Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: Still a necessity?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although normalization of brain images is critical to the analysis of structural damage across individuals, loss of tissue due to focal lesions presents challenges to the available normalization algorithms. Until recently, cost function masking, as advocated by Brett and colleagues (2001), was the accepted method to overcome difficulties encountered when normalizing damaged brains; however, development of the unified segmentation approach for normalization in SPM5 (Ashburner & Friston, 2005) offered an alternative. Crinion et al. (2007) demonstrated this approach produced normalization results without cost function masking that appeared to be robust to lesion effects when tested using the same simulated lesions studied by Brett et al. (2001). The present study sought to confirm the validity of this approach in brains with focal damage due to vascular events. To do so, we examined outcomes of normalization using unified segmentation with and without cost function masking in 49 brain images with chronic stroke. Lesion masks were created using two approaches (precise and rough drawings of lesion boundaries), and normalization was implemented with both smoothed and unsmoothed versions of the masks. We found that failure to employ cost function masking produced less accurate results in real and simulated lesions, compared to masked normalization, both in terms of deformation field displacement and voxelwise intensity differences. Additionally, unmasked normalization led to significant underestimation of lesion volume relative to all four masking conditions, especially in patients with large lesions. Taken together, these findings suggest cost function masking is still necessary when normalizing brain images with chronic infarcts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)78-84
Number of pages7
JournalNeuroImage
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
Brain
Masks
Blood Vessels
Stroke

Keywords

  • Cost function masking
  • Normalization
  • Structural MRI
  • Unified segmentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions : Still a necessity? / Andersen, Sarah M.; Rapcsak, Steven Z; Beeson, Pelagie M.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 53, No. 1, 10.2010, p. 78-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1301d08ea466490ba511f5f1470e47c4,
title = "Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: Still a necessity?",
abstract = "Although normalization of brain images is critical to the analysis of structural damage across individuals, loss of tissue due to focal lesions presents challenges to the available normalization algorithms. Until recently, cost function masking, as advocated by Brett and colleagues (2001), was the accepted method to overcome difficulties encountered when normalizing damaged brains; however, development of the unified segmentation approach for normalization in SPM5 (Ashburner & Friston, 2005) offered an alternative. Crinion et al. (2007) demonstrated this approach produced normalization results without cost function masking that appeared to be robust to lesion effects when tested using the same simulated lesions studied by Brett et al. (2001). The present study sought to confirm the validity of this approach in brains with focal damage due to vascular events. To do so, we examined outcomes of normalization using unified segmentation with and without cost function masking in 49 brain images with chronic stroke. Lesion masks were created using two approaches (precise and rough drawings of lesion boundaries), and normalization was implemented with both smoothed and unsmoothed versions of the masks. We found that failure to employ cost function masking produced less accurate results in real and simulated lesions, compared to masked normalization, both in terms of deformation field displacement and voxelwise intensity differences. Additionally, unmasked normalization led to significant underestimation of lesion volume relative to all four masking conditions, especially in patients with large lesions. Taken together, these findings suggest cost function masking is still necessary when normalizing brain images with chronic infarcts.",
keywords = "Cost function masking, Normalization, Structural MRI, Unified segmentation",
author = "Andersen, {Sarah M.} and Rapcsak, {Steven Z} and Beeson, {Pelagie M}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "78--84",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions

T2 - Still a necessity?

AU - Andersen, Sarah M.

AU - Rapcsak, Steven Z

AU - Beeson, Pelagie M

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Although normalization of brain images is critical to the analysis of structural damage across individuals, loss of tissue due to focal lesions presents challenges to the available normalization algorithms. Until recently, cost function masking, as advocated by Brett and colleagues (2001), was the accepted method to overcome difficulties encountered when normalizing damaged brains; however, development of the unified segmentation approach for normalization in SPM5 (Ashburner & Friston, 2005) offered an alternative. Crinion et al. (2007) demonstrated this approach produced normalization results without cost function masking that appeared to be robust to lesion effects when tested using the same simulated lesions studied by Brett et al. (2001). The present study sought to confirm the validity of this approach in brains with focal damage due to vascular events. To do so, we examined outcomes of normalization using unified segmentation with and without cost function masking in 49 brain images with chronic stroke. Lesion masks were created using two approaches (precise and rough drawings of lesion boundaries), and normalization was implemented with both smoothed and unsmoothed versions of the masks. We found that failure to employ cost function masking produced less accurate results in real and simulated lesions, compared to masked normalization, both in terms of deformation field displacement and voxelwise intensity differences. Additionally, unmasked normalization led to significant underestimation of lesion volume relative to all four masking conditions, especially in patients with large lesions. Taken together, these findings suggest cost function masking is still necessary when normalizing brain images with chronic infarcts.

AB - Although normalization of brain images is critical to the analysis of structural damage across individuals, loss of tissue due to focal lesions presents challenges to the available normalization algorithms. Until recently, cost function masking, as advocated by Brett and colleagues (2001), was the accepted method to overcome difficulties encountered when normalizing damaged brains; however, development of the unified segmentation approach for normalization in SPM5 (Ashburner & Friston, 2005) offered an alternative. Crinion et al. (2007) demonstrated this approach produced normalization results without cost function masking that appeared to be robust to lesion effects when tested using the same simulated lesions studied by Brett et al. (2001). The present study sought to confirm the validity of this approach in brains with focal damage due to vascular events. To do so, we examined outcomes of normalization using unified segmentation with and without cost function masking in 49 brain images with chronic stroke. Lesion masks were created using two approaches (precise and rough drawings of lesion boundaries), and normalization was implemented with both smoothed and unsmoothed versions of the masks. We found that failure to employ cost function masking produced less accurate results in real and simulated lesions, compared to masked normalization, both in terms of deformation field displacement and voxelwise intensity differences. Additionally, unmasked normalization led to significant underestimation of lesion volume relative to all four masking conditions, especially in patients with large lesions. Taken together, these findings suggest cost function masking is still necessary when normalizing brain images with chronic infarcts.

KW - Cost function masking

KW - Normalization

KW - Structural MRI

KW - Unified segmentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955303792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955303792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 20542122

AN - SCOPUS:77955303792

VL - 53

SP - 78

EP - 84

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 1

ER -