Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks

Terence Connolly, Doug Dean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine decision analysis' central "decomposition principle" in the context of work-time estimates of software writers. Two experiments examined the abilities of advanced programming students to estimate how long they would take to complete specific software projects. They estimated their own work times both for entire projects and for their constituent subtasks. Estimates showed varying degrees of overoptimism and overpessimism but all were much too tight, with almost half of actual outcomes falling in the 1 % tails of estimated distributions. This overtightness was unaffected by task decomposition, question wording, question order, or training in estimation. It was, however, significantly reduced by a procedure aimed at inducing generous upper and lower plausible limits. An underlying model of incomplete search is used to connect these findings to existing themes in cognition and judgment research, as well as to practical application. The findings suggest that the best level of decomposition at which to elicit work-time estimates may depend on task, judge, and elicitation method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1029-1045
Number of pages17
JournalManagement Science
Volume43
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1997
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Decomposition
  • Interval Estimation
  • Overconfidence
  • Overoptimism; Aggregation
  • Software Estimating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this