Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants

Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?

Angela T. Moles, Begoña Peco, Ian R. Wallis, William J. Foley, Alistair G B Poore, Eric W. Seabloom, Peter A. Vesk, Alejandro J. Bisigato, Lucrecia Cella-Pizarro, Connie J. Clark, Philippe S. Cohen, William K. Cornwell, Will Edwards, Rasmus Ejrnæs, Therany Gonzales-Ojeda, Bente J. Graae, Gregory Hay, Fainess C. Lumbwe, Benjamín Magaña-Rodríguez, Ben D. Moore & 27 others Pablo L. Peri, John R. Poulsen, James C. Stegen, Ruan Veldtman, Hugo von Zeipel, Nigel R. Andrew, Sarah L. Boulter, Elizabeth T. Borer, Johannes H C Cornelissen, Alejandro G. Farji-Brener, Jane L. Degabriel, Enrique Jurado, Line A. Kyhn, Bill Low, Christa P H Mulder, Kathryn Reardon-Smith, Jorge Rodríguez-Velázquez, An De Fortier, Zheng Zheng, Pedro G. Blendinger, Brian Enquist, Jose M. Facelli, Tiffany Knight, Jonathan D. Majer, Miguel Martínez-Ramos, Peter Mcquillan, Francis K C Hui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species' overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)252-263
Number of pages12
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume198
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

skin (animal)
Cats
cats
Skin
cluster analysis
principal component analysis
herbivores
Herbivory
phylogeny
Phylogeny
Principal Component Analysis
Cluster Analysis
chemical defenses
Growth

Keywords

  • Cyanogenesis
  • Extrafloral nectaries
  • Hair
  • Leaf toughness
  • Lipid
  • Plant-herbivore interactions
  • Spines
  • Tannin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science
  • Physiology

Cite this

Moles, A. T., Peco, B., Wallis, I. R., Foley, W. J., Poore, A. G. B., Seabloom, E. W., ... Hui, F. K. C. (2013). Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat? New Phytologist, 198(1), 252-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12116

Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants : Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat? / Moles, Angela T.; Peco, Begoña; Wallis, Ian R.; Foley, William J.; Poore, Alistair G B; Seabloom, Eric W.; Vesk, Peter A.; Bisigato, Alejandro J.; Cella-Pizarro, Lucrecia; Clark, Connie J.; Cohen, Philippe S.; Cornwell, William K.; Edwards, Will; Ejrnæs, Rasmus; Gonzales-Ojeda, Therany; Graae, Bente J.; Hay, Gregory; Lumbwe, Fainess C.; Magaña-Rodríguez, Benjamín; Moore, Ben D.; Peri, Pablo L.; Poulsen, John R.; Stegen, James C.; Veldtman, Ruan; von Zeipel, Hugo; Andrew, Nigel R.; Boulter, Sarah L.; Borer, Elizabeth T.; Cornelissen, Johannes H C; Farji-Brener, Alejandro G.; Degabriel, Jane L.; Jurado, Enrique; Kyhn, Line A.; Low, Bill; Mulder, Christa P H; Reardon-Smith, Kathryn; Rodríguez-Velázquez, Jorge; De Fortier, An; Zheng, Zheng; Blendinger, Pedro G.; Enquist, Brian; Facelli, Jose M.; Knight, Tiffany; Majer, Jonathan D.; Martínez-Ramos, Miguel; Mcquillan, Peter; Hui, Francis K C.

In: New Phytologist, Vol. 198, No. 1, 04.2013, p. 252-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moles, AT, Peco, B, Wallis, IR, Foley, WJ, Poore, AGB, Seabloom, EW, Vesk, PA, Bisigato, AJ, Cella-Pizarro, L, Clark, CJ, Cohen, PS, Cornwell, WK, Edwards, W, Ejrnæs, R, Gonzales-Ojeda, T, Graae, BJ, Hay, G, Lumbwe, FC, Magaña-Rodríguez, B, Moore, BD, Peri, PL, Poulsen, JR, Stegen, JC, Veldtman, R, von Zeipel, H, Andrew, NR, Boulter, SL, Borer, ET, Cornelissen, JHC, Farji-Brener, AG, Degabriel, JL, Jurado, E, Kyhn, LA, Low, B, Mulder, CPH, Reardon-Smith, K, Rodríguez-Velázquez, J, De Fortier, A, Zheng, Z, Blendinger, PG, Enquist, B, Facelli, JM, Knight, T, Majer, JD, Martínez-Ramos, M, Mcquillan, P & Hui, FKC 2013, 'Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?', New Phytologist, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 252-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12116
Moles, Angela T. ; Peco, Begoña ; Wallis, Ian R. ; Foley, William J. ; Poore, Alistair G B ; Seabloom, Eric W. ; Vesk, Peter A. ; Bisigato, Alejandro J. ; Cella-Pizarro, Lucrecia ; Clark, Connie J. ; Cohen, Philippe S. ; Cornwell, William K. ; Edwards, Will ; Ejrnæs, Rasmus ; Gonzales-Ojeda, Therany ; Graae, Bente J. ; Hay, Gregory ; Lumbwe, Fainess C. ; Magaña-Rodríguez, Benjamín ; Moore, Ben D. ; Peri, Pablo L. ; Poulsen, John R. ; Stegen, James C. ; Veldtman, Ruan ; von Zeipel, Hugo ; Andrew, Nigel R. ; Boulter, Sarah L. ; Borer, Elizabeth T. ; Cornelissen, Johannes H C ; Farji-Brener, Alejandro G. ; Degabriel, Jane L. ; Jurado, Enrique ; Kyhn, Line A. ; Low, Bill ; Mulder, Christa P H ; Reardon-Smith, Kathryn ; Rodríguez-Velázquez, Jorge ; De Fortier, An ; Zheng, Zheng ; Blendinger, Pedro G. ; Enquist, Brian ; Facelli, Jose M. ; Knight, Tiffany ; Majer, Jonathan D. ; Martínez-Ramos, Miguel ; Mcquillan, Peter ; Hui, Francis K C. / Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants : Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?. In: New Phytologist. 2013 ; Vol. 198, No. 1. pp. 252-263.
@article{8426fdeb1d87400ea3eaed1224bf9a00,
title = "Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?",
abstract = "Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species' overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.",
keywords = "Cyanogenesis, Extrafloral nectaries, Hair, Leaf toughness, Lipid, Plant-herbivore interactions, Spines, Tannin",
author = "Moles, {Angela T.} and Bego{\~n}a Peco and Wallis, {Ian R.} and Foley, {William J.} and Poore, {Alistair G B} and Seabloom, {Eric W.} and Vesk, {Peter A.} and Bisigato, {Alejandro J.} and Lucrecia Cella-Pizarro and Clark, {Connie J.} and Cohen, {Philippe S.} and Cornwell, {William K.} and Will Edwards and Rasmus Ejrn{\ae}s and Therany Gonzales-Ojeda and Graae, {Bente J.} and Gregory Hay and Lumbwe, {Fainess C.} and Benjam{\'i}n Maga{\~n}a-Rodr{\'i}guez and Moore, {Ben D.} and Peri, {Pablo L.} and Poulsen, {John R.} and Stegen, {James C.} and Ruan Veldtman and {von Zeipel}, Hugo and Andrew, {Nigel R.} and Boulter, {Sarah L.} and Borer, {Elizabeth T.} and Cornelissen, {Johannes H C} and Farji-Brener, {Alejandro G.} and Degabriel, {Jane L.} and Enrique Jurado and Kyhn, {Line A.} and Bill Low and Mulder, {Christa P H} and Kathryn Reardon-Smith and Jorge Rodr{\'i}guez-Vel{\'a}zquez and {De Fortier}, An and Zheng Zheng and Blendinger, {Pedro G.} and Brian Enquist and Facelli, {Jose M.} and Tiffany Knight and Majer, {Jonathan D.} and Miguel Mart{\'i}nez-Ramos and Peter Mcquillan and Hui, {Francis K C}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/nph.12116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "198",
pages = "252--263",
journal = "New Phytologist",
issn = "0028-646X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants

T2 - Tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?

AU - Moles, Angela T.

AU - Peco, Begoña

AU - Wallis, Ian R.

AU - Foley, William J.

AU - Poore, Alistair G B

AU - Seabloom, Eric W.

AU - Vesk, Peter A.

AU - Bisigato, Alejandro J.

AU - Cella-Pizarro, Lucrecia

AU - Clark, Connie J.

AU - Cohen, Philippe S.

AU - Cornwell, William K.

AU - Edwards, Will

AU - Ejrnæs, Rasmus

AU - Gonzales-Ojeda, Therany

AU - Graae, Bente J.

AU - Hay, Gregory

AU - Lumbwe, Fainess C.

AU - Magaña-Rodríguez, Benjamín

AU - Moore, Ben D.

AU - Peri, Pablo L.

AU - Poulsen, John R.

AU - Stegen, James C.

AU - Veldtman, Ruan

AU - von Zeipel, Hugo

AU - Andrew, Nigel R.

AU - Boulter, Sarah L.

AU - Borer, Elizabeth T.

AU - Cornelissen, Johannes H C

AU - Farji-Brener, Alejandro G.

AU - Degabriel, Jane L.

AU - Jurado, Enrique

AU - Kyhn, Line A.

AU - Low, Bill

AU - Mulder, Christa P H

AU - Reardon-Smith, Kathryn

AU - Rodríguez-Velázquez, Jorge

AU - De Fortier, An

AU - Zheng, Zheng

AU - Blendinger, Pedro G.

AU - Enquist, Brian

AU - Facelli, Jose M.

AU - Knight, Tiffany

AU - Majer, Jonathan D.

AU - Martínez-Ramos, Miguel

AU - Mcquillan, Peter

AU - Hui, Francis K C

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species' overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.

AB - Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species' overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.

KW - Cyanogenesis

KW - Extrafloral nectaries

KW - Hair

KW - Leaf toughness

KW - Lipid

KW - Plant-herbivore interactions

KW - Spines

KW - Tannin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874195500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874195500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/nph.12116

DO - 10.1111/nph.12116

M3 - Article

VL - 198

SP - 252

EP - 263

JO - New Phytologist

JF - New Phytologist

SN - 0028-646X

IS - 1

ER -