Cost analysis of once-daily ISMN versus twice-daily ISMN or transdermal patch for nitrate prophylaxis

R. E. Brown, M. J. Kendall, M. T. Halpern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the costs and outcomes of treating exercise-induced angina with once- or twice-daily isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) or transdermal patch. Method: A decision-analytic model was designed based on published literature showing compliance and increasing symptoms and estimates from physicians on treatment patterns and worsening symptoms. Results: Data show that patients are more compliant with once-daily ISMN (Imdur®, Astra Hassle, Molndal, Sweden) and patch regimens than with twice-daily dose. Based upon the assumption that more compliant patients are better controlled, the model found that fewer medical care resources were consumed by patients treated with the once-daily and the patch regimens. The unit cost of the twice-daily ISMN regimen is 40% of the unit cost of the once-daily. Annual costs of treating an exercise-induced angina patient are £248 for Imdur® compared to £250 for the twice-daily ISMN and £299 for the transdermal patch. Conclusion: Unit prices alone are not good indicators for estimating medical management costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-76
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cost analysis of once-daily ISMN versus twice-daily ISMN or transdermal patch for nitrate prophylaxis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this