Considerations for practice-based research: A cross-sectional survey of chiropractic, acupuncture and massage practices

Lysbeth Floden, Amy Howerter, Eva Matthews, Mark Nichter, James K Cunningham, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Judith S Gordon, Myra L Muramoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has steadily increased globally over the past two decades and is increasingly playing a role in the healthcare system in the United States. CAM practice-based effectiveness research requires an understanding of the settings in which CAM practitioners provide services. This paper describes and quantifies practice environment characteristics for a cross-sectional sample of doctors of chiropractic (DCs), licensed acupuncturists (LAcs), and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in the United States. Methods: Using a cross-sectional telephone survey of DCs (n = 32), LAcs (n = 70), and LMTs (n = 184) in the Tucson, AZ metropolitan area, we collected data about each location where practitioners work, as well as measures on practitioner and practice characteristics including: patient volume, number of locations where practitioners worked, CAM practitioner types working at each location, and business models of practice. Results: The majority of practitioners reported having one practice location (93.8% of DCs, 80% of LAcs and 59.8% of LMTs) where they treat patients. Patient volume/week was related to practitioner type; DCs saw 83.13 (SD = 49.29) patients/week, LAcs saw 22.29 (SD = 16.88) patients/week, and LMTs saw 14.21 (SD =10.25) patients per week. Practitioners completed surveys for N = 388 practice locations. Many CAM practices were found to be multidisciplinary and/or have more than one practitioner: 9/35 (25.7%) chiropractic practices, 24/87 (27.6%) acupuncture practices, and 141/266 (53.0%) massage practices. Practice business models across CAM practitioner types were heterogeneous, e.g. sole proprietor, employee, partner, and independent contractor. Conclusions: CAM practices vary across and within disciplines in ways that can significantly impact design and implementation of practice-based research. CAM research and intervention programs need to be mindful of the heterogeneity of CAM practices in order to create appropriate interventions, study designs, and implementation plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number140
JournalBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2 2015

Fingerprint

Chiropractic
Massage
Acupuncture
Complementary Therapies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Acupuncturists
  • Chiropractors
  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Cross-sectional survey
  • Massage therapists
  • Practice patterns
  • Practice-based research
  • Practitioners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Considerations for practice-based research : A cross-sectional survey of chiropractic, acupuncture and massage practices. / Floden, Lysbeth; Howerter, Amy; Matthews, Eva; Nichter, Mark; Cunningham, James K; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl; Gordon, Judith S; Muramoto, Myra L.

In: BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 1, 140, 02.05.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4686d8d713164621b27b238dc5ac88f6,
title = "Considerations for practice-based research: A cross-sectional survey of chiropractic, acupuncture and massage practices",
abstract = "Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has steadily increased globally over the past two decades and is increasingly playing a role in the healthcare system in the United States. CAM practice-based effectiveness research requires an understanding of the settings in which CAM practitioners provide services. This paper describes and quantifies practice environment characteristics for a cross-sectional sample of doctors of chiropractic (DCs), licensed acupuncturists (LAcs), and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in the United States. Methods: Using a cross-sectional telephone survey of DCs (n = 32), LAcs (n = 70), and LMTs (n = 184) in the Tucson, AZ metropolitan area, we collected data about each location where practitioners work, as well as measures on practitioner and practice characteristics including: patient volume, number of locations where practitioners worked, CAM practitioner types working at each location, and business models of practice. Results: The majority of practitioners reported having one practice location (93.8{\%} of DCs, 80{\%} of LAcs and 59.8{\%} of LMTs) where they treat patients. Patient volume/week was related to practitioner type; DCs saw 83.13 (SD = 49.29) patients/week, LAcs saw 22.29 (SD = 16.88) patients/week, and LMTs saw 14.21 (SD =10.25) patients per week. Practitioners completed surveys for N = 388 practice locations. Many CAM practices were found to be multidisciplinary and/or have more than one practitioner: 9/35 (25.7{\%}) chiropractic practices, 24/87 (27.6{\%}) acupuncture practices, and 141/266 (53.0{\%}) massage practices. Practice business models across CAM practitioner types were heterogeneous, e.g. sole proprietor, employee, partner, and independent contractor. Conclusions: CAM practices vary across and within disciplines in ways that can significantly impact design and implementation of practice-based research. CAM research and intervention programs need to be mindful of the heterogeneity of CAM practices in order to create appropriate interventions, study designs, and implementation plans.",
keywords = "Acupuncturists, Chiropractors, Complementary and alternative medicine, Cross-sectional survey, Massage therapists, Practice patterns, Practice-based research, Practitioners",
author = "Lysbeth Floden and Amy Howerter and Eva Matthews and Mark Nichter and Cunningham, {James K} and Cheryl Ritenbaugh and Gordon, {Judith S} and Muramoto, {Myra L}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1186/s12906-015-0659-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine",
issn = "1472-6882",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considerations for practice-based research

T2 - A cross-sectional survey of chiropractic, acupuncture and massage practices

AU - Floden, Lysbeth

AU - Howerter, Amy

AU - Matthews, Eva

AU - Nichter, Mark

AU - Cunningham, James K

AU - Ritenbaugh, Cheryl

AU - Gordon, Judith S

AU - Muramoto, Myra L

PY - 2015/5/2

Y1 - 2015/5/2

N2 - Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has steadily increased globally over the past two decades and is increasingly playing a role in the healthcare system in the United States. CAM practice-based effectiveness research requires an understanding of the settings in which CAM practitioners provide services. This paper describes and quantifies practice environment characteristics for a cross-sectional sample of doctors of chiropractic (DCs), licensed acupuncturists (LAcs), and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in the United States. Methods: Using a cross-sectional telephone survey of DCs (n = 32), LAcs (n = 70), and LMTs (n = 184) in the Tucson, AZ metropolitan area, we collected data about each location where practitioners work, as well as measures on practitioner and practice characteristics including: patient volume, number of locations where practitioners worked, CAM practitioner types working at each location, and business models of practice. Results: The majority of practitioners reported having one practice location (93.8% of DCs, 80% of LAcs and 59.8% of LMTs) where they treat patients. Patient volume/week was related to practitioner type; DCs saw 83.13 (SD = 49.29) patients/week, LAcs saw 22.29 (SD = 16.88) patients/week, and LMTs saw 14.21 (SD =10.25) patients per week. Practitioners completed surveys for N = 388 practice locations. Many CAM practices were found to be multidisciplinary and/or have more than one practitioner: 9/35 (25.7%) chiropractic practices, 24/87 (27.6%) acupuncture practices, and 141/266 (53.0%) massage practices. Practice business models across CAM practitioner types were heterogeneous, e.g. sole proprietor, employee, partner, and independent contractor. Conclusions: CAM practices vary across and within disciplines in ways that can significantly impact design and implementation of practice-based research. CAM research and intervention programs need to be mindful of the heterogeneity of CAM practices in order to create appropriate interventions, study designs, and implementation plans.

AB - Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has steadily increased globally over the past two decades and is increasingly playing a role in the healthcare system in the United States. CAM practice-based effectiveness research requires an understanding of the settings in which CAM practitioners provide services. This paper describes and quantifies practice environment characteristics for a cross-sectional sample of doctors of chiropractic (DCs), licensed acupuncturists (LAcs), and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in the United States. Methods: Using a cross-sectional telephone survey of DCs (n = 32), LAcs (n = 70), and LMTs (n = 184) in the Tucson, AZ metropolitan area, we collected data about each location where practitioners work, as well as measures on practitioner and practice characteristics including: patient volume, number of locations where practitioners worked, CAM practitioner types working at each location, and business models of practice. Results: The majority of practitioners reported having one practice location (93.8% of DCs, 80% of LAcs and 59.8% of LMTs) where they treat patients. Patient volume/week was related to practitioner type; DCs saw 83.13 (SD = 49.29) patients/week, LAcs saw 22.29 (SD = 16.88) patients/week, and LMTs saw 14.21 (SD =10.25) patients per week. Practitioners completed surveys for N = 388 practice locations. Many CAM practices were found to be multidisciplinary and/or have more than one practitioner: 9/35 (25.7%) chiropractic practices, 24/87 (27.6%) acupuncture practices, and 141/266 (53.0%) massage practices. Practice business models across CAM practitioner types were heterogeneous, e.g. sole proprietor, employee, partner, and independent contractor. Conclusions: CAM practices vary across and within disciplines in ways that can significantly impact design and implementation of practice-based research. CAM research and intervention programs need to be mindful of the heterogeneity of CAM practices in order to create appropriate interventions, study designs, and implementation plans.

KW - Acupuncturists

KW - Chiropractors

KW - Complementary and alternative medicine

KW - Cross-sectional survey

KW - Massage therapists

KW - Practice patterns

KW - Practice-based research

KW - Practitioners

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929156380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929156380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12906-015-0659-7

DO - 10.1186/s12906-015-0659-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 25933801

AN - SCOPUS:84929156380

VL - 15

JO - BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

JF - BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

SN - 1472-6882

IS - 1

M1 - 140

ER -