Damage control laparotomy

A vital tool once overused

Guillermo Higa, Randall S Friese, Terence S Okeeffe, Julie Wynne, Paul Bowlby, Michelle Ziemba, Rifat - Latifi, Narong Kulvatunyou, Peter M Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Trauma surgery is in constant evolution as is the use of damage control laparotomy (DCL). The purpose of this study was to report the change in usage of DCL over time and its effect on outcome. Methods: Trauma patients requiring laparotomies during a 3-year (2006-2008) period were reviewed. DCL was defined as laparotomy when fascia was not closed at the first operation. Results: There were 14,534 trauma patients evaluated, and 843 laparotomies were performed on 532 patients during the study period. The number of patients requiring open laparotomies slightly increased while the demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar during the study period. The number of patient requiring DCL significantly decreased from 36.3% (53 of 146) in 2006 to 8.8% (15 of 170) in 2008 (p < 0.001). During this same time period, the mortality rate for patients requiring open laparotomy significantly decreased from 21.9% in 2006 to 12.9% in 2008 (p = 0.05). The decreased use of DCL resulted in a 33.3% reduction in the number of laparotomies performed. The decrease in average costs and charges is projected to result in savings of $2.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Conclusions: The use of DCL was significantly decreased by 78% during the study with significantly improved outcome. The improved outcome and decreased resource utilization can reduce health care costs and charges. Although DCL may be a vital aspect of trauma surgery, it can be used more selectively with improved outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-59
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Laparotomy
Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Fascia
Health Care Costs
Demography
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Abdominal compartment syndrome
  • Bleeding
  • Cost
  • Damage control
  • Laparotomy
  • Mortality
  • Resuscitation
  • Shock
  • Surgery
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Damage control laparotomy : A vital tool once overused. / Higa, Guillermo; Friese, Randall S; Okeeffe, Terence S; Wynne, Julie; Bowlby, Paul; Ziemba, Michelle; Latifi, Rifat -; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Rhee, Peter M.

In: Journal of Trauma, Vol. 69, No. 1, 07.2010, p. 53-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Higa, Guillermo ; Friese, Randall S ; Okeeffe, Terence S ; Wynne, Julie ; Bowlby, Paul ; Ziemba, Michelle ; Latifi, Rifat - ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Rhee, Peter M. / Damage control laparotomy : A vital tool once overused. In: Journal of Trauma. 2010 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 53-59.
@article{7f0745ee01e842ba885cd94a1c0cccea,
title = "Damage control laparotomy: A vital tool once overused",
abstract = "Background: Trauma surgery is in constant evolution as is the use of damage control laparotomy (DCL). The purpose of this study was to report the change in usage of DCL over time and its effect on outcome. Methods: Trauma patients requiring laparotomies during a 3-year (2006-2008) period were reviewed. DCL was defined as laparotomy when fascia was not closed at the first operation. Results: There were 14,534 trauma patients evaluated, and 843 laparotomies were performed on 532 patients during the study period. The number of patients requiring open laparotomies slightly increased while the demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar during the study period. The number of patient requiring DCL significantly decreased from 36.3{\%} (53 of 146) in 2006 to 8.8{\%} (15 of 170) in 2008 (p < 0.001). During this same time period, the mortality rate for patients requiring open laparotomy significantly decreased from 21.9{\%} in 2006 to 12.9{\%} in 2008 (p = 0.05). The decreased use of DCL resulted in a 33.3{\%} reduction in the number of laparotomies performed. The decrease in average costs and charges is projected to result in savings of $2.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Conclusions: The use of DCL was significantly decreased by 78{\%} during the study with significantly improved outcome. The improved outcome and decreased resource utilization can reduce health care costs and charges. Although DCL may be a vital aspect of trauma surgery, it can be used more selectively with improved outcome.",
keywords = "Abdominal compartment syndrome, Bleeding, Cost, Damage control, Laparotomy, Mortality, Resuscitation, Shock, Surgery, Trauma",
author = "Guillermo Higa and Friese, {Randall S} and Okeeffe, {Terence S} and Julie Wynne and Paul Bowlby and Michelle Ziemba and Latifi, {Rifat -} and Narong Kulvatunyou and Rhee, {Peter M}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e293b4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "53--59",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Damage control laparotomy

T2 - A vital tool once overused

AU - Higa, Guillermo

AU - Friese, Randall S

AU - Okeeffe, Terence S

AU - Wynne, Julie

AU - Bowlby, Paul

AU - Ziemba, Michelle

AU - Latifi, Rifat -

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Rhee, Peter M

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Background: Trauma surgery is in constant evolution as is the use of damage control laparotomy (DCL). The purpose of this study was to report the change in usage of DCL over time and its effect on outcome. Methods: Trauma patients requiring laparotomies during a 3-year (2006-2008) period were reviewed. DCL was defined as laparotomy when fascia was not closed at the first operation. Results: There were 14,534 trauma patients evaluated, and 843 laparotomies were performed on 532 patients during the study period. The number of patients requiring open laparotomies slightly increased while the demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar during the study period. The number of patient requiring DCL significantly decreased from 36.3% (53 of 146) in 2006 to 8.8% (15 of 170) in 2008 (p < 0.001). During this same time period, the mortality rate for patients requiring open laparotomy significantly decreased from 21.9% in 2006 to 12.9% in 2008 (p = 0.05). The decreased use of DCL resulted in a 33.3% reduction in the number of laparotomies performed. The decrease in average costs and charges is projected to result in savings of $2.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Conclusions: The use of DCL was significantly decreased by 78% during the study with significantly improved outcome. The improved outcome and decreased resource utilization can reduce health care costs and charges. Although DCL may be a vital aspect of trauma surgery, it can be used more selectively with improved outcome.

AB - Background: Trauma surgery is in constant evolution as is the use of damage control laparotomy (DCL). The purpose of this study was to report the change in usage of DCL over time and its effect on outcome. Methods: Trauma patients requiring laparotomies during a 3-year (2006-2008) period were reviewed. DCL was defined as laparotomy when fascia was not closed at the first operation. Results: There were 14,534 trauma patients evaluated, and 843 laparotomies were performed on 532 patients during the study period. The number of patients requiring open laparotomies slightly increased while the demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar during the study period. The number of patient requiring DCL significantly decreased from 36.3% (53 of 146) in 2006 to 8.8% (15 of 170) in 2008 (p < 0.001). During this same time period, the mortality rate for patients requiring open laparotomy significantly decreased from 21.9% in 2006 to 12.9% in 2008 (p = 0.05). The decreased use of DCL resulted in a 33.3% reduction in the number of laparotomies performed. The decrease in average costs and charges is projected to result in savings of $2.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Conclusions: The use of DCL was significantly decreased by 78% during the study with significantly improved outcome. The improved outcome and decreased resource utilization can reduce health care costs and charges. Although DCL may be a vital aspect of trauma surgery, it can be used more selectively with improved outcome.

KW - Abdominal compartment syndrome

KW - Bleeding

KW - Cost

KW - Damage control

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Mortality

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Shock

KW - Surgery

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954707979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954707979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e293b4

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e293b4

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -