, Richard J.; Kaszniak, Alfred W.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 70, No. 7, 01.10.2015, p. 581-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d6a199ee3ca484f875070dba6b06485,
title = "Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation",
abstract = "Both basic science and clinical research on mindfulness, meditation, and related constructs have dramatically increased in recent years. However, interpretation of these research results has been challenging. The present article addresses unique conceptual and methodological problems posed by research in this area. Included among the key topics is the role of first-person experience and how it can be best studied, the challenges posed by intervention research designs in which true double-blinding is not possible, the nature of control and comparison conditions for research that includes mindfulness or other meditationbased interventions, issues in the adequate description of mindfulness and related trainings and interventions, the question of how mindfulness can be measured, questions regarding what can and cannot be inferred from self-report measures, and considerations regarding the structure of study design and data analyses. Most of these topics are germane to both basic and clinical research studies and have important bearing on the future scientific understanding of mindfulness and meditation.",
keywords = "Meditation, Mindfulness, Research methods",
author = "Davidson, {Richard J.} and Kaszniak, {Alfred W}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "581--592",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation

AU - Davidson, Richard J.

AU - Kaszniak, Alfred W

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Both basic science and clinical research on mindfulness, meditation, and related constructs have dramatically increased in recent years. However, interpretation of these research results has been challenging. The present article addresses unique conceptual and methodological problems posed by research in this area. Included among the key topics is the role of first-person experience and how it can be best studied, the challenges posed by intervention research designs in which true double-blinding is not possible, the nature of control and comparison conditions for research that includes mindfulness or other meditationbased interventions, issues in the adequate description of mindfulness and related trainings and interventions, the question of how mindfulness can be measured, questions regarding what can and cannot be inferred from self-report measures, and considerations regarding the structure of study design and data analyses. Most of these topics are germane to both basic and clinical research studies and have important bearing on the future scientific understanding of mindfulness and meditation.

AB - Both basic science and clinical research on mindfulness, meditation, and related constructs have dramatically increased in recent years. However, interpretation of these research results has been challenging. The present article addresses unique conceptual and methodological problems posed by research in this area. Included among the key topics is the role of first-person experience and how it can be best studied, the challenges posed by intervention research designs in which true double-blinding is not possible, the nature of control and comparison conditions for research that includes mindfulness or other meditationbased interventions, issues in the adequate description of mindfulness and related trainings and interventions, the question of how mindfulness can be measured, questions regarding what can and cannot be inferred from self-report measures, and considerations regarding the structure of study design and data analyses. Most of these topics are germane to both basic and clinical research studies and have important bearing on the future scientific understanding of mindfulness and meditation.

KW - Meditation

KW - Mindfulness

KW - Research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943554074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943554074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26436310

AN - SCOPUS:84943554074

VL - 70

SP - 581

EP - 592

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 7

ER -