CT interpretation in a telestroke network

Agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist

Bart M. Demaerschalk, Bentley J Bobrow, Rema Raman, Karin Ernstrom, Joseph M. Hoxworth, Ameet C. Patel, Terri Ellen J Kiernan, Maria I. Aguilar, Timothy J. Ingall, David W. Dodick, Brett C. Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose-The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and each of 2 groups, spoke hospital radiologists and hub hospital vascular neurologists (telestrokologists). Methods-The Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera Arizona trial was a prospective, urban single-hub, rural 2-spoke, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of a 2-way, site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine and teleradiology system designed for remote evaluation of adult patients with acute stroke versus telephone consultation to assess eligibility for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. In the telemedicine arm, the subjects' CT scans were interpreted by the hub telestrokologist and in the telephone arm by the spoke radiologist. All subjects' CT scans were subsequently interpreted centrally, independently, and blindly by 2 hub neuroradiologists. The primary CT outcome was determination of a CT-based contraindication to thrombolytic treatment. Kappa statistics and exact agreement rates were used to analyze interobserver agreement. Results-Fifty-four subjects underwent random assignment. The overall agreement for the presence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent (0.91) and did not differ substantially between the hub telestrokologist to neuroradiologist and spoke radiologist to neuroradiologist (0.92 and 0.89, respectively). Conclusions-In the context of a telestroke network designed to assess patients with acute stroke syndromes, agreement over the presence or absence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent whether the comparisons were between a telestrokologist and neuroradiologist or between spoke radiologist and neuroradiologist. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623350.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3095-3097
Number of pages3
JournalStroke
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Stroke
Telemedicine
Telephone
Teleradiology
Reading
Decision Making
Emergencies
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Observation
Radiologists
Neurologists
Clinical Trials
Guidelines
Brain
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • computed tomography
  • randomized controlled trials
  • rural health
  • rural hospitals
  • stroke
  • telemedicine
  • telestroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

CT interpretation in a telestroke network : Agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. / Demaerschalk, Bart M.; Bobrow, Bentley J; Raman, Rema; Ernstrom, Karin; Hoxworth, Joseph M.; Patel, Ameet C.; Kiernan, Terri Ellen J; Aguilar, Maria I.; Ingall, Timothy J.; Dodick, David W.; Meyer, Brett C.

In: Stroke, Vol. 43, No. 11, 11.2012, p. 3095-3097.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Demaerschalk, BM, Bobrow, BJ, Raman, R, Ernstrom, K, Hoxworth, JM, Patel, AC, Kiernan, TEJ, Aguilar, MI, Ingall, TJ, Dodick, DW & Meyer, BC 2012, 'CT interpretation in a telestroke network: Agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist', Stroke, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 3095-3097. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255
Demaerschalk, Bart M. ; Bobrow, Bentley J ; Raman, Rema ; Ernstrom, Karin ; Hoxworth, Joseph M. ; Patel, Ameet C. ; Kiernan, Terri Ellen J ; Aguilar, Maria I. ; Ingall, Timothy J. ; Dodick, David W. ; Meyer, Brett C. / CT interpretation in a telestroke network : Agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. In: Stroke. 2012 ; Vol. 43, No. 11. pp. 3095-3097.
@article{af8df6fefd884e68b6235b1be1c2b680,
title = "CT interpretation in a telestroke network: Agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist",
abstract = "Background and Purpose-The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and each of 2 groups, spoke hospital radiologists and hub hospital vascular neurologists (telestrokologists). Methods-The Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera Arizona trial was a prospective, urban single-hub, rural 2-spoke, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of a 2-way, site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine and teleradiology system designed for remote evaluation of adult patients with acute stroke versus telephone consultation to assess eligibility for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. In the telemedicine arm, the subjects' CT scans were interpreted by the hub telestrokologist and in the telephone arm by the spoke radiologist. All subjects' CT scans were subsequently interpreted centrally, independently, and blindly by 2 hub neuroradiologists. The primary CT outcome was determination of a CT-based contraindication to thrombolytic treatment. Kappa statistics and exact agreement rates were used to analyze interobserver agreement. Results-Fifty-four subjects underwent random assignment. The overall agreement for the presence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent (0.91) and did not differ substantially between the hub telestrokologist to neuroradiologist and spoke radiologist to neuroradiologist (0.92 and 0.89, respectively). Conclusions-In the context of a telestroke network designed to assess patients with acute stroke syndromes, agreement over the presence or absence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent whether the comparisons were between a telestrokologist and neuroradiologist or between spoke radiologist and neuroradiologist. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623350.",
keywords = "computed tomography, randomized controlled trials, rural health, rural hospitals, stroke, telemedicine, telestroke",
author = "Demaerschalk, {Bart M.} and Bobrow, {Bentley J} and Rema Raman and Karin Ernstrom and Hoxworth, {Joseph M.} and Patel, {Ameet C.} and Kiernan, {Terri Ellen J} and Aguilar, {Maria I.} and Ingall, {Timothy J.} and Dodick, {David W.} and Meyer, {Brett C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "3095--3097",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CT interpretation in a telestroke network

T2 - Agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist

AU - Demaerschalk, Bart M.

AU - Bobrow, Bentley J

AU - Raman, Rema

AU - Ernstrom, Karin

AU - Hoxworth, Joseph M.

AU - Patel, Ameet C.

AU - Kiernan, Terri Ellen J

AU - Aguilar, Maria I.

AU - Ingall, Timothy J.

AU - Dodick, David W.

AU - Meyer, Brett C.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Background and Purpose-The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and each of 2 groups, spoke hospital radiologists and hub hospital vascular neurologists (telestrokologists). Methods-The Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera Arizona trial was a prospective, urban single-hub, rural 2-spoke, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of a 2-way, site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine and teleradiology system designed for remote evaluation of adult patients with acute stroke versus telephone consultation to assess eligibility for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. In the telemedicine arm, the subjects' CT scans were interpreted by the hub telestrokologist and in the telephone arm by the spoke radiologist. All subjects' CT scans were subsequently interpreted centrally, independently, and blindly by 2 hub neuroradiologists. The primary CT outcome was determination of a CT-based contraindication to thrombolytic treatment. Kappa statistics and exact agreement rates were used to analyze interobserver agreement. Results-Fifty-four subjects underwent random assignment. The overall agreement for the presence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent (0.91) and did not differ substantially between the hub telestrokologist to neuroradiologist and spoke radiologist to neuroradiologist (0.92 and 0.89, respectively). Conclusions-In the context of a telestroke network designed to assess patients with acute stroke syndromes, agreement over the presence or absence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent whether the comparisons were between a telestrokologist and neuroradiologist or between spoke radiologist and neuroradiologist. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623350.

AB - Background and Purpose-The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and each of 2 groups, spoke hospital radiologists and hub hospital vascular neurologists (telestrokologists). Methods-The Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera Arizona trial was a prospective, urban single-hub, rural 2-spoke, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of a 2-way, site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine and teleradiology system designed for remote evaluation of adult patients with acute stroke versus telephone consultation to assess eligibility for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. In the telemedicine arm, the subjects' CT scans were interpreted by the hub telestrokologist and in the telephone arm by the spoke radiologist. All subjects' CT scans were subsequently interpreted centrally, independently, and blindly by 2 hub neuroradiologists. The primary CT outcome was determination of a CT-based contraindication to thrombolytic treatment. Kappa statistics and exact agreement rates were used to analyze interobserver agreement. Results-Fifty-four subjects underwent random assignment. The overall agreement for the presence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent (0.91) and did not differ substantially between the hub telestrokologist to neuroradiologist and spoke radiologist to neuroradiologist (0.92 and 0.89, respectively). Conclusions-In the context of a telestroke network designed to assess patients with acute stroke syndromes, agreement over the presence or absence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent whether the comparisons were between a telestrokologist and neuroradiologist or between spoke radiologist and neuroradiologist. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623350.

KW - computed tomography

KW - randomized controlled trials

KW - rural health

KW - rural hospitals

KW - stroke

KW - telemedicine

KW - telestroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868190968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868190968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255

DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 3095

EP - 3097

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 11

ER -