Contesting the Unethical City: Land Dispossession and Corruption Narratives in Urban India

Sapana L D Doshi, Malini Ranganathan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this age of global inequality, how people talk of corruption matters. This article examines the role of corruption narratives in struggles against land enclosures (“land grabs”) in two Indian cities. Drawing on ethnographic research on land grabs in Mumbai and Bangalore and critical corruption and geography literatures, we argue that corruption talk by slum-based and lower middle-class residents and activists advances an ethical critique of contemporary capitalism. In our cases, corruption discourse upends mainstream development agendas that narrowly equate corruption with individual acts of bribery and the long-standing notion in India that corruption manifests mainly among the poor and lower rungs of the state. Instead, we find that “corruption” serves as a cultural, semantic, and moral rubric that expresses and shapes a sense of structural injustice in this moment of sharpening urban inequality. Specifically, corruption talk is leveraged to identify and challenge the mechanisms underlying elite land grabs and the hypocritical policing of the poor. Corruption discourse also provides a meaningful framework to voice discontent over the betrayal of the “public interest”—defined here as housing and economic dispossession. Taking care not to unequivocally celebrate its progressive potential, we find that corruption discourse can be and has been repurposed in disruptive ways. We therefore posit the need to examine how corruption politics are expanding—rather than disappearing—from geographies of advanced capitalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-199
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of the American Association of Geographers
Volume107
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2017

Fingerprint

corruption
India
narrative
capitalism
land
city
discourse
capitalist society
geography
slum
middle class
politics
elite
housing
semantics

Keywords

  • accumulation by dispossession
  • corruption discourse
  • informality
  • land struggles
  • postcolonial urbanism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Contesting the Unethical City : Land Dispossession and Corruption Narratives in Urban India. / Doshi, Sapana L D; Ranganathan, Malini.

In: Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 107, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 183-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ea188c4a15a44979709a2e3bf87bf60,
title = "Contesting the Unethical City: Land Dispossession and Corruption Narratives in Urban India",
abstract = "In this age of global inequality, how people talk of corruption matters. This article examines the role of corruption narratives in struggles against land enclosures (“land grabs”) in two Indian cities. Drawing on ethnographic research on land grabs in Mumbai and Bangalore and critical corruption and geography literatures, we argue that corruption talk by slum-based and lower middle-class residents and activists advances an ethical critique of contemporary capitalism. In our cases, corruption discourse upends mainstream development agendas that narrowly equate corruption with individual acts of bribery and the long-standing notion in India that corruption manifests mainly among the poor and lower rungs of the state. Instead, we find that “corruption” serves as a cultural, semantic, and moral rubric that expresses and shapes a sense of structural injustice in this moment of sharpening urban inequality. Specifically, corruption talk is leveraged to identify and challenge the mechanisms underlying elite land grabs and the hypocritical policing of the poor. Corruption discourse also provides a meaningful framework to voice discontent over the betrayal of the “public interest”—defined here as housing and economic dispossession. Taking care not to unequivocally celebrate its progressive potential, we find that corruption discourse can be and has been repurposed in disruptive ways. We therefore posit the need to examine how corruption politics are expanding—rather than disappearing—from geographies of advanced capitalism.",
keywords = "accumulation by dispossession, corruption discourse, informality, land struggles, postcolonial urbanism",
author = "Doshi, {Sapana L D} and Malini Ranganathan",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/24694452.2016.1226124",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "183--199",
journal = "Annals of the American Association of Geographers",
issn = "2469-4452",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contesting the Unethical City

T2 - Land Dispossession and Corruption Narratives in Urban India

AU - Doshi, Sapana L D

AU - Ranganathan, Malini

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - In this age of global inequality, how people talk of corruption matters. This article examines the role of corruption narratives in struggles against land enclosures (“land grabs”) in two Indian cities. Drawing on ethnographic research on land grabs in Mumbai and Bangalore and critical corruption and geography literatures, we argue that corruption talk by slum-based and lower middle-class residents and activists advances an ethical critique of contemporary capitalism. In our cases, corruption discourse upends mainstream development agendas that narrowly equate corruption with individual acts of bribery and the long-standing notion in India that corruption manifests mainly among the poor and lower rungs of the state. Instead, we find that “corruption” serves as a cultural, semantic, and moral rubric that expresses and shapes a sense of structural injustice in this moment of sharpening urban inequality. Specifically, corruption talk is leveraged to identify and challenge the mechanisms underlying elite land grabs and the hypocritical policing of the poor. Corruption discourse also provides a meaningful framework to voice discontent over the betrayal of the “public interest”—defined here as housing and economic dispossession. Taking care not to unequivocally celebrate its progressive potential, we find that corruption discourse can be and has been repurposed in disruptive ways. We therefore posit the need to examine how corruption politics are expanding—rather than disappearing—from geographies of advanced capitalism.

AB - In this age of global inequality, how people talk of corruption matters. This article examines the role of corruption narratives in struggles against land enclosures (“land grabs”) in two Indian cities. Drawing on ethnographic research on land grabs in Mumbai and Bangalore and critical corruption and geography literatures, we argue that corruption talk by slum-based and lower middle-class residents and activists advances an ethical critique of contemporary capitalism. In our cases, corruption discourse upends mainstream development agendas that narrowly equate corruption with individual acts of bribery and the long-standing notion in India that corruption manifests mainly among the poor and lower rungs of the state. Instead, we find that “corruption” serves as a cultural, semantic, and moral rubric that expresses and shapes a sense of structural injustice in this moment of sharpening urban inequality. Specifically, corruption talk is leveraged to identify and challenge the mechanisms underlying elite land grabs and the hypocritical policing of the poor. Corruption discourse also provides a meaningful framework to voice discontent over the betrayal of the “public interest”—defined here as housing and economic dispossession. Taking care not to unequivocally celebrate its progressive potential, we find that corruption discourse can be and has been repurposed in disruptive ways. We therefore posit the need to examine how corruption politics are expanding—rather than disappearing—from geographies of advanced capitalism.

KW - accumulation by dispossession

KW - corruption discourse

KW - informality

KW - land struggles

KW - postcolonial urbanism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990964617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990964617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1226124

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1226124

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990964617

VL - 107

SP - 183

EP - 199

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

SN - 2469-4452

IS - 1

ER -