Conventional vs computed radiography: Evaluation of myelography

P. J. Yang, G. W. Seeley, R. F. Carmody, J. F. Seeger, M. T. Yoshino, B. Mockbee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of conventional film-screen (FS) imaging with computed radiography (CR) in myelography. Forty examinations were done with both methods. Digital myelography was found to have diagnostic accuracy equal to that of conventional film-screen examinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-168
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume9
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional vs computed radiography: Evaluation of myelography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Yang, P. J., Seeley, G. W., Carmody, R. F., Seeger, J. F., Yoshino, M. T., & Mockbee, B. (1988). Conventional vs computed radiography: Evaluation of myelography. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 9(1), 165-168.