Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions

Jerel E Slaughter, Jessica Bagger, Andrew Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The decoy effect occurs when preferences between two alternatives reverse as a result of the manipulation of a third alternative (i.e., a decoy) such that it is dominated by only one of the two original alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated this effect in employee selection decisions, but only when decisions were made by individuals. The present investigation was designed to test the generalizability of the phenomenon to decisions made by groups, and to determine the influence of process and outcome accountability on the decoy effect. Results showed that the overall decoy effect held for both individual and group decisions. However, for both individuals and groups, the decoy effect held only when decision makers knew they would have to justify their decision processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-59
Number of pages13
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Research
Employee selection
Context effects

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Boundary conditions
  • Context effects
  • Employee selection
  • Group decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions. / Slaughter, Jerel E; Bagger, Jessica; Li, Andrew.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 100, No. 1, 05.2006, p. 47-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c675d227fe98444b8daa24a148e4f2d2,
title = "Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions",
abstract = "The decoy effect occurs when preferences between two alternatives reverse as a result of the manipulation of a third alternative (i.e., a decoy) such that it is dominated by only one of the two original alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated this effect in employee selection decisions, but only when decisions were made by individuals. The present investigation was designed to test the generalizability of the phenomenon to decisions made by groups, and to determine the influence of process and outcome accountability on the decoy effect. Results showed that the overall decoy effect held for both individual and group decisions. However, for both individuals and groups, the decoy effect held only when decision makers knew they would have to justify their decision processes.",
keywords = "Accountability, Boundary conditions, Context effects, Employee selection, Group decision making",
author = "Slaughter, {Jerel E} and Jessica Bagger and Andrew Li",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "47--59",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions

AU - Slaughter, Jerel E

AU - Bagger, Jessica

AU - Li, Andrew

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - The decoy effect occurs when preferences between two alternatives reverse as a result of the manipulation of a third alternative (i.e., a decoy) such that it is dominated by only one of the two original alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated this effect in employee selection decisions, but only when decisions were made by individuals. The present investigation was designed to test the generalizability of the phenomenon to decisions made by groups, and to determine the influence of process and outcome accountability on the decoy effect. Results showed that the overall decoy effect held for both individual and group decisions. However, for both individuals and groups, the decoy effect held only when decision makers knew they would have to justify their decision processes.

AB - The decoy effect occurs when preferences between two alternatives reverse as a result of the manipulation of a third alternative (i.e., a decoy) such that it is dominated by only one of the two original alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated this effect in employee selection decisions, but only when decisions were made by individuals. The present investigation was designed to test the generalizability of the phenomenon to decisions made by groups, and to determine the influence of process and outcome accountability on the decoy effect. Results showed that the overall decoy effect held for both individual and group decisions. However, for both individuals and groups, the decoy effect held only when decision makers knew they would have to justify their decision processes.

KW - Accountability

KW - Boundary conditions

KW - Context effects

KW - Employee selection

KW - Group decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645905132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645905132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645905132

VL - 100

SP - 47

EP - 59

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -