Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory

Chad Van Schoelandt, Gerald F Gaus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Functionalism sees a conception of justice as not merely an abstract standard or value. Instead, members of society must be able to use a conception of justice for some social function. This chapter’s central concern is to better understand the functionalist approach to justice through an examination of this idea in an interpretation of John Rawls’s work. We seek to draw out key themes in this functionalist interpretation of Rawls’s work and indicate some of the implications of a functionalist project such as the fact that functionalism may require the metrics of distributive justice to significantly differ from the metrics most relevant to personal well-being or true advantage under a moral philosophic account. The final sections highlight the potential of functionalism as a basis for a progressive research agenda, and address concerns about ideal theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNew Perspectives on Distributive Justice
Subtitle of host publicationDeep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus
Publisherde Gruyter
Pages403-422
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9783110537369
ISBN (Print)9783110535877
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Functionalism
Functionalist
Justice
Moral Theory
Distributive Justice
Conception
Well-being
Research Agenda
Social Function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Van Schoelandt, C., & Gaus, G. F. (2018). Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory. In New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus (pp. 403-422). de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537369-025

Constructing public distributive justice : On the method of functionalist moral theory. / Van Schoelandt, Chad; Gaus, Gerald F.

New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus. de Gruyter, 2018. p. 403-422.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Van Schoelandt, C & Gaus, GF 2018, Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory. in New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus. de Gruyter, pp. 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537369-025
Van Schoelandt C, Gaus GF. Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory. In New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus. de Gruyter. 2018. p. 403-422 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537369-025
Van Schoelandt, Chad ; Gaus, Gerald F. / Constructing public distributive justice : On the method of functionalist moral theory. New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus. de Gruyter, 2018. pp. 403-422
@inbook{aac223a84aa74e7fb240a401b31bc922,
title = "Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory",
abstract = "Functionalism sees a conception of justice as not merely an abstract standard or value. Instead, members of society must be able to use a conception of justice for some social function. This chapter’s central concern is to better understand the functionalist approach to justice through an examination of this idea in an interpretation of John Rawls’s work. We seek to draw out key themes in this functionalist interpretation of Rawls’s work and indicate some of the implications of a functionalist project such as the fact that functionalism may require the metrics of distributive justice to significantly differ from the metrics most relevant to personal well-being or true advantage under a moral philosophic account. The final sections highlight the potential of functionalism as a basis for a progressive research agenda, and address concerns about ideal theory.",
author = "{Van Schoelandt}, Chad and Gaus, {Gerald F}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/9783110537369-025",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783110535877",
pages = "403--422",
booktitle = "New Perspectives on Distributive Justice",
publisher = "de Gruyter",
address = "Germany",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Constructing public distributive justice

T2 - On the method of functionalist moral theory

AU - Van Schoelandt, Chad

AU - Gaus, Gerald F

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Functionalism sees a conception of justice as not merely an abstract standard or value. Instead, members of society must be able to use a conception of justice for some social function. This chapter’s central concern is to better understand the functionalist approach to justice through an examination of this idea in an interpretation of John Rawls’s work. We seek to draw out key themes in this functionalist interpretation of Rawls’s work and indicate some of the implications of a functionalist project such as the fact that functionalism may require the metrics of distributive justice to significantly differ from the metrics most relevant to personal well-being or true advantage under a moral philosophic account. The final sections highlight the potential of functionalism as a basis for a progressive research agenda, and address concerns about ideal theory.

AB - Functionalism sees a conception of justice as not merely an abstract standard or value. Instead, members of society must be able to use a conception of justice for some social function. This chapter’s central concern is to better understand the functionalist approach to justice through an examination of this idea in an interpretation of John Rawls’s work. We seek to draw out key themes in this functionalist interpretation of Rawls’s work and indicate some of the implications of a functionalist project such as the fact that functionalism may require the metrics of distributive justice to significantly differ from the metrics most relevant to personal well-being or true advantage under a moral philosophic account. The final sections highlight the potential of functionalism as a basis for a progressive research agenda, and address concerns about ideal theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057974740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057974740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/9783110537369-025

DO - 10.1515/9783110537369-025

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85057974740

SN - 9783110535877

SP - 403

EP - 422

BT - New Perspectives on Distributive Justice

PB - de Gruyter

ER -