Contrasting American and Brazilian systems for water allocation and transfers

Dulce B B Rodrigues, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, Aleix Serrat-Capdevila, Paulo T S Oliveira, E. Mario Mendiondo, Thomas Maddock, Mohammed Mahmoud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United States and Brazil both deal with water-related problems associated with being large territorial areas having uneven distribution of water resources and population. Water transfer projects have been widely considered to be feasible solutions to the mitigation of local water shortages. This paper contrasts American and Brazilian water allocation systems and water transfer projects, located in the Colorado and Piracicaba River basins, seeking potential exchanges between these two water management systems and analyzing their adaptability to trends in water demand and climate. This evaluation indicates that the American system could potentially benefit from some of the principles present in Brazilian framework, including (1) participatory approach involving government, users, and citizens; (2) recognition of the economic value of water; and (3) prioritization of drinking water supply during shortage times. In turn, the Brazilian system could benefit from certain characteristics of American water management, including reduced bureaucracy and a more efficient decision and operation process. Interestingly, both countries have found it useful to employ soft-path solutions to ensure system adaptability to future water demand and supply.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04014087
JournalJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume141
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

water
Water
water demand
water management
Water management
participatory approach
bureaucracy
prioritization
shortage
allocation
mitigation
river basin
water supply
Water resources
water resource
Water supply
Potable water
Catchments
demand
economic value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Contrasting American and Brazilian systems for water allocation and transfers. / Rodrigues, Dulce B B; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai; Serrat-Capdevila, Aleix; Oliveira, Paulo T S; Mario Mendiondo, E.; Maddock, Thomas; Mahmoud, Mohammed.

In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 141, No. 7, 04014087, 01.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a4d3f55aae194321b6222785c3078258,
title = "Contrasting American and Brazilian systems for water allocation and transfers",
abstract = "The United States and Brazil both deal with water-related problems associated with being large territorial areas having uneven distribution of water resources and population. Water transfer projects have been widely considered to be feasible solutions to the mitigation of local water shortages. This paper contrasts American and Brazilian water allocation systems and water transfer projects, located in the Colorado and Piracicaba River basins, seeking potential exchanges between these two water management systems and analyzing their adaptability to trends in water demand and climate. This evaluation indicates that the American system could potentially benefit from some of the principles present in Brazilian framework, including (1) participatory approach involving government, users, and citizens; (2) recognition of the economic value of water; and (3) prioritization of drinking water supply during shortage times. In turn, the Brazilian system could benefit from certain characteristics of American water management, including reduced bureaucracy and a more efficient decision and operation process. Interestingly, both countries have found it useful to employ soft-path solutions to ensure system adaptability to future water demand and supply.",
author = "Rodrigues, {Dulce B B} and Gupta, {Hoshin Vijai} and Aleix Serrat-Capdevila and Oliveira, {Paulo T S} and {Mario Mendiondo}, E. and Thomas Maddock and Mohammed Mahmoud",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000483",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
journal = "Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9496",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting American and Brazilian systems for water allocation and transfers

AU - Rodrigues, Dulce B B

AU - Gupta, Hoshin Vijai

AU - Serrat-Capdevila, Aleix

AU - Oliveira, Paulo T S

AU - Mario Mendiondo, E.

AU - Maddock, Thomas

AU - Mahmoud, Mohammed

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - The United States and Brazil both deal with water-related problems associated with being large territorial areas having uneven distribution of water resources and population. Water transfer projects have been widely considered to be feasible solutions to the mitigation of local water shortages. This paper contrasts American and Brazilian water allocation systems and water transfer projects, located in the Colorado and Piracicaba River basins, seeking potential exchanges between these two water management systems and analyzing their adaptability to trends in water demand and climate. This evaluation indicates that the American system could potentially benefit from some of the principles present in Brazilian framework, including (1) participatory approach involving government, users, and citizens; (2) recognition of the economic value of water; and (3) prioritization of drinking water supply during shortage times. In turn, the Brazilian system could benefit from certain characteristics of American water management, including reduced bureaucracy and a more efficient decision and operation process. Interestingly, both countries have found it useful to employ soft-path solutions to ensure system adaptability to future water demand and supply.

AB - The United States and Brazil both deal with water-related problems associated with being large territorial areas having uneven distribution of water resources and population. Water transfer projects have been widely considered to be feasible solutions to the mitigation of local water shortages. This paper contrasts American and Brazilian water allocation systems and water transfer projects, located in the Colorado and Piracicaba River basins, seeking potential exchanges between these two water management systems and analyzing their adaptability to trends in water demand and climate. This evaluation indicates that the American system could potentially benefit from some of the principles present in Brazilian framework, including (1) participatory approach involving government, users, and citizens; (2) recognition of the economic value of water; and (3) prioritization of drinking water supply during shortage times. In turn, the Brazilian system could benefit from certain characteristics of American water management, including reduced bureaucracy and a more efficient decision and operation process. Interestingly, both countries have found it useful to employ soft-path solutions to ensure system adaptability to future water demand and supply.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988259226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988259226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000483

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000483

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988259226

VL - 141

JO - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9496

IS - 7

M1 - 04014087

ER -