Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation

M. C. McCarthy, Brian Enquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

184 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Optimal partitioning theory (OPT) suggests that plants should allocate biomass to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource. An implied assumption of this is that there are trade-offs in allocation between leaf, stem and root functions. 2. Recently, an alternative approach, allometric biomass partitioning theory (APT), was developed to predict how plants should divide their metabolic production between leaves, stems and roots, based on the constraints of body size. APT predicts that, for an allometrically ideal plant, leaf mass should scale to the 3/4th power of body size, and stem and root mass should scale isometrically to body size. 3. In this study, we combine OPT with APT by investigating biomass partitioning not accounted for by allometric constraints across broad environmental gradients. 4. Intraspecific variability in biomass allocation shows correlations with environmental factors that would be predicted by OPT. However, interspecifically, these patterns either do not appear or are greatly reduced. 5. Our study suggests that, after size is accounted for, intraspecific residual variation in biomass allocation may be partially explained by environmental factors in a manner consistent with OPT. However, the particular patterns vary between species, obscuring large-scale patterns. 6. In summary, differences due to environmental variability can be incorporated with allocation patterns related to total mass to help understand how plants should allocate biomass in response to changes in both size and environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-720
Number of pages8
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

biomass allocation
dry matter partitioning
partitioning
biomass
body size
stem
stems
environmental factor
leaves
environmental factors
environmental gradient
phytomass
resource

Keywords

  • Biomass partitioning
  • Environmental variation
  • Optimal partitioning
  • Plant allometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. / McCarthy, M. C.; Enquist, Brian.

In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 08.2007, p. 713-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f5482042969428c80ab97b7870f9774,
title = "Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation",
abstract = "1. Optimal partitioning theory (OPT) suggests that plants should allocate biomass to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource. An implied assumption of this is that there are trade-offs in allocation between leaf, stem and root functions. 2. Recently, an alternative approach, allometric biomass partitioning theory (APT), was developed to predict how plants should divide their metabolic production between leaves, stems and roots, based on the constraints of body size. APT predicts that, for an allometrically ideal plant, leaf mass should scale to the 3/4th power of body size, and stem and root mass should scale isometrically to body size. 3. In this study, we combine OPT with APT by investigating biomass partitioning not accounted for by allometric constraints across broad environmental gradients. 4. Intraspecific variability in biomass allocation shows correlations with environmental factors that would be predicted by OPT. However, interspecifically, these patterns either do not appear or are greatly reduced. 5. Our study suggests that, after size is accounted for, intraspecific residual variation in biomass allocation may be partially explained by environmental factors in a manner consistent with OPT. However, the particular patterns vary between species, obscuring large-scale patterns. 6. In summary, differences due to environmental variability can be incorporated with allocation patterns related to total mass to help understand how plants should allocate biomass in response to changes in both size and environment.",
keywords = "Biomass partitioning, Environmental variation, Optimal partitioning, Plant allometry",
author = "McCarthy, {M. C.} and Brian Enquist",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01276.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "713--720",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation

AU - McCarthy, M. C.

AU - Enquist, Brian

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - 1. Optimal partitioning theory (OPT) suggests that plants should allocate biomass to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource. An implied assumption of this is that there are trade-offs in allocation between leaf, stem and root functions. 2. Recently, an alternative approach, allometric biomass partitioning theory (APT), was developed to predict how plants should divide their metabolic production between leaves, stems and roots, based on the constraints of body size. APT predicts that, for an allometrically ideal plant, leaf mass should scale to the 3/4th power of body size, and stem and root mass should scale isometrically to body size. 3. In this study, we combine OPT with APT by investigating biomass partitioning not accounted for by allometric constraints across broad environmental gradients. 4. Intraspecific variability in biomass allocation shows correlations with environmental factors that would be predicted by OPT. However, interspecifically, these patterns either do not appear or are greatly reduced. 5. Our study suggests that, after size is accounted for, intraspecific residual variation in biomass allocation may be partially explained by environmental factors in a manner consistent with OPT. However, the particular patterns vary between species, obscuring large-scale patterns. 6. In summary, differences due to environmental variability can be incorporated with allocation patterns related to total mass to help understand how plants should allocate biomass in response to changes in both size and environment.

AB - 1. Optimal partitioning theory (OPT) suggests that plants should allocate biomass to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource. An implied assumption of this is that there are trade-offs in allocation between leaf, stem and root functions. 2. Recently, an alternative approach, allometric biomass partitioning theory (APT), was developed to predict how plants should divide their metabolic production between leaves, stems and roots, based on the constraints of body size. APT predicts that, for an allometrically ideal plant, leaf mass should scale to the 3/4th power of body size, and stem and root mass should scale isometrically to body size. 3. In this study, we combine OPT with APT by investigating biomass partitioning not accounted for by allometric constraints across broad environmental gradients. 4. Intraspecific variability in biomass allocation shows correlations with environmental factors that would be predicted by OPT. However, interspecifically, these patterns either do not appear or are greatly reduced. 5. Our study suggests that, after size is accounted for, intraspecific residual variation in biomass allocation may be partially explained by environmental factors in a manner consistent with OPT. However, the particular patterns vary between species, obscuring large-scale patterns. 6. In summary, differences due to environmental variability can be incorporated with allocation patterns related to total mass to help understand how plants should allocate biomass in response to changes in both size and environment.

KW - Biomass partitioning

KW - Environmental variation

KW - Optimal partitioning

KW - Plant allometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447341152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447341152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01276.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01276.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 713

EP - 720

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 4

ER -