Craft education in finland: Definitions, rationales, and the future

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The status, content, and social factors influencing craft education in Rnland, a standard subject in comprehensive schools, were examined during interviews with craft teachers, craft teacher preparers, and educational administrators. In this paper, the following areas are examined: How are crafts defined? What rationales and cultural and social factors keep craft education robust and what factors threaten it? What is perceived as the future of craft education?Definitions of crafts in schooling varied among interviewees, with some arguing to maintain traditional divisions between art and craft, and between craft subjects of textiles and technical work, and others noting distinction in these subjects only in the materials and techniques used. Some interviewees associated art teaching with self-expression and craft with skill, materials, and techniques. The context for craft education affected by Rnland's rapid change, after World War II, from a rural agrarian society to an urban and highly technological one, is understood as putting pressure on craft education to remain meaningful. Rationales given by interviewees forteaching craft in schools fell into five categories: craft provides 1) cognitive development in several dimensions, 2) learning about living in the world, 3) Rnnish traditions and culture, 4)social and individual growth, and 5)abreakfrom the demands of academic subjects. All interviewees seemed to agree that teaching crafts in Rnland is changing in terms of how teachers are prepared, who writes curriculum, the content of the curriculum, and the configuration of craft in the comprehensive school curriculum. Some interviewees portended adecline in craft education in public schooling, while others embraced change as part of nation building.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-145
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Art and Design Education
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Finland
education
comprehensive school
curriculum
social factors
teacher
agrarian society
art
cognitive development
Teaching
state formation
cultural factors
World War II
Education
interview
school
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Education

Cite this

Craft education in finland : Definitions, rationales, and the future. / Garber, Elizabeth J.

In: International Journal of Art and Design Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2002, p. 132-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e6f07841cc04619a9f33bd767935030,
title = "Craft education in finland: Definitions, rationales, and the future",
abstract = "The status, content, and social factors influencing craft education in Rnland, a standard subject in comprehensive schools, were examined during interviews with craft teachers, craft teacher preparers, and educational administrators. In this paper, the following areas are examined: How are crafts defined? What rationales and cultural and social factors keep craft education robust and what factors threaten it? What is perceived as the future of craft education?Definitions of crafts in schooling varied among interviewees, with some arguing to maintain traditional divisions between art and craft, and between craft subjects of textiles and technical work, and others noting distinction in these subjects only in the materials and techniques used. Some interviewees associated art teaching with self-expression and craft with skill, materials, and techniques. The context for craft education affected by Rnland's rapid change, after World War II, from a rural agrarian society to an urban and highly technological one, is understood as putting pressure on craft education to remain meaningful. Rationales given by interviewees forteaching craft in schools fell into five categories: craft provides 1) cognitive development in several dimensions, 2) learning about living in the world, 3) Rnnish traditions and culture, 4)social and individual growth, and 5)abreakfrom the demands of academic subjects. All interviewees seemed to agree that teaching crafts in Rnland is changing in terms of how teachers are prepared, who writes curriculum, the content of the curriculum, and the configuration of craft in the comprehensive school curriculum. Some interviewees portended adecline in craft education in public schooling, while others embraced change as part of nation building.",
author = "Garber, {Elizabeth J}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1111/1468-5949.00308",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "132--145",
journal = "International Journal of Art and Design Education",
issn = "1476-8062",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Craft education in finland

T2 - Definitions, rationales, and the future

AU - Garber, Elizabeth J

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The status, content, and social factors influencing craft education in Rnland, a standard subject in comprehensive schools, were examined during interviews with craft teachers, craft teacher preparers, and educational administrators. In this paper, the following areas are examined: How are crafts defined? What rationales and cultural and social factors keep craft education robust and what factors threaten it? What is perceived as the future of craft education?Definitions of crafts in schooling varied among interviewees, with some arguing to maintain traditional divisions between art and craft, and between craft subjects of textiles and technical work, and others noting distinction in these subjects only in the materials and techniques used. Some interviewees associated art teaching with self-expression and craft with skill, materials, and techniques. The context for craft education affected by Rnland's rapid change, after World War II, from a rural agrarian society to an urban and highly technological one, is understood as putting pressure on craft education to remain meaningful. Rationales given by interviewees forteaching craft in schools fell into five categories: craft provides 1) cognitive development in several dimensions, 2) learning about living in the world, 3) Rnnish traditions and culture, 4)social and individual growth, and 5)abreakfrom the demands of academic subjects. All interviewees seemed to agree that teaching crafts in Rnland is changing in terms of how teachers are prepared, who writes curriculum, the content of the curriculum, and the configuration of craft in the comprehensive school curriculum. Some interviewees portended adecline in craft education in public schooling, while others embraced change as part of nation building.

AB - The status, content, and social factors influencing craft education in Rnland, a standard subject in comprehensive schools, were examined during interviews with craft teachers, craft teacher preparers, and educational administrators. In this paper, the following areas are examined: How are crafts defined? What rationales and cultural and social factors keep craft education robust and what factors threaten it? What is perceived as the future of craft education?Definitions of crafts in schooling varied among interviewees, with some arguing to maintain traditional divisions between art and craft, and between craft subjects of textiles and technical work, and others noting distinction in these subjects only in the materials and techniques used. Some interviewees associated art teaching with self-expression and craft with skill, materials, and techniques. The context for craft education affected by Rnland's rapid change, after World War II, from a rural agrarian society to an urban and highly technological one, is understood as putting pressure on craft education to remain meaningful. Rationales given by interviewees forteaching craft in schools fell into five categories: craft provides 1) cognitive development in several dimensions, 2) learning about living in the world, 3) Rnnish traditions and culture, 4)social and individual growth, and 5)abreakfrom the demands of academic subjects. All interviewees seemed to agree that teaching crafts in Rnland is changing in terms of how teachers are prepared, who writes curriculum, the content of the curriculum, and the configuration of craft in the comprehensive school curriculum. Some interviewees portended adecline in craft education in public schooling, while others embraced change as part of nation building.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76849088753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76849088753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1468-5949.00308

DO - 10.1111/1468-5949.00308

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:76849088753

VL - 21

SP - 132

EP - 145

JO - International Journal of Art and Design Education

JF - International Journal of Art and Design Education

SN - 1476-8062

IS - 2

ER -