Defining states

Reconsiderations and recommendations

Stuart A. Bremer, Faten Yasser Halawi-Ghosn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on the definition of states-an issue that has been a central concern for the Correlates of War Project in particular and international relations in general. The paper argues that we need to move away from the crude dichotomous conceptualization of state system membership, which is far too simple and rigid, to the conceptualization of state membership as a continuous attribute. Two underlying dimensions of stateness are suggested. The first refers to the internal organization of the geopolitical units (GPUs) and focuses on the size, autonomy and cohesion (SAC Index) of the GPU, while the second reflects the way in which a GPU relates to other GPUs and concentrates on interdependence, interaction and recognition (IIR Index). Conceptualizing "stateness" in this way represents a richer and more sophisticated theoretical approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-41
Number of pages21
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Volume20
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

group cohesion
interdependence
international relations
autonomy
organization
interaction
Conceptualization
Autonomy
Interaction
Cohesion
Interdependence
Internal organization
Correlates
International relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Defining states : Reconsiderations and recommendations. / Bremer, Stuart A.; Halawi-Ghosn, Faten Yasser.

In: Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, 03.2003, p. 21-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{349775416da14eb4b3270b8f521b0481,
title = "Defining states: Reconsiderations and recommendations",
abstract = "This article focuses on the definition of states-an issue that has been a central concern for the Correlates of War Project in particular and international relations in general. The paper argues that we need to move away from the crude dichotomous conceptualization of state system membership, which is far too simple and rigid, to the conceptualization of state membership as a continuous attribute. Two underlying dimensions of stateness are suggested. The first refers to the internal organization of the geopolitical units (GPUs) and focuses on the size, autonomy and cohesion (SAC Index) of the GPU, while the second reflects the way in which a GPU relates to other GPUs and concentrates on interdependence, interaction and recognition (IIR Index). Conceptualizing {"}stateness{"} in this way represents a richer and more sophisticated theoretical approach.",
author = "Bremer, {Stuart A.} and Halawi-Ghosn, {Faten Yasser}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "21--41",
journal = "Conflict Management and Peace Science",
issn = "0738-8942",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining states

T2 - Reconsiderations and recommendations

AU - Bremer, Stuart A.

AU - Halawi-Ghosn, Faten Yasser

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - This article focuses on the definition of states-an issue that has been a central concern for the Correlates of War Project in particular and international relations in general. The paper argues that we need to move away from the crude dichotomous conceptualization of state system membership, which is far too simple and rigid, to the conceptualization of state membership as a continuous attribute. Two underlying dimensions of stateness are suggested. The first refers to the internal organization of the geopolitical units (GPUs) and focuses on the size, autonomy and cohesion (SAC Index) of the GPU, while the second reflects the way in which a GPU relates to other GPUs and concentrates on interdependence, interaction and recognition (IIR Index). Conceptualizing "stateness" in this way represents a richer and more sophisticated theoretical approach.

AB - This article focuses on the definition of states-an issue that has been a central concern for the Correlates of War Project in particular and international relations in general. The paper argues that we need to move away from the crude dichotomous conceptualization of state system membership, which is far too simple and rigid, to the conceptualization of state membership as a continuous attribute. Two underlying dimensions of stateness are suggested. The first refers to the internal organization of the geopolitical units (GPUs) and focuses on the size, autonomy and cohesion (SAC Index) of the GPU, while the second reflects the way in which a GPU relates to other GPUs and concentrates on interdependence, interaction and recognition (IIR Index). Conceptualizing "stateness" in this way represents a richer and more sophisticated theoretical approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037745570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037745570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 21

EP - 41

JO - Conflict Management and Peace Science

JF - Conflict Management and Peace Science

SN - 0738-8942

IS - 1

ER -