Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition

R. E. O'Connor, Kenneth I Forster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Six experiments that were designed to test the adequacy of criterion bias explanations of the word frequency effect and the semantic priming effect are reported. It was found that criterion bias models correctly predicted higher error rates in a lexical decision task for nonwords that were misspelled versions of high-frequency words (e.g., MOHTER), rather than low-frequency words (e.g., BOHTER). Also correct was the prediction of increased error rates for misspelled words preceded by a semantically related word (e.g., NURSE-DOTCOR). However, in a misspelling decision task (in which the subject must decide whether the stimulus is a word, a misspelled word, or a nonword), it can be argued that criterion bias should be inoperative, since correct responses must be delayed until all orthographic information has been checked; this should eliminate both frequency and semantic priming effects. This was found not to be the case; clear frequency and priming effects were obtained for both words and misspelled words.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)78-92
Number of pages15
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semantics
Word Recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. / O'Connor, R. E.; Forster, Kenneth I.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.1981, p. 78-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef24315d7b3e4bb7b9577242e6d76106,
title = "Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition",
abstract = "Six experiments that were designed to test the adequacy of criterion bias explanations of the word frequency effect and the semantic priming effect are reported. It was found that criterion bias models correctly predicted higher error rates in a lexical decision task for nonwords that were misspelled versions of high-frequency words (e.g., MOHTER), rather than low-frequency words (e.g., BOHTER). Also correct was the prediction of increased error rates for misspelled words preceded by a semantically related word (e.g., NURSE-DOTCOR). However, in a misspelling decision task (in which the subject must decide whether the stimulus is a word, a misspelled word, or a nonword), it can be argued that criterion bias should be inoperative, since correct responses must be delayed until all orthographic information has been checked; this should eliminate both frequency and semantic priming effects. This was found not to be the case; clear frequency and priming effects were obtained for both words and misspelled words.",
author = "O'Connor, {R. E.} and Forster, {Kenneth I}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196953",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "78--92",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition

AU - O'Connor, R. E.

AU - Forster, Kenneth I

PY - 1981/1

Y1 - 1981/1

N2 - Six experiments that were designed to test the adequacy of criterion bias explanations of the word frequency effect and the semantic priming effect are reported. It was found that criterion bias models correctly predicted higher error rates in a lexical decision task for nonwords that were misspelled versions of high-frequency words (e.g., MOHTER), rather than low-frequency words (e.g., BOHTER). Also correct was the prediction of increased error rates for misspelled words preceded by a semantically related word (e.g., NURSE-DOTCOR). However, in a misspelling decision task (in which the subject must decide whether the stimulus is a word, a misspelled word, or a nonword), it can be argued that criterion bias should be inoperative, since correct responses must be delayed until all orthographic information has been checked; this should eliminate both frequency and semantic priming effects. This was found not to be the case; clear frequency and priming effects were obtained for both words and misspelled words.

AB - Six experiments that were designed to test the adequacy of criterion bias explanations of the word frequency effect and the semantic priming effect are reported. It was found that criterion bias models correctly predicted higher error rates in a lexical decision task for nonwords that were misspelled versions of high-frequency words (e.g., MOHTER), rather than low-frequency words (e.g., BOHTER). Also correct was the prediction of increased error rates for misspelled words preceded by a semantically related word (e.g., NURSE-DOTCOR). However, in a misspelling decision task (in which the subject must decide whether the stimulus is a word, a misspelled word, or a nonword), it can be argued that criterion bias should be inoperative, since correct responses must be delayed until all orthographic information has been checked; this should eliminate both frequency and semantic priming effects. This was found not to be the case; clear frequency and priming effects were obtained for both words and misspelled words.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019436879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019436879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196953

DO - 10.3758/BF03196953

M3 - Article

C2 - 7231172

AN - SCOPUS:0019436879

VL - 9

SP - 78

EP - 92

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -