Considerations for achieving cross-platform point cloud data fusion across different dryland ecosystem structural states

Tyson L. Swetnam, Jeffrey K. Gillan, Temuulen T. Sankey, Mitchel McClaran, Mary H. Nichols, Philip Heilman, Jason McVay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Remotely sensing recent growth, herbivory, or disturbance of herbaceous and woody vegetation in dryland ecosystems requires high spatial resolution and multi-temporal depth. Three dimensional (3D) remote sensing technologies like lidar, and techniques like structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry, each have strengths and weaknesses at detecting vegetation volume and extent, given the instrument’s ground sample distance and ease of acquisition. Yet, a combination of platforms and techniques might provide solutions that overcome the weakness of a single platform. To explore the potential for combining platforms, we compared detection bias amongst two 3D remote sensing techniques (lidar and SfM) using three different platforms [ground-based, small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS), and manned aircraft]. We found aerial lidar to be more accurate for characterizing the bare earth (ground) in dense herbaceous vegetation than either terrestrial lidar or aerial SfM photogrammetry. Conversely, the manned aerial lidar did not detect grass and fine woody vegetation while the terrestrial lidar and high resolution near-distance (ground and sUAS) SfM photogrammetry detected these and were accurate. UAS SfM photogrammetry at lower spatial resolution under-estimated maximum heights in grass and shrubs. UAS and handheld SfM photogrammetry in near-distance high resolution collections had similar accuracy to terrestrial lidar for vegetation, but difficulty at measuring bare earth elevation beneath dense herbaceous cover. Combining point cloud data and derivatives (i.e., meshes and rasters) from two or more platforms allowed for more accurate measurement of herbaceous and woody vegetation (height and canopy cover) than any single technique alone. Availability and costs of manned aircraft lidar collection preclude high frequency repeatability but this is less limiting for terrestrial lidar, sUAS and handheld SfM. The post-processing of SfM photogrammetry data became the limiting factor at larger spatial scale and temporal repetition. Despite the utility of sUAS and handheld SfM for monitoring vegetation phenology and structure, their spatial extents are small relative to manned aircraft.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2144
JournalFrontiers in Plant Science
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 10 2018

Fingerprint

lidar
arid lands
photogrammetry
ecosystems
vegetation
aircraft
remote sensing
grasses
methodology
repeatability
phenology
herbivores
shrubs
chemical derivatives
canopy
monitoring

Keywords

  • Lidar
  • Structure from motion
  • SUAS
  • Terrestrial laser scanning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science

Cite this

Considerations for achieving cross-platform point cloud data fusion across different dryland ecosystem structural states. / Swetnam, Tyson L.; Gillan, Jeffrey K.; Sankey, Temuulen T.; McClaran, Mitchel; Nichols, Mary H.; Heilman, Philip; McVay, Jason.

In: Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 8, 2144, 10.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swetnam, Tyson L. ; Gillan, Jeffrey K. ; Sankey, Temuulen T. ; McClaran, Mitchel ; Nichols, Mary H. ; Heilman, Philip ; McVay, Jason. / Considerations for achieving cross-platform point cloud data fusion across different dryland ecosystem structural states. In: Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018 ; Vol. 8.
@article{d4b2ba22ed984d1bb65788bd02d91b17,
title = "Considerations for achieving cross-platform point cloud data fusion across different dryland ecosystem structural states",
abstract = "Remotely sensing recent growth, herbivory, or disturbance of herbaceous and woody vegetation in dryland ecosystems requires high spatial resolution and multi-temporal depth. Three dimensional (3D) remote sensing technologies like lidar, and techniques like structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry, each have strengths and weaknesses at detecting vegetation volume and extent, given the instrument’s ground sample distance and ease of acquisition. Yet, a combination of platforms and techniques might provide solutions that overcome the weakness of a single platform. To explore the potential for combining platforms, we compared detection bias amongst two 3D remote sensing techniques (lidar and SfM) using three different platforms [ground-based, small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS), and manned aircraft]. We found aerial lidar to be more accurate for characterizing the bare earth (ground) in dense herbaceous vegetation than either terrestrial lidar or aerial SfM photogrammetry. Conversely, the manned aerial lidar did not detect grass and fine woody vegetation while the terrestrial lidar and high resolution near-distance (ground and sUAS) SfM photogrammetry detected these and were accurate. UAS SfM photogrammetry at lower spatial resolution under-estimated maximum heights in grass and shrubs. UAS and handheld SfM photogrammetry in near-distance high resolution collections had similar accuracy to terrestrial lidar for vegetation, but difficulty at measuring bare earth elevation beneath dense herbaceous cover. Combining point cloud data and derivatives (i.e., meshes and rasters) from two or more platforms allowed for more accurate measurement of herbaceous and woody vegetation (height and canopy cover) than any single technique alone. Availability and costs of manned aircraft lidar collection preclude high frequency repeatability but this is less limiting for terrestrial lidar, sUAS and handheld SfM. The post-processing of SfM photogrammetry data became the limiting factor at larger spatial scale and temporal repetition. Despite the utility of sUAS and handheld SfM for monitoring vegetation phenology and structure, their spatial extents are small relative to manned aircraft.",
keywords = "Lidar, Structure from motion, SUAS, Terrestrial laser scanning",
author = "Swetnam, {Tyson L.} and Gillan, {Jeffrey K.} and Sankey, {Temuulen T.} and Mitchel McClaran and Nichols, {Mary H.} and Philip Heilman and Jason McVay",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "10",
doi = "10.3389/fpls.2017.02144",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Plant Science",
issn = "1664-462X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considerations for achieving cross-platform point cloud data fusion across different dryland ecosystem structural states

AU - Swetnam, Tyson L.

AU - Gillan, Jeffrey K.

AU - Sankey, Temuulen T.

AU - McClaran, Mitchel

AU - Nichols, Mary H.

AU - Heilman, Philip

AU - McVay, Jason

PY - 2018/1/10

Y1 - 2018/1/10

N2 - Remotely sensing recent growth, herbivory, or disturbance of herbaceous and woody vegetation in dryland ecosystems requires high spatial resolution and multi-temporal depth. Three dimensional (3D) remote sensing technologies like lidar, and techniques like structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry, each have strengths and weaknesses at detecting vegetation volume and extent, given the instrument’s ground sample distance and ease of acquisition. Yet, a combination of platforms and techniques might provide solutions that overcome the weakness of a single platform. To explore the potential for combining platforms, we compared detection bias amongst two 3D remote sensing techniques (lidar and SfM) using three different platforms [ground-based, small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS), and manned aircraft]. We found aerial lidar to be more accurate for characterizing the bare earth (ground) in dense herbaceous vegetation than either terrestrial lidar or aerial SfM photogrammetry. Conversely, the manned aerial lidar did not detect grass and fine woody vegetation while the terrestrial lidar and high resolution near-distance (ground and sUAS) SfM photogrammetry detected these and were accurate. UAS SfM photogrammetry at lower spatial resolution under-estimated maximum heights in grass and shrubs. UAS and handheld SfM photogrammetry in near-distance high resolution collections had similar accuracy to terrestrial lidar for vegetation, but difficulty at measuring bare earth elevation beneath dense herbaceous cover. Combining point cloud data and derivatives (i.e., meshes and rasters) from two or more platforms allowed for more accurate measurement of herbaceous and woody vegetation (height and canopy cover) than any single technique alone. Availability and costs of manned aircraft lidar collection preclude high frequency repeatability but this is less limiting for terrestrial lidar, sUAS and handheld SfM. The post-processing of SfM photogrammetry data became the limiting factor at larger spatial scale and temporal repetition. Despite the utility of sUAS and handheld SfM for monitoring vegetation phenology and structure, their spatial extents are small relative to manned aircraft.

AB - Remotely sensing recent growth, herbivory, or disturbance of herbaceous and woody vegetation in dryland ecosystems requires high spatial resolution and multi-temporal depth. Three dimensional (3D) remote sensing technologies like lidar, and techniques like structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry, each have strengths and weaknesses at detecting vegetation volume and extent, given the instrument’s ground sample distance and ease of acquisition. Yet, a combination of platforms and techniques might provide solutions that overcome the weakness of a single platform. To explore the potential for combining platforms, we compared detection bias amongst two 3D remote sensing techniques (lidar and SfM) using three different platforms [ground-based, small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS), and manned aircraft]. We found aerial lidar to be more accurate for characterizing the bare earth (ground) in dense herbaceous vegetation than either terrestrial lidar or aerial SfM photogrammetry. Conversely, the manned aerial lidar did not detect grass and fine woody vegetation while the terrestrial lidar and high resolution near-distance (ground and sUAS) SfM photogrammetry detected these and were accurate. UAS SfM photogrammetry at lower spatial resolution under-estimated maximum heights in grass and shrubs. UAS and handheld SfM photogrammetry in near-distance high resolution collections had similar accuracy to terrestrial lidar for vegetation, but difficulty at measuring bare earth elevation beneath dense herbaceous cover. Combining point cloud data and derivatives (i.e., meshes and rasters) from two or more platforms allowed for more accurate measurement of herbaceous and woody vegetation (height and canopy cover) than any single technique alone. Availability and costs of manned aircraft lidar collection preclude high frequency repeatability but this is less limiting for terrestrial lidar, sUAS and handheld SfM. The post-processing of SfM photogrammetry data became the limiting factor at larger spatial scale and temporal repetition. Despite the utility of sUAS and handheld SfM for monitoring vegetation phenology and structure, their spatial extents are small relative to manned aircraft.

KW - Lidar

KW - Structure from motion

KW - SUAS

KW - Terrestrial laser scanning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041309915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041309915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2017.02144

DO - 10.3389/fpls.2017.02144

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041309915

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Plant Science

JF - Frontiers in Plant Science

SN - 1664-462X

M1 - 2144

ER -