Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management

Expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty

Tracy A. Glauser, Raman Sankar, Jacquelyn Bainbridge, Martina Bebin, Selim R. Benbadis, Deborah T C Cantrell, R. Edward Faught, Michael Gruenthal, Laura L. Hershkowitz, Gregory L. Holmes, Aatif M. Husain, David M Labiner, Georgia Montouris, Dean K. Naritoku, Barbara J. Olson, John M. Pellock, Patricia E. Penovich, Michael D. Privitera, R. Eugene Ramsay, Jong M. Rho & 8 others Karen C. Richards, William E. Rosenfeld, Jeremy D. Slater, Michael C. Smith, Mark C. Spitz, John M. Stern, David Vossler, James W. Wheless

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although epilepsy is relatively common, only a limited number of specialized epilepsy centers exist in the United States. Therefore, epilepsy diagnosis and management frequently occur in the community setting. This can complicate patient management and suboptimal care is a potential concern. Delayed recognition and inadequate treatment increase the risk of subsequent seizures, brain damage, disability, and death from seizure-related injuries. To identify core elements of epilepsy management that should be offered to all patients, the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty assessed current practical issues and identified practices to improve patient care and outcomes. Scope: This paper presents a consensus opinion formed from a survey of 26 current LEAD faculty members, who answered 105 questions about epilepsy diagnosis and patient evaluation, treatment decisions, lifelong monitoring, and the management of special patient subgroups. Consensus agreement was concluded when ≥50% of the faculty provided the same answer. The results were compiled and areas of consensus are included in this report. The recommendations provided in this commentary are limited by the scope of the survey. Findings: Consensus was reached on several minimum standard patient management practices. Primary among these minimum standards of care is the need for diagnosis including a detailed medical history, neurological examination, discussions with caregivers, and diagnostic tests including electroencephalograms and magnetic resonance imaging. As the overall goals of therapy include seizure freedom, minimizing side effects, and improving quality of life and long-term safety, therapy decisions should consider parameters that affect these goals, including potential adverse effects of therapy. Antiepileptic drug selection should consider coexisting conditions for possible exacerbation of disease and potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: The core elements of epilepsy management identified here suggest minimum standards that can be used across all settings to improve consistency and quality of epilepsy diagnosis and care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3463-3477
Number of pages15
JournalCurrent Medical Research and Opinion
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Consensus
Seizures
Patient Care Management
Therapeutics
Practice Management
Neurologic Examination
Standard of Care
Drug Interactions
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Anticonvulsants
Caregivers
Disease Progression
Electroencephalography
Patient Care
Quality of Life
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Safety
Wounds and Injuries
Brain

Keywords

  • Consensus development
  • Disease management
  • Epilepsy
  • Long-term care
  • Practice recommendations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management : Expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty. / Glauser, Tracy A.; Sankar, Raman; Bainbridge, Jacquelyn; Bebin, Martina; Benbadis, Selim R.; Cantrell, Deborah T C; Faught, R. Edward; Gruenthal, Michael; Hershkowitz, Laura L.; Holmes, Gregory L.; Husain, Aatif M.; Labiner, David M; Montouris, Georgia; Naritoku, Dean K.; Olson, Barbara J.; Pellock, John M.; Penovich, Patricia E.; Privitera, Michael D.; Ramsay, R. Eugene; Rho, Jong M.; Richards, Karen C.; Rosenfeld, William E.; Slater, Jeremy D.; Smith, Michael C.; Spitz, Mark C.; Stern, John M.; Vossler, David; Wheless, James W.

In: Current Medical Research and Opinion, Vol. 24, No. 12, 2008, p. 3463-3477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glauser, TA, Sankar, R, Bainbridge, J, Bebin, M, Benbadis, SR, Cantrell, DTC, Faught, RE, Gruenthal, M, Hershkowitz, LL, Holmes, GL, Husain, AM, Labiner, DM, Montouris, G, Naritoku, DK, Olson, BJ, Pellock, JM, Penovich, PE, Privitera, MD, Ramsay, RE, Rho, JM, Richards, KC, Rosenfeld, WE, Slater, JD, Smith, MC, Spitz, MC, Stern, JM, Vossler, D & Wheless, JW 2008, 'Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management: Expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty', Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3463-3477. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990802561148
Glauser, Tracy A. ; Sankar, Raman ; Bainbridge, Jacquelyn ; Bebin, Martina ; Benbadis, Selim R. ; Cantrell, Deborah T C ; Faught, R. Edward ; Gruenthal, Michael ; Hershkowitz, Laura L. ; Holmes, Gregory L. ; Husain, Aatif M. ; Labiner, David M ; Montouris, Georgia ; Naritoku, Dean K. ; Olson, Barbara J. ; Pellock, John M. ; Penovich, Patricia E. ; Privitera, Michael D. ; Ramsay, R. Eugene ; Rho, Jong M. ; Richards, Karen C. ; Rosenfeld, William E. ; Slater, Jeremy D. ; Smith, Michael C. ; Spitz, Mark C. ; Stern, John M. ; Vossler, David ; Wheless, James W. / Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management : Expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty. In: Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 12. pp. 3463-3477.
@article{db780a65b7084677ab0da1d9941908f3,
title = "Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management: Expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty",
abstract = "Background: Although epilepsy is relatively common, only a limited number of specialized epilepsy centers exist in the United States. Therefore, epilepsy diagnosis and management frequently occur in the community setting. This can complicate patient management and suboptimal care is a potential concern. Delayed recognition and inadequate treatment increase the risk of subsequent seizures, brain damage, disability, and death from seizure-related injuries. To identify core elements of epilepsy management that should be offered to all patients, the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty assessed current practical issues and identified practices to improve patient care and outcomes. Scope: This paper presents a consensus opinion formed from a survey of 26 current LEAD faculty members, who answered 105 questions about epilepsy diagnosis and patient evaluation, treatment decisions, lifelong monitoring, and the management of special patient subgroups. Consensus agreement was concluded when ≥50{\%} of the faculty provided the same answer. The results were compiled and areas of consensus are included in this report. The recommendations provided in this commentary are limited by the scope of the survey. Findings: Consensus was reached on several minimum standard patient management practices. Primary among these minimum standards of care is the need for diagnosis including a detailed medical history, neurological examination, discussions with caregivers, and diagnostic tests including electroencephalograms and magnetic resonance imaging. As the overall goals of therapy include seizure freedom, minimizing side effects, and improving quality of life and long-term safety, therapy decisions should consider parameters that affect these goals, including potential adverse effects of therapy. Antiepileptic drug selection should consider coexisting conditions for possible exacerbation of disease and potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: The core elements of epilepsy management identified here suggest minimum standards that can be used across all settings to improve consistency and quality of epilepsy diagnosis and care.",
keywords = "Consensus development, Disease management, Epilepsy, Long-term care, Practice recommendations",
author = "Glauser, {Tracy A.} and Raman Sankar and Jacquelyn Bainbridge and Martina Bebin and Benbadis, {Selim R.} and Cantrell, {Deborah T C} and Faught, {R. Edward} and Michael Gruenthal and Hershkowitz, {Laura L.} and Holmes, {Gregory L.} and Husain, {Aatif M.} and Labiner, {David M} and Georgia Montouris and Naritoku, {Dean K.} and Olson, {Barbara J.} and Pellock, {John M.} and Penovich, {Patricia E.} and Privitera, {Michael D.} and Ramsay, {R. Eugene} and Rho, {Jong M.} and Richards, {Karen C.} and Rosenfeld, {William E.} and Slater, {Jeremy D.} and Smith, {Michael C.} and Spitz, {Mark C.} and Stern, {John M.} and David Vossler and Wheless, {James W.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1185/03007990802561148",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "3463--3477",
journal = "Current Medical Research and Opinion",
issn = "0300-7995",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management

T2 - Expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty

AU - Glauser, Tracy A.

AU - Sankar, Raman

AU - Bainbridge, Jacquelyn

AU - Bebin, Martina

AU - Benbadis, Selim R.

AU - Cantrell, Deborah T C

AU - Faught, R. Edward

AU - Gruenthal, Michael

AU - Hershkowitz, Laura L.

AU - Holmes, Gregory L.

AU - Husain, Aatif M.

AU - Labiner, David M

AU - Montouris, Georgia

AU - Naritoku, Dean K.

AU - Olson, Barbara J.

AU - Pellock, John M.

AU - Penovich, Patricia E.

AU - Privitera, Michael D.

AU - Ramsay, R. Eugene

AU - Rho, Jong M.

AU - Richards, Karen C.

AU - Rosenfeld, William E.

AU - Slater, Jeremy D.

AU - Smith, Michael C.

AU - Spitz, Mark C.

AU - Stern, John M.

AU - Vossler, David

AU - Wheless, James W.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Background: Although epilepsy is relatively common, only a limited number of specialized epilepsy centers exist in the United States. Therefore, epilepsy diagnosis and management frequently occur in the community setting. This can complicate patient management and suboptimal care is a potential concern. Delayed recognition and inadequate treatment increase the risk of subsequent seizures, brain damage, disability, and death from seizure-related injuries. To identify core elements of epilepsy management that should be offered to all patients, the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty assessed current practical issues and identified practices to improve patient care and outcomes. Scope: This paper presents a consensus opinion formed from a survey of 26 current LEAD faculty members, who answered 105 questions about epilepsy diagnosis and patient evaluation, treatment decisions, lifelong monitoring, and the management of special patient subgroups. Consensus agreement was concluded when ≥50% of the faculty provided the same answer. The results were compiled and areas of consensus are included in this report. The recommendations provided in this commentary are limited by the scope of the survey. Findings: Consensus was reached on several minimum standard patient management practices. Primary among these minimum standards of care is the need for diagnosis including a detailed medical history, neurological examination, discussions with caregivers, and diagnostic tests including electroencephalograms and magnetic resonance imaging. As the overall goals of therapy include seizure freedom, minimizing side effects, and improving quality of life and long-term safety, therapy decisions should consider parameters that affect these goals, including potential adverse effects of therapy. Antiepileptic drug selection should consider coexisting conditions for possible exacerbation of disease and potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: The core elements of epilepsy management identified here suggest minimum standards that can be used across all settings to improve consistency and quality of epilepsy diagnosis and care.

AB - Background: Although epilepsy is relatively common, only a limited number of specialized epilepsy centers exist in the United States. Therefore, epilepsy diagnosis and management frequently occur in the community setting. This can complicate patient management and suboptimal care is a potential concern. Delayed recognition and inadequate treatment increase the risk of subsequent seizures, brain damage, disability, and death from seizure-related injuries. To identify core elements of epilepsy management that should be offered to all patients, the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty assessed current practical issues and identified practices to improve patient care and outcomes. Scope: This paper presents a consensus opinion formed from a survey of 26 current LEAD faculty members, who answered 105 questions about epilepsy diagnosis and patient evaluation, treatment decisions, lifelong monitoring, and the management of special patient subgroups. Consensus agreement was concluded when ≥50% of the faculty provided the same answer. The results were compiled and areas of consensus are included in this report. The recommendations provided in this commentary are limited by the scope of the survey. Findings: Consensus was reached on several minimum standard patient management practices. Primary among these minimum standards of care is the need for diagnosis including a detailed medical history, neurological examination, discussions with caregivers, and diagnostic tests including electroencephalograms and magnetic resonance imaging. As the overall goals of therapy include seizure freedom, minimizing side effects, and improving quality of life and long-term safety, therapy decisions should consider parameters that affect these goals, including potential adverse effects of therapy. Antiepileptic drug selection should consider coexisting conditions for possible exacerbation of disease and potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: The core elements of epilepsy management identified here suggest minimum standards that can be used across all settings to improve consistency and quality of epilepsy diagnosis and care.

KW - Consensus development

KW - Disease management

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Long-term care

KW - Practice recommendations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62349131524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62349131524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1185/03007990802561148

DO - 10.1185/03007990802561148

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 3463

EP - 3477

JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion

JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion

SN - 0300-7995

IS - 12

ER -