Continuous oscillation: Outcome in critically III patients

Gayle A. Traver, Martha L. Tyler, Leonard D. Hudson, Duane L. Sherrill, Stuart F. Quan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare turning by an oscillating bed to standard 2-hour turning. Outcomes were survival, length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of pneumonia. Methods: One hundred and three intensive care patients were randomly assigned to standard turning or turning by an oscillating bed. Data, collected at baseline, daily for 7 days, and then three times weekly until study discharge, included demographics, initial Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, ventilatory/gas exchange parameters, indicators of pneumonia, nursing measures, and chest roentgenograph. Results: There were no significant differences for LOS, duration of ventilation, nor incidence of pneumonia. Higher survival for subjects on the oscillating bed reached borderline significance (P = .056) for subjects with APACHE II greater than or equal to 20. Longitudinal data were analyzed using the random effects model. No differences in ventilatory or gas exchange parameters were identified. Among subjects who developed pneumonia there was a significantly higher respiratory score (nursing acuity scale) for subjects on the oscillating bed. Conclusions: In selected critically ill patients oscillating therapy may improve survival and improve airway clearance. The frequency and degree of turning needed to prevent complications and improve outcome remains unclear. These newer beds should be used with discrimination so as to not increase hospital costs unnecessarily.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-103
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous oscillation: Outcome in critically III patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this