Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses

Charles Chien Jer Lin, Sandiway Fong, Thomas G Bever

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the construction of filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses (PRCs), which are different from typical relative clauses (RCs) considered in the literature because Chinese PRCs contain no overt missing arguments (i.e. gaps). As Chinese RCs are prenominal, the gaps precede the head noun fillers. It has been suggested that when the gaps are close to the filler, the dependency is easier to construct; there is, thus, a processing advantage for object RCs over subject RCs (Hsiao & Gibson, 2003). The PRC data presented show that even in Chinese, a language with RCs that are head-final, it is possible to have a subject gap preference (over object) despite the fact that the subject is further away from the filler. Three experiments confirmed this subject preference with respect to naturalness and grammaticality ratings (Experiment 1), paraphrasing tasks (Experiment 2), and self-paced reading tasks (Experiment 3). The results support a theory of gap-searching which operates top down. Issues regarding locality and canonicity will also be discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation
StatePublished - 2005
Event19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 19 - Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China
Duration: Dec 1 2005Dec 3 2005

Other

Other19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 19
CountryTaiwan, Province of China
CityTaipei
Period12/1/0512/3/05

Fingerprint

Fillers
Experiments
Possessor
Filler-gap Dependencies
Relative Clauses
Processing
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Lin, C. C. J., Fong, S., & Bever, T. G. (2005). Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses. In PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation

Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses. / Lin, Charles Chien Jer; Fong, Sandiway; Bever, Thomas G.

PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 2005.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Lin, CCJ, Fong, S & Bever, TG 2005, Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses. in PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 19, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China, 12/1/05.
Lin CCJ, Fong S, Bever TG. Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses. In PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 2005
Lin, Charles Chien Jer ; Fong, Sandiway ; Bever, Thomas G. / Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses. PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 2005.
@inproceedings{08819d5a26e04cd78e6ac455c141d8cc,
title = "Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses",
abstract = "This article explores the construction of filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses (PRCs), which are different from typical relative clauses (RCs) considered in the literature because Chinese PRCs contain no overt missing arguments (i.e. gaps). As Chinese RCs are prenominal, the gaps precede the head noun fillers. It has been suggested that when the gaps are close to the filler, the dependency is easier to construct; there is, thus, a processing advantage for object RCs over subject RCs (Hsiao & Gibson, 2003). The PRC data presented show that even in Chinese, a language with RCs that are head-final, it is possible to have a subject gap preference (over object) despite the fact that the subject is further away from the filler. Three experiments confirmed this subject preference with respect to naturalness and grammaticality ratings (Experiment 1), paraphrasing tasks (Experiment 2), and self-paced reading tasks (Experiment 3). The results support a theory of gap-searching which operates top down. Issues regarding locality and canonicity will also be discussed.",
author = "Lin, {Charles Chien Jer} and Sandiway Fong and Bever, {Thomas G}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses

AU - Lin, Charles Chien Jer

AU - Fong, Sandiway

AU - Bever, Thomas G

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This article explores the construction of filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses (PRCs), which are different from typical relative clauses (RCs) considered in the literature because Chinese PRCs contain no overt missing arguments (i.e. gaps). As Chinese RCs are prenominal, the gaps precede the head noun fillers. It has been suggested that when the gaps are close to the filler, the dependency is easier to construct; there is, thus, a processing advantage for object RCs over subject RCs (Hsiao & Gibson, 2003). The PRC data presented show that even in Chinese, a language with RCs that are head-final, it is possible to have a subject gap preference (over object) despite the fact that the subject is further away from the filler. Three experiments confirmed this subject preference with respect to naturalness and grammaticality ratings (Experiment 1), paraphrasing tasks (Experiment 2), and self-paced reading tasks (Experiment 3). The results support a theory of gap-searching which operates top down. Issues regarding locality and canonicity will also be discussed.

AB - This article explores the construction of filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses (PRCs), which are different from typical relative clauses (RCs) considered in the literature because Chinese PRCs contain no overt missing arguments (i.e. gaps). As Chinese RCs are prenominal, the gaps precede the head noun fillers. It has been suggested that when the gaps are close to the filler, the dependency is easier to construct; there is, thus, a processing advantage for object RCs over subject RCs (Hsiao & Gibson, 2003). The PRC data presented show that even in Chinese, a language with RCs that are head-final, it is possible to have a subject gap preference (over object) despite the fact that the subject is further away from the filler. Three experiments confirmed this subject preference with respect to naturalness and grammaticality ratings (Experiment 1), paraphrasing tasks (Experiment 2), and self-paced reading tasks (Experiment 3). The results support a theory of gap-searching which operates top down. Issues regarding locality and canonicity will also be discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864296337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864296337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84864296337

BT - PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation

ER -