Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams

Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes

Matthew J. Pearsall, Aleksander P J Ellis, Jordan H. Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to utilize the challenge-hindrance framework to examine the discrete and combined effects of different environmental stressors on behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes at the team level. Results from 83 teams working on a command and control simulation indicated that the introduction of a challenge stressor positively affected team performance and transactive memory. The introduction of a hindrance stressor negatively affected team performance and transactive memory and positively affected psychological withdrawal. When the hindrance stressor was combined with the challenge stressor, teams exhibited the lowest levels of performance and transactive memory, and the highest levels of psychological withdrawal. These effects were due to the adoption of specific coping strategies by team members. Implications are discussed, as well as limitations and directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-28
Number of pages11
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume109
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Psychology
Stressors
Transactive memory
Psychological
Team performance
Direction compound
Simulation
Coping strategies
Team working

Keywords

  • Coping
  • Stress
  • Teams
  • Transactive memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams : Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. / Pearsall, Matthew J.; Ellis, Aleksander P J; Stein, Jordan H.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 109, No. 1, 05.2009, p. 18-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{675958518ecd4d5488a90ca6d568320f,
title = "Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to utilize the challenge-hindrance framework to examine the discrete and combined effects of different environmental stressors on behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes at the team level. Results from 83 teams working on a command and control simulation indicated that the introduction of a challenge stressor positively affected team performance and transactive memory. The introduction of a hindrance stressor negatively affected team performance and transactive memory and positively affected psychological withdrawal. When the hindrance stressor was combined with the challenge stressor, teams exhibited the lowest levels of performance and transactive memory, and the highest levels of psychological withdrawal. These effects were due to the adoption of specific coping strategies by team members. Implications are discussed, as well as limitations and directions for future research.",
keywords = "Coping, Stress, Teams, Transactive memory",
author = "Pearsall, {Matthew J.} and Ellis, {Aleksander P J} and Stein, {Jordan H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "18--28",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams

T2 - Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes

AU - Pearsall, Matthew J.

AU - Ellis, Aleksander P J

AU - Stein, Jordan H.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - The purpose of this study was to utilize the challenge-hindrance framework to examine the discrete and combined effects of different environmental stressors on behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes at the team level. Results from 83 teams working on a command and control simulation indicated that the introduction of a challenge stressor positively affected team performance and transactive memory. The introduction of a hindrance stressor negatively affected team performance and transactive memory and positively affected psychological withdrawal. When the hindrance stressor was combined with the challenge stressor, teams exhibited the lowest levels of performance and transactive memory, and the highest levels of psychological withdrawal. These effects were due to the adoption of specific coping strategies by team members. Implications are discussed, as well as limitations and directions for future research.

AB - The purpose of this study was to utilize the challenge-hindrance framework to examine the discrete and combined effects of different environmental stressors on behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes at the team level. Results from 83 teams working on a command and control simulation indicated that the introduction of a challenge stressor positively affected team performance and transactive memory. The introduction of a hindrance stressor negatively affected team performance and transactive memory and positively affected psychological withdrawal. When the hindrance stressor was combined with the challenge stressor, teams exhibited the lowest levels of performance and transactive memory, and the highest levels of psychological withdrawal. These effects were due to the adoption of specific coping strategies by team members. Implications are discussed, as well as limitations and directions for future research.

KW - Coping

KW - Stress

KW - Teams

KW - Transactive memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64249147797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64249147797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 18

EP - 28

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -