Conflict inside and outside

Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms

Songcui - Hu, Zi Lin He, Daniela P. Blettner, Richard A. Bettis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research summary: Behavioral Theory highlights the crucial role of social comparisons in attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. Yet, both the specification of social reference points and the dynamics of attention allocation have received little scholarly examination. We address performance feedback from two social reference points relative to divisions in multidivisional firms: economic reference point and political reference point. Comparing divisional performance with the two reference points can give consistent or inconsistent feedback, which has important consequences for the dynamics of attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. We find consistent feedback leads to more attention to own experience, while inconsistent feedback results in more attention to the social reference point the focal division underperforms. Results reveal that political reference point plays an important role in determining managerial attention allocation. Managerial summary: This article is based on how goal-based performance of divisions relative to both their relevant external market rivals and sister divisions in multidivisional firms influences corporate resource allocation. As a result, various combinations of performance against the two groups of peers drive the reallocation of divisional management attention. We show that specific attention shifts occur on average as a function of the focal division's performance relative to the marketplace performance and that of sister divisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1435-1454
Number of pages20
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Reference point
Social comparison
Aspiration
Performance feedback
Peers
Economics
Behavioral theory
Reallocation
Relative performance
Resource allocation

Keywords

  • adaptive aspirations
  • attention allocation
  • multidivisional firms
  • political coalition
  • social comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Conflict inside and outside : Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms. / Hu, Songcui -; He, Zi Lin; Blettner, Daniela P.; Bettis, Richard A.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 1435-1454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hu, Songcui - ; He, Zi Lin ; Blettner, Daniela P. ; Bettis, Richard A. / Conflict inside and outside : Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 7. pp. 1435-1454.
@article{e1f439f364834e1db3d220869c1f41fa,
title = "Conflict inside and outside: Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms",
abstract = "Research summary: Behavioral Theory highlights the crucial role of social comparisons in attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. Yet, both the specification of social reference points and the dynamics of attention allocation have received little scholarly examination. We address performance feedback from two social reference points relative to divisions in multidivisional firms: economic reference point and political reference point. Comparing divisional performance with the two reference points can give consistent or inconsistent feedback, which has important consequences for the dynamics of attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. We find consistent feedback leads to more attention to own experience, while inconsistent feedback results in more attention to the social reference point the focal division underperforms. Results reveal that political reference point plays an important role in determining managerial attention allocation. Managerial summary: This article is based on how goal-based performance of divisions relative to both their relevant external market rivals and sister divisions in multidivisional firms influences corporate resource allocation. As a result, various combinations of performance against the two groups of peers drive the reallocation of divisional management attention. We show that specific attention shifts occur on average as a function of the focal division's performance relative to the marketplace performance and that of sister divisions.",
keywords = "adaptive aspirations, attention allocation, multidivisional firms, political coalition, social comparison",
author = "Hu, {Songcui -} and He, {Zi Lin} and Blettner, {Daniela P.} and Bettis, {Richard A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2556",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1435--1454",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict inside and outside

T2 - Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms

AU - Hu, Songcui -

AU - He, Zi Lin

AU - Blettner, Daniela P.

AU - Bettis, Richard A.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Research summary: Behavioral Theory highlights the crucial role of social comparisons in attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. Yet, both the specification of social reference points and the dynamics of attention allocation have received little scholarly examination. We address performance feedback from two social reference points relative to divisions in multidivisional firms: economic reference point and political reference point. Comparing divisional performance with the two reference points can give consistent or inconsistent feedback, which has important consequences for the dynamics of attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. We find consistent feedback leads to more attention to own experience, while inconsistent feedback results in more attention to the social reference point the focal division underperforms. Results reveal that political reference point plays an important role in determining managerial attention allocation. Managerial summary: This article is based on how goal-based performance of divisions relative to both their relevant external market rivals and sister divisions in multidivisional firms influences corporate resource allocation. As a result, various combinations of performance against the two groups of peers drive the reallocation of divisional management attention. We show that specific attention shifts occur on average as a function of the focal division's performance relative to the marketplace performance and that of sister divisions.

AB - Research summary: Behavioral Theory highlights the crucial role of social comparisons in attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. Yet, both the specification of social reference points and the dynamics of attention allocation have received little scholarly examination. We address performance feedback from two social reference points relative to divisions in multidivisional firms: economic reference point and political reference point. Comparing divisional performance with the two reference points can give consistent or inconsistent feedback, which has important consequences for the dynamics of attention allocation in adaptive aspirations. We find consistent feedback leads to more attention to own experience, while inconsistent feedback results in more attention to the social reference point the focal division underperforms. Results reveal that political reference point plays an important role in determining managerial attention allocation. Managerial summary: This article is based on how goal-based performance of divisions relative to both their relevant external market rivals and sister divisions in multidivisional firms influences corporate resource allocation. As a result, various combinations of performance against the two groups of peers drive the reallocation of divisional management attention. We show that specific attention shifts occur on average as a function of the focal division's performance relative to the marketplace performance and that of sister divisions.

KW - adaptive aspirations

KW - attention allocation

KW - multidivisional firms

KW - political coalition

KW - social comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019726821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019726821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2556

DO - 10.1002/smj.2556

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1435

EP - 1454

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 7

ER -