Consumption-Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint

Justin Kitzes, Eric Berlow, Erin Conlisk, Karlheinz Erb, Katsunori Iha, Neo D Martinez, Erica A. Newman, Christoph Plutzar, Adam B. Smith, John Harte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long-term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional wildlife footprints, while per-person footprints are highest in Mongolia, Australia, Botswana, and the United Arab Emirates. A US$100 purchase of bovine meat or rice products occupies approximately 0.1 km2 of wild bird ranges, displacing 1-2 individual birds, for 1 year. Globally significant importer regions, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France, have large footprints that drive wildlife losses elsewhere in the world and represent important targets for consumption-focused conservation attention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalConservation Letters
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

footprint
targeting
wildlife
wild birds
biodiversity
bird
rice products
economics
United Arab Emirates
Botswana
Mongolia
forest products
meat products
United Kingdom
forest product
foods
France
Germany
Italy
meat

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Consumption
  • Economics
  • Footprint
  • GIS
  • Human ecology
  • Input output
  • Land use
  • Life cycle
  • Spatial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Consumption-Based Conservation Targeting : Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint. / Kitzes, Justin; Berlow, Eric; Conlisk, Erin; Erb, Karlheinz; Iha, Katsunori; Martinez, Neo D; Newman, Erica A.; Plutzar, Christoph; Smith, Adam B.; Harte, John.

In: Conservation Letters, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kitzes, Justin ; Berlow, Eric ; Conlisk, Erin ; Erb, Karlheinz ; Iha, Katsunori ; Martinez, Neo D ; Newman, Erica A. ; Plutzar, Christoph ; Smith, Adam B. ; Harte, John. / Consumption-Based Conservation Targeting : Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint. In: Conservation Letters. 2016.
@article{8a14729984d246b5948af79ff1838197,
title = "Consumption-Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint",
abstract = "Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long-term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional wildlife footprints, while per-person footprints are highest in Mongolia, Australia, Botswana, and the United Arab Emirates. A US$100 purchase of bovine meat or rice products occupies approximately 0.1 km2 of wild bird ranges, displacing 1-2 individual birds, for 1 year. Globally significant importer regions, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France, have large footprints that drive wildlife losses elsewhere in the world and represent important targets for consumption-focused conservation attention.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Consumption, Economics, Footprint, GIS, Human ecology, Input output, Land use, Life cycle, Spatial",
author = "Justin Kitzes and Eric Berlow and Erin Conlisk and Karlheinz Erb and Katsunori Iha and Martinez, {Neo D} and Newman, {Erica A.} and Christoph Plutzar and Smith, {Adam B.} and John Harte",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/con4.12321",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Conservation Letters",
issn = "1755-263X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumption-Based Conservation Targeting

T2 - Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint

AU - Kitzes, Justin

AU - Berlow, Eric

AU - Conlisk, Erin

AU - Erb, Karlheinz

AU - Iha, Katsunori

AU - Martinez, Neo D

AU - Newman, Erica A.

AU - Plutzar, Christoph

AU - Smith, Adam B.

AU - Harte, John

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long-term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional wildlife footprints, while per-person footprints are highest in Mongolia, Australia, Botswana, and the United Arab Emirates. A US$100 purchase of bovine meat or rice products occupies approximately 0.1 km2 of wild bird ranges, displacing 1-2 individual birds, for 1 year. Globally significant importer regions, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France, have large footprints that drive wildlife losses elsewhere in the world and represent important targets for consumption-focused conservation attention.

AB - Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long-term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional wildlife footprints, while per-person footprints are highest in Mongolia, Australia, Botswana, and the United Arab Emirates. A US$100 purchase of bovine meat or rice products occupies approximately 0.1 km2 of wild bird ranges, displacing 1-2 individual birds, for 1 year. Globally significant importer regions, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France, have large footprints that drive wildlife losses elsewhere in the world and represent important targets for consumption-focused conservation attention.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Consumption

KW - Economics

KW - Footprint

KW - GIS

KW - Human ecology

KW - Input output

KW - Land use

KW - Life cycle

KW - Spatial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002701034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002701034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/con4.12321

DO - 10.1111/con4.12321

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002701034

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

SN - 1755-263X

ER -