Decision-Making for Patients With Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts to Left Anterior Descending

Sreekumar - Subramanian, Joseph F. Sabik, Penny L. Houghtaling, Edward R. Nowicki, Eugene H. Blackstone, Bruce W. Lytle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is unknown whether coronary reintervention confers a survival advantage when a previously placed left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) is patent. We compared survival after medical therapy, percutaneous intervention, and reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting in such patients who developed non-LAD territory jeopardy. Methods: From 1971 to 2000, 4,640 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting that included left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafting were found on angiography during active follow-up to have a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft, but at least 50% stenosis of non-LAD territories or grafts to them. Two survival analyses were performed: (1) intent-to-treat, which included patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 731) or percutaneous intervention (n = 994) within 6 weeks of angiography or medical management (n = 2,782), and (2) competing risk/crossover, in which patients were classified as medically managed until crossover to coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous intervention. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis, propensity-adjusted early (<1 year) survival was similar for all patients, but late survival was slightly better after percutaneous intervention than with medical management (p ≤ 0.05). In the competing risk/crossover analysis, adjusted survival was best for medically treated patients early; however, late survival was similar among all three groups. Conclusions: Patients with patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafts who develop non-LAD territory jeopardy derive no survival benefit from reintervention, consistent with previous observations that for coronary reintervention to improve survival, the LAD territory must be jeopardized. Reintervention in patients with a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft may be warranted to relieve symptoms, without expecting a survival benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1392-1400
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume87
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mammary Arteries
Decision Making
Transplants
Survival
Coronary Artery Bypass
Angiography
Survival Analysis
Coronary Vessels
Pathologic Constriction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Decision-Making for Patients With Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts to Left Anterior Descending. / Subramanian, Sreekumar -; Sabik, Joseph F.; Houghtaling, Penny L.; Nowicki, Edward R.; Blackstone, Eugene H.; Lytle, Bruce W.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 87, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 1392-1400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Subramanian, Sreekumar - ; Sabik, Joseph F. ; Houghtaling, Penny L. ; Nowicki, Edward R. ; Blackstone, Eugene H. ; Lytle, Bruce W. / Decision-Making for Patients With Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts to Left Anterior Descending. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 87, No. 5. pp. 1392-1400.
@article{9bb330060a6d44b69f2457a0b6349ac3,
title = "Decision-Making for Patients With Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts to Left Anterior Descending",
abstract = "Background: It is unknown whether coronary reintervention confers a survival advantage when a previously placed left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) is patent. We compared survival after medical therapy, percutaneous intervention, and reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting in such patients who developed non-LAD territory jeopardy. Methods: From 1971 to 2000, 4,640 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting that included left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafting were found on angiography during active follow-up to have a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft, but at least 50{\%} stenosis of non-LAD territories or grafts to them. Two survival analyses were performed: (1) intent-to-treat, which included patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 731) or percutaneous intervention (n = 994) within 6 weeks of angiography or medical management (n = 2,782), and (2) competing risk/crossover, in which patients were classified as medically managed until crossover to coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous intervention. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis, propensity-adjusted early (<1 year) survival was similar for all patients, but late survival was slightly better after percutaneous intervention than with medical management (p ≤ 0.05). In the competing risk/crossover analysis, adjusted survival was best for medically treated patients early; however, late survival was similar among all three groups. Conclusions: Patients with patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafts who develop non-LAD territory jeopardy derive no survival benefit from reintervention, consistent with previous observations that for coronary reintervention to improve survival, the LAD territory must be jeopardized. Reintervention in patients with a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft may be warranted to relieve symptoms, without expecting a survival benefit.",
author = "Subramanian, {Sreekumar -} and Sabik, {Joseph F.} and Houghtaling, {Penny L.} and Nowicki, {Edward R.} and Blackstone, {Eugene H.} and Lytle, {Bruce W.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "1392--1400",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision-Making for Patients With Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts to Left Anterior Descending

AU - Subramanian, Sreekumar -

AU - Sabik, Joseph F.

AU - Houghtaling, Penny L.

AU - Nowicki, Edward R.

AU - Blackstone, Eugene H.

AU - Lytle, Bruce W.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Background: It is unknown whether coronary reintervention confers a survival advantage when a previously placed left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) is patent. We compared survival after medical therapy, percutaneous intervention, and reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting in such patients who developed non-LAD territory jeopardy. Methods: From 1971 to 2000, 4,640 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting that included left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafting were found on angiography during active follow-up to have a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft, but at least 50% stenosis of non-LAD territories or grafts to them. Two survival analyses were performed: (1) intent-to-treat, which included patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 731) or percutaneous intervention (n = 994) within 6 weeks of angiography or medical management (n = 2,782), and (2) competing risk/crossover, in which patients were classified as medically managed until crossover to coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous intervention. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis, propensity-adjusted early (<1 year) survival was similar for all patients, but late survival was slightly better after percutaneous intervention than with medical management (p ≤ 0.05). In the competing risk/crossover analysis, adjusted survival was best for medically treated patients early; however, late survival was similar among all three groups. Conclusions: Patients with patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafts who develop non-LAD territory jeopardy derive no survival benefit from reintervention, consistent with previous observations that for coronary reintervention to improve survival, the LAD territory must be jeopardized. Reintervention in patients with a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft may be warranted to relieve symptoms, without expecting a survival benefit.

AB - Background: It is unknown whether coronary reintervention confers a survival advantage when a previously placed left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) is patent. We compared survival after medical therapy, percutaneous intervention, and reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting in such patients who developed non-LAD territory jeopardy. Methods: From 1971 to 2000, 4,640 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting that included left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafting were found on angiography during active follow-up to have a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft, but at least 50% stenosis of non-LAD territories or grafts to them. Two survival analyses were performed: (1) intent-to-treat, which included patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 731) or percutaneous intervention (n = 994) within 6 weeks of angiography or medical management (n = 2,782), and (2) competing risk/crossover, in which patients were classified as medically managed until crossover to coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous intervention. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis, propensity-adjusted early (<1 year) survival was similar for all patients, but late survival was slightly better after percutaneous intervention than with medical management (p ≤ 0.05). In the competing risk/crossover analysis, adjusted survival was best for medically treated patients early; however, late survival was similar among all three groups. Conclusions: Patients with patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD grafts who develop non-LAD territory jeopardy derive no survival benefit from reintervention, consistent with previous observations that for coronary reintervention to improve survival, the LAD territory must be jeopardized. Reintervention in patients with a patent left internal thoracic artery to LAD graft may be warranted to relieve symptoms, without expecting a survival benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64649094364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64649094364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.032

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.032

M3 - Article

C2 - 19379872

AN - SCOPUS:64649094364

VL - 87

SP - 1392

EP - 1400

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 5

ER -