Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation: An interpretive descriptive study

Halley Ruppel, Marjorie Funk, Robin Whittemore, Shu-Fen Wung, Christopher P. Bonafide, Holly Powell Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To explore clinical reasoning about alarm customisation among nurses in intensive care units. Background: Critical care nurses are responsible for detecting and rapidly acting upon changes in patients’ clinical condition. Nurses use medical devices including bedside physiologic monitors to assist them in their practice. Customising alarm settings on these devices can help nurses better monitor their patients and reduce the number of clinically irrelevant alarms. As a result, customisation may also help address the problem of alarm fatigue. However, little is known about nurses' clinical reasoning with respect to customising physiologic monitor alarm settings. Design: This article is an in-depth report of the qualitative arm of a mixed methods study conducted using an interpretive descriptive methodological approach. Methods: Twenty-seven nurses were purposively sampled from three intensive care units in an academic medical centre. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone and were analysed using thematic analysis. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines were used. Results: Four themes were identified from the interview data: unit alarm culture and context, nurse attributes, motivation to customise and customisation “know-how.” A conceptual model demonstrating the relationship of these themes was developed to portray the factors that affect nurses’ customisation of alarms. Conclusions: In addition to drawing on clinical data, nurses customised physiologic monitor alarms based on their level of clinical expertise and comfort. Nurses were influenced by the alarm culture on their clinical unit and colleagues’ and patients’ responses to alarms, as well as their own technical understanding of the physiologic monitors. Relevance to clinical practice: The results of this study can be used to design strategies to support the application of clinical reasoning to alarm management, which may contribute to more appropriate alarm customisation practices and improvements in safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Clinical Alarms
Critical Care
Nurses
Intensive Care Units
Interviews
Equipment and Supplies
Qualitative Research
Telephone

Keywords

  • clinical alarms
  • critical care nursing
  • decision-making
  • intensive care units
  • monitoring
  • patient safety
  • physiologic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation : An interpretive descriptive study. / Ruppel, Halley; Funk, Marjorie; Whittemore, Robin; Wung, Shu-Fen; Bonafide, Christopher P.; Powell Kennedy, Holly.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruppel, Halley ; Funk, Marjorie ; Whittemore, Robin ; Wung, Shu-Fen ; Bonafide, Christopher P. ; Powell Kennedy, Holly. / Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation : An interpretive descriptive study. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019.
@article{d51b53e038804ef8a5ee7df43dbf428d,
title = "Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation: An interpretive descriptive study",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To explore clinical reasoning about alarm customisation among nurses in intensive care units. Background: Critical care nurses are responsible for detecting and rapidly acting upon changes in patients’ clinical condition. Nurses use medical devices including bedside physiologic monitors to assist them in their practice. Customising alarm settings on these devices can help nurses better monitor their patients and reduce the number of clinically irrelevant alarms. As a result, customisation may also help address the problem of alarm fatigue. However, little is known about nurses' clinical reasoning with respect to customising physiologic monitor alarm settings. Design: This article is an in-depth report of the qualitative arm of a mixed methods study conducted using an interpretive descriptive methodological approach. Methods: Twenty-seven nurses were purposively sampled from three intensive care units in an academic medical centre. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone and were analysed using thematic analysis. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines were used. Results: Four themes were identified from the interview data: unit alarm culture and context, nurse attributes, motivation to customise and customisation “know-how.” A conceptual model demonstrating the relationship of these themes was developed to portray the factors that affect nurses’ customisation of alarms. Conclusions: In addition to drawing on clinical data, nurses customised physiologic monitor alarms based on their level of clinical expertise and comfort. Nurses were influenced by the alarm culture on their clinical unit and colleagues’ and patients’ responses to alarms, as well as their own technical understanding of the physiologic monitors. Relevance to clinical practice: The results of this study can be used to design strategies to support the application of clinical reasoning to alarm management, which may contribute to more appropriate alarm customisation practices and improvements in safety.",
keywords = "clinical alarms, critical care nursing, decision-making, intensive care units, monitoring, patient safety, physiologic",
author = "Halley Ruppel and Marjorie Funk and Robin Whittemore and Shu-Fen Wung and Bonafide, {Christopher P.} and {Powell Kennedy}, Holly",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.14866",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation

T2 - An interpretive descriptive study

AU - Ruppel, Halley

AU - Funk, Marjorie

AU - Whittemore, Robin

AU - Wung, Shu-Fen

AU - Bonafide, Christopher P.

AU - Powell Kennedy, Holly

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Aims and objectives: To explore clinical reasoning about alarm customisation among nurses in intensive care units. Background: Critical care nurses are responsible for detecting and rapidly acting upon changes in patients’ clinical condition. Nurses use medical devices including bedside physiologic monitors to assist them in their practice. Customising alarm settings on these devices can help nurses better monitor their patients and reduce the number of clinically irrelevant alarms. As a result, customisation may also help address the problem of alarm fatigue. However, little is known about nurses' clinical reasoning with respect to customising physiologic monitor alarm settings. Design: This article is an in-depth report of the qualitative arm of a mixed methods study conducted using an interpretive descriptive methodological approach. Methods: Twenty-seven nurses were purposively sampled from three intensive care units in an academic medical centre. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone and were analysed using thematic analysis. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines were used. Results: Four themes were identified from the interview data: unit alarm culture and context, nurse attributes, motivation to customise and customisation “know-how.” A conceptual model demonstrating the relationship of these themes was developed to portray the factors that affect nurses’ customisation of alarms. Conclusions: In addition to drawing on clinical data, nurses customised physiologic monitor alarms based on their level of clinical expertise and comfort. Nurses were influenced by the alarm culture on their clinical unit and colleagues’ and patients’ responses to alarms, as well as their own technical understanding of the physiologic monitors. Relevance to clinical practice: The results of this study can be used to design strategies to support the application of clinical reasoning to alarm management, which may contribute to more appropriate alarm customisation practices and improvements in safety.

AB - Aims and objectives: To explore clinical reasoning about alarm customisation among nurses in intensive care units. Background: Critical care nurses are responsible for detecting and rapidly acting upon changes in patients’ clinical condition. Nurses use medical devices including bedside physiologic monitors to assist them in their practice. Customising alarm settings on these devices can help nurses better monitor their patients and reduce the number of clinically irrelevant alarms. As a result, customisation may also help address the problem of alarm fatigue. However, little is known about nurses' clinical reasoning with respect to customising physiologic monitor alarm settings. Design: This article is an in-depth report of the qualitative arm of a mixed methods study conducted using an interpretive descriptive methodological approach. Methods: Twenty-seven nurses were purposively sampled from three intensive care units in an academic medical centre. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone and were analysed using thematic analysis. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines were used. Results: Four themes were identified from the interview data: unit alarm culture and context, nurse attributes, motivation to customise and customisation “know-how.” A conceptual model demonstrating the relationship of these themes was developed to portray the factors that affect nurses’ customisation of alarms. Conclusions: In addition to drawing on clinical data, nurses customised physiologic monitor alarms based on their level of clinical expertise and comfort. Nurses were influenced by the alarm culture on their clinical unit and colleagues’ and patients’ responses to alarms, as well as their own technical understanding of the physiologic monitors. Relevance to clinical practice: The results of this study can be used to design strategies to support the application of clinical reasoning to alarm management, which may contribute to more appropriate alarm customisation practices and improvements in safety.

KW - clinical alarms

KW - critical care nursing

KW - decision-making

KW - intensive care units

KW - monitoring

KW - patient safety

KW - physiologic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064672204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064672204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.14866

DO - 10.1111/jocn.14866

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064672204

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

ER -