Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought

Thomas L. Powell, David R. Galbraith, Bradley O. Christoffersen, Anna Harper, Hewlley M A Imbuzeiro, Lucy Rowland, Samuel Almeida, Paulo M. Brando, Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa, Marcos Heil Costa, Naomi M. Levine, Yadvinder Malhi, Scott Saleska, Eleneide Sotta, Mathew Williams, Patrick Meir, Paul R. Moorcroft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)350-365
Number of pages16
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume200
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Carbon Cycle
Droughts
drought
prediction
carbon
Biomass
Ecosystem
Respiration
Soil
Climate Change
aboveground biomass
Hydrodynamics
Forests
Atmosphere
Dehydration
Uncertainty
Joints
Demography
Amazonia
demography

Keywords

  • Amazon
  • Carbon cycle
  • Drought
  • Terrestrial biosphere model
  • Throughfall exclusion
  • Tropical rainforest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science
  • Physiology

Cite this

Powell, T. L., Galbraith, D. R., Christoffersen, B. O., Harper, A., Imbuzeiro, H. M. A., Rowland, L., ... Moorcroft, P. R. (2013). Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. New Phytologist, 200(2), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12390

Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. / Powell, Thomas L.; Galbraith, David R.; Christoffersen, Bradley O.; Harper, Anna; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley M A; Rowland, Lucy; Almeida, Samuel; Brando, Paulo M.; da Costa, Antonio Carlos Lola; Costa, Marcos Heil; Levine, Naomi M.; Malhi, Yadvinder; Saleska, Scott; Sotta, Eleneide; Williams, Mathew; Meir, Patrick; Moorcroft, Paul R.

In: New Phytologist, Vol. 200, No. 2, 10.2013, p. 350-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Powell, TL, Galbraith, DR, Christoffersen, BO, Harper, A, Imbuzeiro, HMA, Rowland, L, Almeida, S, Brando, PM, da Costa, ACL, Costa, MH, Levine, NM, Malhi, Y, Saleska, S, Sotta, E, Williams, M, Meir, P & Moorcroft, PR 2013, 'Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought', New Phytologist, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12390
Powell TL, Galbraith DR, Christoffersen BO, Harper A, Imbuzeiro HMA, Rowland L et al. Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. New Phytologist. 2013 Oct;200(2):350-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12390
Powell, Thomas L. ; Galbraith, David R. ; Christoffersen, Bradley O. ; Harper, Anna ; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley M A ; Rowland, Lucy ; Almeida, Samuel ; Brando, Paulo M. ; da Costa, Antonio Carlos Lola ; Costa, Marcos Heil ; Levine, Naomi M. ; Malhi, Yadvinder ; Saleska, Scott ; Sotta, Eleneide ; Williams, Mathew ; Meir, Patrick ; Moorcroft, Paul R. / Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. In: New Phytologist. 2013 ; Vol. 200, No. 2. pp. 350-365.
@article{30280f87600d42dab02de16256856b38,
title = "Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought",
abstract = "Summary: Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20{\%} reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought.",
keywords = "Amazon, Carbon cycle, Drought, Terrestrial biosphere model, Throughfall exclusion, Tropical rainforest",
author = "Powell, {Thomas L.} and Galbraith, {David R.} and Christoffersen, {Bradley O.} and Anna Harper and Imbuzeiro, {Hewlley M A} and Lucy Rowland and Samuel Almeida and Brando, {Paulo M.} and {da Costa}, {Antonio Carlos Lola} and Costa, {Marcos Heil} and Levine, {Naomi M.} and Yadvinder Malhi and Scott Saleska and Eleneide Sotta and Mathew Williams and Patrick Meir and Moorcroft, {Paul R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/nph.12390",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "200",
pages = "350--365",
journal = "New Phytologist",
issn = "0028-646X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought

AU - Powell, Thomas L.

AU - Galbraith, David R.

AU - Christoffersen, Bradley O.

AU - Harper, Anna

AU - Imbuzeiro, Hewlley M A

AU - Rowland, Lucy

AU - Almeida, Samuel

AU - Brando, Paulo M.

AU - da Costa, Antonio Carlos Lola

AU - Costa, Marcos Heil

AU - Levine, Naomi M.

AU - Malhi, Yadvinder

AU - Saleska, Scott

AU - Sotta, Eleneide

AU - Williams, Mathew

AU - Meir, Patrick

AU - Moorcroft, Paul R.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Summary: Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought.

AB - Summary: Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought.

KW - Amazon

KW - Carbon cycle

KW - Drought

KW - Terrestrial biosphere model

KW - Throughfall exclusion

KW - Tropical rainforest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884418196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884418196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/nph.12390

DO - 10.1111/nph.12390

M3 - Article

C2 - 23844931

AN - SCOPUS:84884418196

VL - 200

SP - 350

EP - 365

JO - New Phytologist

JF - New Phytologist

SN - 0028-646X

IS - 2

ER -