Danger beyond dyads: Third-party participants in militarized interstate disputes

Renato Corbetta, William J Dixon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stuart Bremer often reminded us that third parties - directly or indirectly - affect the initiation, evolution, and termination of conflict. He encouraged scholars to research the phenomenon of joining behavior further and personally investigated it. Questions about joining behavior are indeed deeply intertwined with a variety of theories of conflict. However, existing records on third-party interventions are limited to states' military involvement in conflict. The limitations imposed by the data can lead researchers to biased or incomplete conclusions about many international phenomena. We heed Bremer's encouragement and present here the results of an effort to collect new evidence on nonneutral (partisan) interventions in militarized interstate disputes for the 1946-2001 period. The data we present differ from existing records in that: (1) they provide information on both third parties' military and nonmilitary activities; (2) they broaden the notion of what constitutes a third party by including coalitions of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs); (3) they expand the investigation framework by recording interventions that occur before and after a militarized dispute. We test the usefulness of the data by exploring the issue of major powers' interventions in conflicts, as Yamamoto and Bremer did in their 1980 "Wider Wars and Restless Nights" article. We offer strong support for Yamamoto and Bremer's finding that major powers drag one another into ongoing conflicts and show how the data may help us raise and answer new and more complex hypotheses about third parties and the dynamics of joining behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-61
Number of pages23
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

dyad
Military
non-governmental organization
recording
coalition
Militarized interstate disputes
Dyads
evidence

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Intervention
  • Joining
  • Major powers
  • Third parties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Danger beyond dyads : Third-party participants in militarized interstate disputes. / Corbetta, Renato; Dixon, William J.

In: Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2005, p. 39-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6cf01114e6f48dfade5c98233924de8,
title = "Danger beyond dyads: Third-party participants in militarized interstate disputes",
abstract = "Stuart Bremer often reminded us that third parties - directly or indirectly - affect the initiation, evolution, and termination of conflict. He encouraged scholars to research the phenomenon of joining behavior further and personally investigated it. Questions about joining behavior are indeed deeply intertwined with a variety of theories of conflict. However, existing records on third-party interventions are limited to states' military involvement in conflict. The limitations imposed by the data can lead researchers to biased or incomplete conclusions about many international phenomena. We heed Bremer's encouragement and present here the results of an effort to collect new evidence on nonneutral (partisan) interventions in militarized interstate disputes for the 1946-2001 period. The data we present differ from existing records in that: (1) they provide information on both third parties' military and nonmilitary activities; (2) they broaden the notion of what constitutes a third party by including coalitions of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs); (3) they expand the investigation framework by recording interventions that occur before and after a militarized dispute. We test the usefulness of the data by exploring the issue of major powers' interventions in conflicts, as Yamamoto and Bremer did in their 1980 {"}Wider Wars and Restless Nights{"} article. We offer strong support for Yamamoto and Bremer's finding that major powers drag one another into ongoing conflicts and show how the data may help us raise and answer new and more complex hypotheses about third parties and the dynamics of joining behavior.",
keywords = "Conflict, Intervention, Joining, Major powers, Third parties",
author = "Renato Corbetta and Dixon, {William J}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/07388940590915318",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "39--61",
journal = "Conflict Management and Peace Science",
issn = "0738-8942",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Danger beyond dyads

T2 - Third-party participants in militarized interstate disputes

AU - Corbetta, Renato

AU - Dixon, William J

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Stuart Bremer often reminded us that third parties - directly or indirectly - affect the initiation, evolution, and termination of conflict. He encouraged scholars to research the phenomenon of joining behavior further and personally investigated it. Questions about joining behavior are indeed deeply intertwined with a variety of theories of conflict. However, existing records on third-party interventions are limited to states' military involvement in conflict. The limitations imposed by the data can lead researchers to biased or incomplete conclusions about many international phenomena. We heed Bremer's encouragement and present here the results of an effort to collect new evidence on nonneutral (partisan) interventions in militarized interstate disputes for the 1946-2001 period. The data we present differ from existing records in that: (1) they provide information on both third parties' military and nonmilitary activities; (2) they broaden the notion of what constitutes a third party by including coalitions of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs); (3) they expand the investigation framework by recording interventions that occur before and after a militarized dispute. We test the usefulness of the data by exploring the issue of major powers' interventions in conflicts, as Yamamoto and Bremer did in their 1980 "Wider Wars and Restless Nights" article. We offer strong support for Yamamoto and Bremer's finding that major powers drag one another into ongoing conflicts and show how the data may help us raise and answer new and more complex hypotheses about third parties and the dynamics of joining behavior.

AB - Stuart Bremer often reminded us that third parties - directly or indirectly - affect the initiation, evolution, and termination of conflict. He encouraged scholars to research the phenomenon of joining behavior further and personally investigated it. Questions about joining behavior are indeed deeply intertwined with a variety of theories of conflict. However, existing records on third-party interventions are limited to states' military involvement in conflict. The limitations imposed by the data can lead researchers to biased or incomplete conclusions about many international phenomena. We heed Bremer's encouragement and present here the results of an effort to collect new evidence on nonneutral (partisan) interventions in militarized interstate disputes for the 1946-2001 period. The data we present differ from existing records in that: (1) they provide information on both third parties' military and nonmilitary activities; (2) they broaden the notion of what constitutes a third party by including coalitions of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs); (3) they expand the investigation framework by recording interventions that occur before and after a militarized dispute. We test the usefulness of the data by exploring the issue of major powers' interventions in conflicts, as Yamamoto and Bremer did in their 1980 "Wider Wars and Restless Nights" article. We offer strong support for Yamamoto and Bremer's finding that major powers drag one another into ongoing conflicts and show how the data may help us raise and answer new and more complex hypotheses about third parties and the dynamics of joining behavior.

KW - Conflict

KW - Intervention

KW - Joining

KW - Major powers

KW - Third parties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944501016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944501016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07388940590915318

DO - 10.1080/07388940590915318

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27944501016

VL - 22

SP - 39

EP - 61

JO - Conflict Management and Peace Science

JF - Conflict Management and Peace Science

SN - 0738-8942

IS - 1

ER -