Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control: A systematic review

Jayleen K.L. Gunn, Kacey C Ernst, Katherine E. Center, Kristi Bischoff, Annabelle V. Nuñez, Megan Huynh, Amanda Okello, Mary H. Hayden

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) cause significant mortality and morbidity in low-income and middle-income countries and present a risk to high-income countries. Vector control programmes may confront social and cultural norms that impede their execution. Anecdotal evidence suggests that incorporating women in the design, delivery and adoption of health interventions increases acceptance and compliance. A better understanding of programmes that have attempted to increase women's involvement in vector control could help shape best practices. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and critically summarise evidence regarding the effectiveness of women participating in vector control. Methods: Seven databases were searched from inception to 21 December 2015. Two investigators independently reviewed all titles and abstracts for relevant articles. Grey literature was searched by assessing websites that focus on international development and vector control. Results: In total, 23 articles representing 17 unique studies were included in this review. Studies discussed the involvement of women in the control of vectors for malaria (n=10), dengue (n=8), human African trypanosomiasis (n=3), schistosomiasis (n=1) and a combination (malaria and schistosomiasis, n=1). Seven programmes were found in the grey literature or through personal communications. Available literature indicates that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes and, when given the opportunity, they can create and sustain businesses that aim to decrease the burden of VBDs in their communities. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes at the community level. However, rigorous comparative effectiveness studies need to be conducted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere000366
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Disease Vectors
Schistosomiasis
Malaria
African Trypanosomiasis
Literature
Dengue
Practice Guidelines
Compliance
Communication
Research Personnel
Databases
Morbidity
Mortality
Health
Social Norms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Gunn, J. K. L., Ernst, K. C., Center, K. E., Bischoff, K., Nuñez, A. V., Huynh, M., ... Hayden, M. H. (2018). Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control: A systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 3(1), [e000366]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000366

Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control : A systematic review. / Gunn, Jayleen K.L.; Ernst, Kacey C; Center, Katherine E.; Bischoff, Kristi; Nuñez, Annabelle V.; Huynh, Megan; Okello, Amanda; Hayden, Mary H.

In: BMJ Global Health, Vol. 3, No. 1, e000366, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gunn, JKL, Ernst, KC, Center, KE, Bischoff, K, Nuñez, AV, Huynh, M, Okello, A & Hayden, MH 2018, 'Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control: A systematic review', BMJ Global Health, vol. 3, no. 1, e000366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000366
Gunn, Jayleen K.L. ; Ernst, Kacey C ; Center, Katherine E. ; Bischoff, Kristi ; Nuñez, Annabelle V. ; Huynh, Megan ; Okello, Amanda ; Hayden, Mary H. / Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control : A systematic review. In: BMJ Global Health. 2018 ; Vol. 3, No. 1.
@article{74b0226d00cc4427b61e26682f14a3c1,
title = "Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control: A systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) cause significant mortality and morbidity in low-income and middle-income countries and present a risk to high-income countries. Vector control programmes may confront social and cultural norms that impede their execution. Anecdotal evidence suggests that incorporating women in the design, delivery and adoption of health interventions increases acceptance and compliance. A better understanding of programmes that have attempted to increase women's involvement in vector control could help shape best practices. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and critically summarise evidence regarding the effectiveness of women participating in vector control. Methods: Seven databases were searched from inception to 21 December 2015. Two investigators independently reviewed all titles and abstracts for relevant articles. Grey literature was searched by assessing websites that focus on international development and vector control. Results: In total, 23 articles representing 17 unique studies were included in this review. Studies discussed the involvement of women in the control of vectors for malaria (n=10), dengue (n=8), human African trypanosomiasis (n=3), schistosomiasis (n=1) and a combination (malaria and schistosomiasis, n=1). Seven programmes were found in the grey literature or through personal communications. Available literature indicates that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes and, when given the opportunity, they can create and sustain businesses that aim to decrease the burden of VBDs in their communities. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes at the community level. However, rigorous comparative effectiveness studies need to be conducted.",
author = "Gunn, {Jayleen K.L.} and Ernst, {Kacey C} and Center, {Katherine E.} and Kristi Bischoff and Nu{\~n}ez, {Annabelle V.} and Megan Huynh and Amanda Okello and Hayden, {Mary H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000366",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "BMJ Global Health",
issn = "2059-7908",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Gunn, Jayleen K.L.

AU - Ernst, Kacey C

AU - Center, Katherine E.

AU - Bischoff, Kristi

AU - Nuñez, Annabelle V.

AU - Huynh, Megan

AU - Okello, Amanda

AU - Hayden, Mary H.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) cause significant mortality and morbidity in low-income and middle-income countries and present a risk to high-income countries. Vector control programmes may confront social and cultural norms that impede their execution. Anecdotal evidence suggests that incorporating women in the design, delivery and adoption of health interventions increases acceptance and compliance. A better understanding of programmes that have attempted to increase women's involvement in vector control could help shape best practices. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and critically summarise evidence regarding the effectiveness of women participating in vector control. Methods: Seven databases were searched from inception to 21 December 2015. Two investigators independently reviewed all titles and abstracts for relevant articles. Grey literature was searched by assessing websites that focus on international development and vector control. Results: In total, 23 articles representing 17 unique studies were included in this review. Studies discussed the involvement of women in the control of vectors for malaria (n=10), dengue (n=8), human African trypanosomiasis (n=3), schistosomiasis (n=1) and a combination (malaria and schistosomiasis, n=1). Seven programmes were found in the grey literature or through personal communications. Available literature indicates that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes and, when given the opportunity, they can create and sustain businesses that aim to decrease the burden of VBDs in their communities. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes at the community level. However, rigorous comparative effectiveness studies need to be conducted.

AB - Introduction: Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) cause significant mortality and morbidity in low-income and middle-income countries and present a risk to high-income countries. Vector control programmes may confront social and cultural norms that impede their execution. Anecdotal evidence suggests that incorporating women in the design, delivery and adoption of health interventions increases acceptance and compliance. A better understanding of programmes that have attempted to increase women's involvement in vector control could help shape best practices. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and critically summarise evidence regarding the effectiveness of women participating in vector control. Methods: Seven databases were searched from inception to 21 December 2015. Two investigators independently reviewed all titles and abstracts for relevant articles. Grey literature was searched by assessing websites that focus on international development and vector control. Results: In total, 23 articles representing 17 unique studies were included in this review. Studies discussed the involvement of women in the control of vectors for malaria (n=10), dengue (n=8), human African trypanosomiasis (n=3), schistosomiasis (n=1) and a combination (malaria and schistosomiasis, n=1). Seven programmes were found in the grey literature or through personal communications. Available literature indicates that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes and, when given the opportunity, they can create and sustain businesses that aim to decrease the burden of VBDs in their communities. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that women can be successfully engaged in vector control programmes at the community level. However, rigorous comparative effectiveness studies need to be conducted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059994363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059994363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000366

DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000366

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85059994363

VL - 3

JO - BMJ Global Health

JF - BMJ Global Health

SN - 2059-7908

IS - 1

M1 - e000366

ER -