Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory

Chad Van Schoelandt, Gerald F Gaus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Functionalism sees a conception of justice as not merely an abstract standard or value. Instead, members of society must be able to use a conception of justice for some social function. This chapter’s central concern is to better understand the functionalist approach to justice through an examination of this idea in an interpretation of John Rawls’s work. We seek to draw out key themes in this functionalist interpretation of Rawls’s work and indicate some of the implications of a functionalist project such as the fact that functionalism may require the metrics of distributive justice to significantly differ from the metrics most relevant to personal well-being or true advantage under a moral philosophic account. The final sections highlight the potential of functionalism as a basis for a progressive research agenda, and address concerns about ideal theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNew Perspectives on Distributive Justice
Subtitle of host publicationDeep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus
Publisherde Gruyter
Pages403-422
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9783110537369
ISBN (Print)9783110535877
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Van Schoelandt, C., & Gaus, G. F. (2018). Constructing public distributive justice: On the method of functionalist moral theory. In New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus (pp. 403-422). de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537369-025