Defending conversation and responsibility: reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, I defend the central arguments of my book Conversation and Responsibility in response to two critics, Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-84
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume171
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Blameworthiness
  • Conversation
  • Holding morally responsible
  • Meaning
  • Moral responsibility
  • Praiseworthiness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Defending conversation and responsibility: reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this