Cues and Components in Multiattribute Evaluation

Terence Connolly, Joydeep Srivastava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiattribute additive evaluation models largely ignore the causal structure connecting attributes and overall evaluations. We propose here a distinction between two such causal structures. In "cue-type" tasks, attributes reflect or indicate the value of a distal variable measuring all or part of the entity′s worth. In "component-type" tasks, attributes are themselves the constitutive elements of worth. Attributes of the two kinds should be combined differently. Results are reported from two experiments in which the verbal context was manipulated so as to induce either cue-type or component-type interpretations of identical attribute sets. The data strongly suggest that subjects are sensitive to the distinction and respond in theoretically appropriate ways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-228
Number of pages10
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1995

Fingerprint

Cues
Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Cues and Components in Multiattribute Evaluation. / Connolly, Terence; Srivastava, Joydeep.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 64, No. 2, 11.1995, p. 219-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89a5f0d4845047e6b652458a46b919b3,
title = "Cues and Components in Multiattribute Evaluation",
abstract = "Multiattribute additive evaluation models largely ignore the causal structure connecting attributes and overall evaluations. We propose here a distinction between two such causal structures. In {"}cue-type{"} tasks, attributes reflect or indicate the value of a distal variable measuring all or part of the entity′s worth. In {"}component-type{"} tasks, attributes are themselves the constitutive elements of worth. Attributes of the two kinds should be combined differently. Results are reported from two experiments in which the verbal context was manipulated so as to induce either cue-type or component-type interpretations of identical attribute sets. The data strongly suggest that subjects are sensitive to the distinction and respond in theoretically appropriate ways.",
author = "Terence Connolly and Joydeep Srivastava",
year = "1995",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.1995.1101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "219--228",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cues and Components in Multiattribute Evaluation

AU - Connolly, Terence

AU - Srivastava, Joydeep

PY - 1995/11

Y1 - 1995/11

N2 - Multiattribute additive evaluation models largely ignore the causal structure connecting attributes and overall evaluations. We propose here a distinction between two such causal structures. In "cue-type" tasks, attributes reflect or indicate the value of a distal variable measuring all or part of the entity′s worth. In "component-type" tasks, attributes are themselves the constitutive elements of worth. Attributes of the two kinds should be combined differently. Results are reported from two experiments in which the verbal context was manipulated so as to induce either cue-type or component-type interpretations of identical attribute sets. The data strongly suggest that subjects are sensitive to the distinction and respond in theoretically appropriate ways.

AB - Multiattribute additive evaluation models largely ignore the causal structure connecting attributes and overall evaluations. We propose here a distinction between two such causal structures. In "cue-type" tasks, attributes reflect or indicate the value of a distal variable measuring all or part of the entity′s worth. In "component-type" tasks, attributes are themselves the constitutive elements of worth. Attributes of the two kinds should be combined differently. Results are reported from two experiments in which the verbal context was manipulated so as to induce either cue-type or component-type interpretations of identical attribute sets. The data strongly suggest that subjects are sensitive to the distinction and respond in theoretically appropriate ways.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000444022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000444022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1995.1101

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1995.1101

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000444022

VL - 64

SP - 219

EP - 228

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -