Cosmological tests using the angular size of galaxy clusters

Jun Jie Wei, Xue Feng Wu, Fulvio Melia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use measurements of the galaxy-cluster angular size versus redshift to test and compare the standard model (ΔCDM) and the Rh = ct Universe. We show that the latter fits the data with a reduced χ2 dof = 0.786 for a Hubble constant H0 = 72.6+3.8 -3.4 km s-1 Mpc-1, and H0 is the sole parameter in this model. By comparison, the optimal flat cold dark matter (ΔCDM) model, with two free parameters (including ωm = 0.50 and H0 = 73.9+10.6 -9.5 km s-1Mpc-1), fits the angular-size data with a reduced x2 dof = 0.806. On the basis of their x2 dof values alone, both models appear to account for the data very well in spite of the fact that the Rh = ct Universe expands at a constant rate, while ΔCDM does not. However, because of the different number of free parameters in these models, selection tools, such as the Bayes Information Criterion, favour Rh = ct over CDM with a likelihood of ~86 per cent versus ~14 per cent. These results impact the question of galaxy growth at large redshifts. Previous work suggested an inconsistency with the underlying cosmological model unless elliptical and disc galaxies grew in size by a surprisingly large factor ~6 from z ~ 3 to 0. The fact that both CDM and Rh = ct fit the cluster-size measurements quite well casts some doubt on the suggestion that the unexpected result with individual galaxies may be due to the use of an incorrect expansion scenario, rather than astrophysical causes, such as mergers and/or selection effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-485
Number of pages7
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume447
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 20 2014

Fingerprint

galaxies
universe
Hubble constant
disk galaxies
elliptical galaxies
suggestion
casts
dark matter
astrophysics
test
expansion
causes
merger
parameter

Keywords

  • Cosmological parameters
  • Cosmology: theory
  • Distance scale
  • Galaxies: clusters: general
  • Galaxies: evolution
  • Large-scale structure of universe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

Cosmological tests using the angular size of galaxy clusters. / Wei, Jun Jie; Wu, Xue Feng; Melia, Fulvio.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 447, No. 1, 20.11.2014, p. 479-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dcfe67432c3746d68a9733df51b79888,
title = "Cosmological tests using the angular size of galaxy clusters",
abstract = "We use measurements of the galaxy-cluster angular size versus redshift to test and compare the standard model (ΔCDM) and the Rh = ct Universe. We show that the latter fits the data with a reduced χ2 dof = 0.786 for a Hubble constant H0 = 72.6+3.8 -3.4 km s-1 Mpc-1, and H0 is the sole parameter in this model. By comparison, the optimal flat cold dark matter (ΔCDM) model, with two free parameters (including ωm = 0.50 and H0 = 73.9+10.6 -9.5 km s-1Mpc-1), fits the angular-size data with a reduced x2 dof = 0.806. On the basis of their x2 dof values alone, both models appear to account for the data very well in spite of the fact that the Rh = ct Universe expands at a constant rate, while ΔCDM does not. However, because of the different number of free parameters in these models, selection tools, such as the Bayes Information Criterion, favour Rh = ct over CDM with a likelihood of ~86 per cent versus ~14 per cent. These results impact the question of galaxy growth at large redshifts. Previous work suggested an inconsistency with the underlying cosmological model unless elliptical and disc galaxies grew in size by a surprisingly large factor ~6 from z ~ 3 to 0. The fact that both CDM and Rh = ct fit the cluster-size measurements quite well casts some doubt on the suggestion that the unexpected result with individual galaxies may be due to the use of an incorrect expansion scenario, rather than astrophysical causes, such as mergers and/or selection effects.",
keywords = "Cosmological parameters, Cosmology: theory, Distance scale, Galaxies: clusters: general, Galaxies: evolution, Large-scale structure of universe",
author = "Wei, {Jun Jie} and Wu, {Xue Feng} and Fulvio Melia",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1093/mnras/stu2470",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "447",
pages = "479--485",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cosmological tests using the angular size of galaxy clusters

AU - Wei, Jun Jie

AU - Wu, Xue Feng

AU - Melia, Fulvio

PY - 2014/11/20

Y1 - 2014/11/20

N2 - We use measurements of the galaxy-cluster angular size versus redshift to test and compare the standard model (ΔCDM) and the Rh = ct Universe. We show that the latter fits the data with a reduced χ2 dof = 0.786 for a Hubble constant H0 = 72.6+3.8 -3.4 km s-1 Mpc-1, and H0 is the sole parameter in this model. By comparison, the optimal flat cold dark matter (ΔCDM) model, with two free parameters (including ωm = 0.50 and H0 = 73.9+10.6 -9.5 km s-1Mpc-1), fits the angular-size data with a reduced x2 dof = 0.806. On the basis of their x2 dof values alone, both models appear to account for the data very well in spite of the fact that the Rh = ct Universe expands at a constant rate, while ΔCDM does not. However, because of the different number of free parameters in these models, selection tools, such as the Bayes Information Criterion, favour Rh = ct over CDM with a likelihood of ~86 per cent versus ~14 per cent. These results impact the question of galaxy growth at large redshifts. Previous work suggested an inconsistency with the underlying cosmological model unless elliptical and disc galaxies grew in size by a surprisingly large factor ~6 from z ~ 3 to 0. The fact that both CDM and Rh = ct fit the cluster-size measurements quite well casts some doubt on the suggestion that the unexpected result with individual galaxies may be due to the use of an incorrect expansion scenario, rather than astrophysical causes, such as mergers and/or selection effects.

AB - We use measurements of the galaxy-cluster angular size versus redshift to test and compare the standard model (ΔCDM) and the Rh = ct Universe. We show that the latter fits the data with a reduced χ2 dof = 0.786 for a Hubble constant H0 = 72.6+3.8 -3.4 km s-1 Mpc-1, and H0 is the sole parameter in this model. By comparison, the optimal flat cold dark matter (ΔCDM) model, with two free parameters (including ωm = 0.50 and H0 = 73.9+10.6 -9.5 km s-1Mpc-1), fits the angular-size data with a reduced x2 dof = 0.806. On the basis of their x2 dof values alone, both models appear to account for the data very well in spite of the fact that the Rh = ct Universe expands at a constant rate, while ΔCDM does not. However, because of the different number of free parameters in these models, selection tools, such as the Bayes Information Criterion, favour Rh = ct over CDM with a likelihood of ~86 per cent versus ~14 per cent. These results impact the question of galaxy growth at large redshifts. Previous work suggested an inconsistency with the underlying cosmological model unless elliptical and disc galaxies grew in size by a surprisingly large factor ~6 from z ~ 3 to 0. The fact that both CDM and Rh = ct fit the cluster-size measurements quite well casts some doubt on the suggestion that the unexpected result with individual galaxies may be due to the use of an incorrect expansion scenario, rather than astrophysical causes, such as mergers and/or selection effects.

KW - Cosmological parameters

KW - Cosmology: theory

KW - Distance scale

KW - Galaxies: clusters: general

KW - Galaxies: evolution

KW - Large-scale structure of universe

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922445138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922445138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stu2470

DO - 10.1093/mnras/stu2470

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922445138

VL - 447

SP - 479

EP - 485

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 1

ER -