Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear

(Dark Energy Survey Collaboration)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use 26×106 galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape catalogs over 1321 deg2 of the sky to produce the most significant measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain cosmological parameters in both the flat ΛCDM and the wCDM models, while also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust using two independent shape catalogs, two independent photo-z calibration methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a 3.5% fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.782-0.027+0.027 at 68% C.L., which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In wCDM, we find a 4.8% fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.777-0.038+0.036 and a dark energy equation-of-state w=-0.95-0.39+0.33. We find results that are consistent with previous cosmic shear constraints in σ8 - Ωm, and we see no evidence for disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the cosmic microwave background. Finally, we find no evidence preferring a wCDM model allowing w≠-1. We expect further significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective integrated exposure time per galaxy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number043528
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2018

Fingerprint

dark energy
shear
catalogs
galaxies
sky
equations of state
neutrinos
microwaves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results : Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear. / (Dark Energy Survey Collaboration).

In: Physical Review D, Vol. 98, No. 4, 043528, 15.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

(Dark Energy Survey Collaboration). / Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results : Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear. In: Physical Review D. 2018 ; Vol. 98, No. 4.
@article{dc6797b0a786464fb4b0a4e201c94064,
title = "Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear",
abstract = "We use 26×106 galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape catalogs over 1321 deg2 of the sky to produce the most significant measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain cosmological parameters in both the flat ΛCDM and the wCDM models, while also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust using two independent shape catalogs, two independent photo-z calibration methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a 3.5{\%} fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.782-0.027+0.027 at 68{\%} C.L., which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In wCDM, we find a 4.8{\%} fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.777-0.038+0.036 and a dark energy equation-of-state w=-0.95-0.39+0.33. We find results that are consistent with previous cosmic shear constraints in σ8 - Ωm, and we see no evidence for disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the cosmic microwave background. Finally, we find no evidence preferring a wCDM model allowing w≠-1. We expect further significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective integrated exposure time per galaxy.",
author = "{(Dark Energy Survey Collaboration)} and Troxel, {M. A.} and N. Maccrann and J. Zuntz and Eifler, {T. F.} and E. Krause and S. Dodelson and D. Gruen and J. Blazek and O. Friedrich and S. Samuroff and J. Prat and Secco, {L. F.} and C. Davis and A. Fert{\'e} and J. Derose and A. Alarcon and A. Amara and E. Baxter and Becker, {M. R.} and Bernstein, {G. M.} and Bridle, {S. L.} and R. Cawthon and C. Chang and A. Choi and {De Vicente}, J. and A. Drlica-Wagner and J. Elvin-Poole and J. Frieman and M. Gatti and Hartley, {W. G.} and K. Honscheid and B. Hoyle and Huff, {E. M.} and D. Huterer and B. Jain and M. Jarvis and T. Kacprzak and D. Kirk and N. Kokron and C. Krawiec and O. Lahav and Liddle, {A. R.} and J. Peacock and Rau, {M. M.} and A. Refregier and Rollins, {R. P.} and Eduardo Rozo and Rykoff, {E. S.} and C. S{\'a}nchez and I. Sevilla-Noarbe",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
journal = "Physical Review D",
issn = "2470-0010",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results

T2 - Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear

AU - (Dark Energy Survey Collaboration)

AU - Troxel, M. A.

AU - Maccrann, N.

AU - Zuntz, J.

AU - Eifler, T. F.

AU - Krause, E.

AU - Dodelson, S.

AU - Gruen, D.

AU - Blazek, J.

AU - Friedrich, O.

AU - Samuroff, S.

AU - Prat, J.

AU - Secco, L. F.

AU - Davis, C.

AU - Ferté, A.

AU - Derose, J.

AU - Alarcon, A.

AU - Amara, A.

AU - Baxter, E.

AU - Becker, M. R.

AU - Bernstein, G. M.

AU - Bridle, S. L.

AU - Cawthon, R.

AU - Chang, C.

AU - Choi, A.

AU - De Vicente, J.

AU - Drlica-Wagner, A.

AU - Elvin-Poole, J.

AU - Frieman, J.

AU - Gatti, M.

AU - Hartley, W. G.

AU - Honscheid, K.

AU - Hoyle, B.

AU - Huff, E. M.

AU - Huterer, D.

AU - Jain, B.

AU - Jarvis, M.

AU - Kacprzak, T.

AU - Kirk, D.

AU - Kokron, N.

AU - Krawiec, C.

AU - Lahav, O.

AU - Liddle, A. R.

AU - Peacock, J.

AU - Rau, M. M.

AU - Refregier, A.

AU - Rollins, R. P.

AU - Rozo, Eduardo

AU - Rykoff, E. S.

AU - Sánchez, C.

AU - Sevilla-Noarbe, I.

PY - 2018/8/15

Y1 - 2018/8/15

N2 - We use 26×106 galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape catalogs over 1321 deg2 of the sky to produce the most significant measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain cosmological parameters in both the flat ΛCDM and the wCDM models, while also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust using two independent shape catalogs, two independent photo-z calibration methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a 3.5% fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.782-0.027+0.027 at 68% C.L., which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In wCDM, we find a 4.8% fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.777-0.038+0.036 and a dark energy equation-of-state w=-0.95-0.39+0.33. We find results that are consistent with previous cosmic shear constraints in σ8 - Ωm, and we see no evidence for disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the cosmic microwave background. Finally, we find no evidence preferring a wCDM model allowing w≠-1. We expect further significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective integrated exposure time per galaxy.

AB - We use 26×106 galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape catalogs over 1321 deg2 of the sky to produce the most significant measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain cosmological parameters in both the flat ΛCDM and the wCDM models, while also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust using two independent shape catalogs, two independent photo-z calibration methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a 3.5% fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.782-0.027+0.027 at 68% C.L., which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In wCDM, we find a 4.8% fractional uncertainty on σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.777-0.038+0.036 and a dark energy equation-of-state w=-0.95-0.39+0.33. We find results that are consistent with previous cosmic shear constraints in σ8 - Ωm, and we see no evidence for disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the cosmic microwave background. Finally, we find no evidence preferring a wCDM model allowing w≠-1. We expect further significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective integrated exposure time per galaxy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052612659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052612659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052612659

VL - 98

JO - Physical Review D

JF - Physical Review D

SN - 2470-0010

IS - 4

M1 - 043528

ER -