Defensive reactions of “wild‐type” and “Domesticated” wild rats to approach and contact by a threat stimulus

D. Caroline Blanchard, Nina K. Popova, Irina Z. Plyusnina, Irina L. Velichko, Desiree Campbell, Robert J. Blanchard, Julia Nikulina, Ella M Nikulina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selective breeding of wild rats over many generations on the basis of low or high defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact has produced highly polarized “domesticated” and “wild‐type” animals. Because the selection procedure selectively involves these two defense patterns, and these clearly differ in the two groups, it is of interest to determine if other, nonselected, defensive behaviors to threat stimuli also change. “Domesticated” and “wild‐type” rats of the thirty‐fifth generation were run in a fear defense test battery (F/DTB) to systematically evaluate defensive behaviors to a variety of present threat stimuli. “Domesticated” rats showed reduced avoidance and slower flight speed to an approaching experimenter, reduced jump/startle response to handelap and dorsal contact, less vocalization and boxing to vibrissae stimulation or to an anesthetized conspecific, and reduced defensiveness to an attempted pickup by the experimenter. These results indicate that selective bi‐directional breeding for defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact produces group differences in a variety of defensive behaviors, and in defensiveness to stimuli other than those on which the selection was based. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-397
Number of pages11
JournalAggressive Behavior
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Startle Reflex
Boxing
Vibrissae
Domestic Animals
Fear
Stimulus
Rat
Threat
Selective Breeding
Experimenter
Attack
Breeding
Animals
Stimulation
Group Differences
Vocalization
Avoidance
Flight
Battery
Jump

Keywords

  • defense
  • defensive attack
  • defensive behavior
  • defensive threat
  • domestication
  • fear defense test battery
  • freezing
  • genetic selection
  • rats
  • wild‐type rats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Defensive reactions of “wild‐type” and “Domesticated” wild rats to approach and contact by a threat stimulus. / Blanchard, D. Caroline; Popova, Nina K.; Plyusnina, Irina Z.; Velichko, Irina L.; Campbell, Desiree; Blanchard, Robert J.; Nikulina, Julia; Nikulina, Ella M.

In: Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 20, No. 5, 1994, p. 387-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanchard, D. Caroline ; Popova, Nina K. ; Plyusnina, Irina Z. ; Velichko, Irina L. ; Campbell, Desiree ; Blanchard, Robert J. ; Nikulina, Julia ; Nikulina, Ella M. / Defensive reactions of “wild‐type” and “Domesticated” wild rats to approach and contact by a threat stimulus. In: Aggressive Behavior. 1994 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 387-397.
@article{91a9cafadf7c4229a571ba591734ef6c,
title = "Defensive reactions of “wild‐type” and “Domesticated” wild rats to approach and contact by a threat stimulus",
abstract = "Selective breeding of wild rats over many generations on the basis of low or high defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact has produced highly polarized “domesticated” and “wild‐type” animals. Because the selection procedure selectively involves these two defense patterns, and these clearly differ in the two groups, it is of interest to determine if other, nonselected, defensive behaviors to threat stimuli also change. “Domesticated” and “wild‐type” rats of the thirty‐fifth generation were run in a fear defense test battery (F/DTB) to systematically evaluate defensive behaviors to a variety of present threat stimuli. “Domesticated” rats showed reduced avoidance and slower flight speed to an approaching experimenter, reduced jump/startle response to handelap and dorsal contact, less vocalization and boxing to vibrissae stimulation or to an anesthetized conspecific, and reduced defensiveness to an attempted pickup by the experimenter. These results indicate that selective bi‐directional breeding for defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact produces group differences in a variety of defensive behaviors, and in defensiveness to stimuli other than those on which the selection was based. {\circledC} 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.",
keywords = "defense, defensive attack, defensive behavior, defensive threat, domestication, fear defense test battery, freezing, genetic selection, rats, wild‐type rats",
author = "Blanchard, {D. Caroline} and Popova, {Nina K.} and Plyusnina, {Irina Z.} and Velichko, {Irina L.} and Desiree Campbell and Blanchard, {Robert J.} and Julia Nikulina and Nikulina, {Ella M}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:5<387::AID-AB2480200506>3.0.CO;2-D",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "387--397",
journal = "Aggressive Behavior",
issn = "0096-140X",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defensive reactions of “wild‐type” and “Domesticated” wild rats to approach and contact by a threat stimulus

AU - Blanchard, D. Caroline

AU - Popova, Nina K.

AU - Plyusnina, Irina Z.

AU - Velichko, Irina L.

AU - Campbell, Desiree

AU - Blanchard, Robert J.

AU - Nikulina, Julia

AU - Nikulina, Ella M

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Selective breeding of wild rats over many generations on the basis of low or high defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact has produced highly polarized “domesticated” and “wild‐type” animals. Because the selection procedure selectively involves these two defense patterns, and these clearly differ in the two groups, it is of interest to determine if other, nonselected, defensive behaviors to threat stimuli also change. “Domesticated” and “wild‐type” rats of the thirty‐fifth generation were run in a fear defense test battery (F/DTB) to systematically evaluate defensive behaviors to a variety of present threat stimuli. “Domesticated” rats showed reduced avoidance and slower flight speed to an approaching experimenter, reduced jump/startle response to handelap and dorsal contact, less vocalization and boxing to vibrissae stimulation or to an anesthetized conspecific, and reduced defensiveness to an attempted pickup by the experimenter. These results indicate that selective bi‐directional breeding for defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact produces group differences in a variety of defensive behaviors, and in defensiveness to stimuli other than those on which the selection was based. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

AB - Selective breeding of wild rats over many generations on the basis of low or high defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact has produced highly polarized “domesticated” and “wild‐type” animals. Because the selection procedure selectively involves these two defense patterns, and these clearly differ in the two groups, it is of interest to determine if other, nonselected, defensive behaviors to threat stimuli also change. “Domesticated” and “wild‐type” rats of the thirty‐fifth generation were run in a fear defense test battery (F/DTB) to systematically evaluate defensive behaviors to a variety of present threat stimuli. “Domesticated” rats showed reduced avoidance and slower flight speed to an approaching experimenter, reduced jump/startle response to handelap and dorsal contact, less vocalization and boxing to vibrissae stimulation or to an anesthetized conspecific, and reduced defensiveness to an attempted pickup by the experimenter. These results indicate that selective bi‐directional breeding for defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact produces group differences in a variety of defensive behaviors, and in defensiveness to stimuli other than those on which the selection was based. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

KW - defense

KW - defensive attack

KW - defensive behavior

KW - defensive threat

KW - domestication

KW - fear defense test battery

KW - freezing

KW - genetic selection

KW - rats

KW - wild‐type rats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981861152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981861152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:5<387::AID-AB2480200506>3.0.CO;2-D

DO - 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:5<387::AID-AB2480200506>3.0.CO;2-D

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 387

EP - 397

JO - Aggressive Behavior

JF - Aggressive Behavior

SN - 0096-140X

IS - 5

ER -