Controversial aspects of respiratory disability determination

Philip I Harber, L. S. Rothenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Respiratory disability determination is a problem of large magnitude. Up to two million workers have disability from occuptional disease, 13% of whom have occupational lung disease. Average benefits for individuals in one state are $200,000. Improper evaluative procedures and decisions can deprive an injured worker of just benefits or may prevent a person from being a productive, satisfied member of the work force. Disability evaluation has been described as a 'fledgling science', but improved understanding of the factors involved and increasing recognition of its importance within the medical community will undoubtedly lead to its future development. We hope that this brief review of selected controversial aspects will be of some use in providing insight into these difficult problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-269
Number of pages13
JournalSeminars in Respiratory Medicine
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disability Evaluation
Occupational Diseases
Lung Diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Controversial aspects of respiratory disability determination. / Harber, Philip I; Rothenberg, L. S.

In: Seminars in Respiratory Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1986, p. 257-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10ebaeec26084cb7a3f0e360aa00a8cf,
title = "Controversial aspects of respiratory disability determination",
abstract = "Respiratory disability determination is a problem of large magnitude. Up to two million workers have disability from occuptional disease, 13{\%} of whom have occupational lung disease. Average benefits for individuals in one state are $200,000. Improper evaluative procedures and decisions can deprive an injured worker of just benefits or may prevent a person from being a productive, satisfied member of the work force. Disability evaluation has been described as a 'fledgling science', but improved understanding of the factors involved and increasing recognition of its importance within the medical community will undoubtedly lead to its future development. We hope that this brief review of selected controversial aspects will be of some use in providing insight into these difficult problems.",
author = "Harber, {Philip I} and Rothenberg, {L. S.}",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "257--269",
journal = "Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1069-3424",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversial aspects of respiratory disability determination

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Rothenberg, L. S.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Respiratory disability determination is a problem of large magnitude. Up to two million workers have disability from occuptional disease, 13% of whom have occupational lung disease. Average benefits for individuals in one state are $200,000. Improper evaluative procedures and decisions can deprive an injured worker of just benefits or may prevent a person from being a productive, satisfied member of the work force. Disability evaluation has been described as a 'fledgling science', but improved understanding of the factors involved and increasing recognition of its importance within the medical community will undoubtedly lead to its future development. We hope that this brief review of selected controversial aspects will be of some use in providing insight into these difficult problems.

AB - Respiratory disability determination is a problem of large magnitude. Up to two million workers have disability from occuptional disease, 13% of whom have occupational lung disease. Average benefits for individuals in one state are $200,000. Improper evaluative procedures and decisions can deprive an injured worker of just benefits or may prevent a person from being a productive, satisfied member of the work force. Disability evaluation has been described as a 'fledgling science', but improved understanding of the factors involved and increasing recognition of its importance within the medical community will undoubtedly lead to its future development. We hope that this brief review of selected controversial aspects will be of some use in providing insight into these difficult problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022629268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022629268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022629268

VL - 7

SP - 257

EP - 269

JO - Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1069-3424

IS - 3

ER -