Confabulation, confidence, and introspection

Brian Fiala, Shaun B Nichols

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carruthers' arguments depend on a tenuous interpretation of cases from the confabulation literature. Specifically, Carruthers maintains that cases of confabulation are "subjectively indistinguishable" from cases of alleged introspection. However, in typical cases of confabulation, the self-attributions are characterized by low confidence, in contrast to cases of alleged introspection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-145
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology

Cite this

Confabulation, confidence, and introspection. / Fiala, Brian; Nichols, Shaun B.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2009, p. 144-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44a00a6f8711485f8aa6e2ec38aca56e,
title = "Confabulation, confidence, and introspection",
abstract = "Carruthers' arguments depend on a tenuous interpretation of cases from the confabulation literature. Specifically, Carruthers maintains that cases of confabulation are {"}subjectively indistinguishable{"} from cases of alleged introspection. However, in typical cases of confabulation, the self-attributions are characterized by low confidence, in contrast to cases of alleged introspection.",
author = "Brian Fiala and Nichols, {Shaun B}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X09000624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "144--145",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confabulation, confidence, and introspection

AU - Fiala, Brian

AU - Nichols, Shaun B

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Carruthers' arguments depend on a tenuous interpretation of cases from the confabulation literature. Specifically, Carruthers maintains that cases of confabulation are "subjectively indistinguishable" from cases of alleged introspection. However, in typical cases of confabulation, the self-attributions are characterized by low confidence, in contrast to cases of alleged introspection.

AB - Carruthers' arguments depend on a tenuous interpretation of cases from the confabulation literature. Specifically, Carruthers maintains that cases of confabulation are "subjectively indistinguishable" from cases of alleged introspection. However, in typical cases of confabulation, the self-attributions are characterized by low confidence, in contrast to cases of alleged introspection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349168744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349168744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X09000624

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X09000624

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349168744

VL - 32

SP - 144

EP - 145

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2

ER -