Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record

James S. Wrobel, William Chagares, Rodney M. Stuck, Frances Weaver, Ryan T. Crews, Lauren Rapacki, Rhonda Paulson, David G Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. Methods: A pre-and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk and clinician acceptability. The intervention hospital's reminder was replaced with a dialogue tick box containing the International Diabetic Foot Classification System to populate risk using health factors. Results: There were no hospital agreement differences for each foot condition except diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, demonstrating higher agreement at the intervention hospital. There were no differences in service agreement adherence or consulting rates although both demonstrated significantly lower consulting rates at study end. The intervention hospital had a significantly lower patient cancellation rate (1% v. 5%, P=0.01) and better coding for grade 3 patients. The new reminder demonstrated high acceptability. Conclusions: The registry system resulted in improved discrimination of the highest foot risk. Further testing is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-287
Number of pages5
JournalInformatics in Primary Care
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Electronic medical equipment
Electronic Health Records
Medical problems
Registries
Foot
Health risks
Diabetic Foot
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
Ticks
Testing
Health

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Amputation prevention
  • Diabetes
  • Diabetic foot
  • Electronic medical record
  • Patient care planning
  • Quality improvement
  • Registries
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Validation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Family Practice
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Wrobel, J. S., Chagares, W., Stuck, R. M., Weaver, F., Crews, R. T., Rapacki, L., ... Armstrong, D. G. (2011). Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record. Informatics in Primary Care, 18(4), 283-287.

Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record. / Wrobel, James S.; Chagares, William; Stuck, Rodney M.; Weaver, Frances; Crews, Ryan T.; Rapacki, Lauren; Paulson, Rhonda; Armstrong, David G.

In: Informatics in Primary Care, Vol. 18, No. 4, 11.2011, p. 283-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wrobel, JS, Chagares, W, Stuck, RM, Weaver, F, Crews, RT, Rapacki, L, Paulson, R & Armstrong, DG 2011, 'Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record', Informatics in Primary Care, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 283-287.
Wrobel JS, Chagares W, Stuck RM, Weaver F, Crews RT, Rapacki L et al. Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record. Informatics in Primary Care. 2011 Nov;18(4):283-287.
Wrobel, James S. ; Chagares, William ; Stuck, Rodney M. ; Weaver, Frances ; Crews, Ryan T. ; Rapacki, Lauren ; Paulson, Rhonda ; Armstrong, David G. / Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record. In: Informatics in Primary Care. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 283-287.
@article{6f59e6c0261d4b4dbcfe099f2f28a630,
title = "Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record",
abstract = "Objective: We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. Methods: A pre-and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk and clinician acceptability. The intervention hospital's reminder was replaced with a dialogue tick box containing the International Diabetic Foot Classification System to populate risk using health factors. Results: There were no hospital agreement differences for each foot condition except diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, demonstrating higher agreement at the intervention hospital. There were no differences in service agreement adherence or consulting rates although both demonstrated significantly lower consulting rates at study end. The intervention hospital had a significantly lower patient cancellation rate (1{\%} v. 5{\%}, P=0.01) and better coding for grade 3 patients. The new reminder demonstrated high acceptability. Conclusions: The registry system resulted in improved discrimination of the highest foot risk. Further testing is recommended.",
keywords = "Amputation, Amputation prevention, Diabetes, Diabetic foot, Electronic medical record, Patient care planning, Quality improvement, Registries, Reproducibility of results, Validation studies",
author = "Wrobel, {James S.} and William Chagares and Stuck, {Rodney M.} and Frances Weaver and Crews, {Ryan T.} and Lauren Rapacki and Rhonda Paulson and Armstrong, {David G}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "283--287",
journal = "BMJ Health and Care Informatics",
issn = "2058-4555",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record

AU - Wrobel, James S.

AU - Chagares, William

AU - Stuck, Rodney M.

AU - Weaver, Frances

AU - Crews, Ryan T.

AU - Rapacki, Lauren

AU - Paulson, Rhonda

AU - Armstrong, David G

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Objective: We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. Methods: A pre-and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk and clinician acceptability. The intervention hospital's reminder was replaced with a dialogue tick box containing the International Diabetic Foot Classification System to populate risk using health factors. Results: There were no hospital agreement differences for each foot condition except diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, demonstrating higher agreement at the intervention hospital. There were no differences in service agreement adherence or consulting rates although both demonstrated significantly lower consulting rates at study end. The intervention hospital had a significantly lower patient cancellation rate (1% v. 5%, P=0.01) and better coding for grade 3 patients. The new reminder demonstrated high acceptability. Conclusions: The registry system resulted in improved discrimination of the highest foot risk. Further testing is recommended.

AB - Objective: We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. Methods: A pre-and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk and clinician acceptability. The intervention hospital's reminder was replaced with a dialogue tick box containing the International Diabetic Foot Classification System to populate risk using health factors. Results: There were no hospital agreement differences for each foot condition except diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, demonstrating higher agreement at the intervention hospital. There were no differences in service agreement adherence or consulting rates although both demonstrated significantly lower consulting rates at study end. The intervention hospital had a significantly lower patient cancellation rate (1% v. 5%, P=0.01) and better coding for grade 3 patients. The new reminder demonstrated high acceptability. Conclusions: The registry system resulted in improved discrimination of the highest foot risk. Further testing is recommended.

KW - Amputation

KW - Amputation prevention

KW - Diabetes

KW - Diabetic foot

KW - Electronic medical record

KW - Patient care planning

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Registries

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Validation studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054997515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054997515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22040855

AN - SCOPUS:80054997515

VL - 18

SP - 283

EP - 287

JO - BMJ Health and Care Informatics

JF - BMJ Health and Care Informatics

SN - 2058-4555

IS - 4

ER -