CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen

V. Raptopoulos, A. Davidoff, A. Karellas, M. A. Davis, B. L. Coolbaugh, E. H. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Visualization of the head of the pancreas by CT was prospectively evaluated in two groups of 100 patients who did not have pancreatic disease. Patients were given either a fat-density oral contrast material (12.5% corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide) or a conventional high-density oral contrast material (barium suspension or iodinated solution). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjects' tolerance to the two regimens. There was, however, a significant improvement in ability to distinguish the head of the pancreas from the duodenal C-loop when the fat-density contrast material was given. When pancreaticoduodenal discrimination was graded, patients given corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide received an average score of 0.94, whereas those given the high-density agent received an average score of 0.74, with 1.00 being the highest possible score (p < .005). These data suggest that for routine CT evaluation of the head of the pancreas, a combination of corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide may be superior to the conventional high-density oral contrast agents given without metoclopramide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1303-1306
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume150
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Metoclopramide
Corn Oil
X Ray Computed Tomography
Duodenum
Contrast Media
Oral Administration
Pancreas
Emulsions
Fats
Prospective Studies
Pancreatic Diseases
Barium
Suspensions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Raptopoulos, V., Davidoff, A., Karellas, A., Davis, M. A., Coolbaugh, B. L., & Smith, E. H. (1988). CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen. American Journal of Roentgenology, 150(6), 1303-1306. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303

CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen. / Raptopoulos, V.; Davidoff, A.; Karellas, A.; Davis, M. A.; Coolbaugh, B. L.; Smith, E. H.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 150, No. 6, 01.01.1988, p. 1303-1306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raptopoulos, V, Davidoff, A, Karellas, A, Davis, MA, Coolbaugh, BL & Smith, EH 1988, 'CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 1303-1306. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303
Raptopoulos, V. ; Davidoff, A. ; Karellas, A. ; Davis, M. A. ; Coolbaugh, B. L. ; Smith, E. H. / CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1988 ; Vol. 150, No. 6. pp. 1303-1306.
@article{66af79d3230040b4a7e0869fcd56f75a,
title = "CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen",
abstract = "Visualization of the head of the pancreas by CT was prospectively evaluated in two groups of 100 patients who did not have pancreatic disease. Patients were given either a fat-density oral contrast material (12.5{\%} corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide) or a conventional high-density oral contrast material (barium suspension or iodinated solution). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjects' tolerance to the two regimens. There was, however, a significant improvement in ability to distinguish the head of the pancreas from the duodenal C-loop when the fat-density contrast material was given. When pancreaticoduodenal discrimination was graded, patients given corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide received an average score of 0.94, whereas those given the high-density agent received an average score of 0.74, with 1.00 being the highest possible score (p < .005). These data suggest that for routine CT evaluation of the head of the pancreas, a combination of corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide may be superior to the conventional high-density oral contrast agents given without metoclopramide.",
author = "V. Raptopoulos and A. Davidoff and A. Karellas and Davis, {M. A.} and Coolbaugh, {B. L.} and Smith, {E. H.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "1303--1306",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen

AU - Raptopoulos, V.

AU - Davidoff, A.

AU - Karellas, A.

AU - Davis, M. A.

AU - Coolbaugh, B. L.

AU - Smith, E. H.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Visualization of the head of the pancreas by CT was prospectively evaluated in two groups of 100 patients who did not have pancreatic disease. Patients were given either a fat-density oral contrast material (12.5% corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide) or a conventional high-density oral contrast material (barium suspension or iodinated solution). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjects' tolerance to the two regimens. There was, however, a significant improvement in ability to distinguish the head of the pancreas from the duodenal C-loop when the fat-density contrast material was given. When pancreaticoduodenal discrimination was graded, patients given corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide received an average score of 0.94, whereas those given the high-density agent received an average score of 0.74, with 1.00 being the highest possible score (p < .005). These data suggest that for routine CT evaluation of the head of the pancreas, a combination of corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide may be superior to the conventional high-density oral contrast agents given without metoclopramide.

AB - Visualization of the head of the pancreas by CT was prospectively evaluated in two groups of 100 patients who did not have pancreatic disease. Patients were given either a fat-density oral contrast material (12.5% corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide) or a conventional high-density oral contrast material (barium suspension or iodinated solution). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjects' tolerance to the two regimens. There was, however, a significant improvement in ability to distinguish the head of the pancreas from the duodenal C-loop when the fat-density contrast material was given. When pancreaticoduodenal discrimination was graded, patients given corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide received an average score of 0.94, whereas those given the high-density agent received an average score of 0.74, with 1.00 being the highest possible score (p < .005). These data suggest that for routine CT evaluation of the head of the pancreas, a combination of corn-oil emulsion and metoclopramide may be superior to the conventional high-density oral contrast agents given without metoclopramide.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023881578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023881578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303

DO - 10.2214/ajr.150.6.1303

M3 - Article

C2 - 3259368

AN - SCOPUS:0023881578

VL - 150

SP - 1303

EP - 1306

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -