Depression, self-focused attention, and the self-serving attributional bias

Jeff L Greenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, John Burling, Karyn Tibbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research suggests that nondepressed and depressed individuals differ in their attributions for success and failure: whereas nondepressed individuals exhibit more internal attributions for success than for failure (the self-serving bias), this bias is attentuated for depressed individuals. It has also been found that whereas nondepressed individuals prefer self-focus after success to self-focus after failure, depressed individuals prefer self-focus after failure to self-focus after success (i.e. they exhibit a depressive self-focusing style). Pyszczynski and Greenberg [(1987a) Coping with negative life events: Clinical and social psychological perspectives. New York: Academic Press; (1987b) Psychological Bulletin, 102, 122-138] have proposed that this depressive self-focusing style accounts for the lack of a self-serving attributional bias in depressed persons. To test this idea, depressed and nondepressed subjects were led to experience a success or failure. These subjects were then led to focus either internally or externally, in order to create conditions that simulate either the depressive or nondepressive pattern of attentional focus following performance outcomes. As predicted, conditions analogous to the depressive self-focusing style led to the typical depressed pattern of outcome attributions; in contrast, conditions analogous to the nondepressive pattern of attentional focus led to a self-serving attributional bias for all subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)959-965
Number of pages7
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Psychology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Depression, self-focused attention, and the self-serving attributional bias. / Greenberg, Jeff L; Pyszczynski, Tom; Burling, John; Tibbs, Karyn.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, No. 9, 1992, p. 959-965.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenberg, Jeff L ; Pyszczynski, Tom ; Burling, John ; Tibbs, Karyn. / Depression, self-focused attention, and the self-serving attributional bias. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 1992 ; Vol. 13, No. 9. pp. 959-965.
@article{44644f27560f421085ed8c6544465c4c,
title = "Depression, self-focused attention, and the self-serving attributional bias",
abstract = "Research suggests that nondepressed and depressed individuals differ in their attributions for success and failure: whereas nondepressed individuals exhibit more internal attributions for success than for failure (the self-serving bias), this bias is attentuated for depressed individuals. It has also been found that whereas nondepressed individuals prefer self-focus after success to self-focus after failure, depressed individuals prefer self-focus after failure to self-focus after success (i.e. they exhibit a depressive self-focusing style). Pyszczynski and Greenberg [(1987a) Coping with negative life events: Clinical and social psychological perspectives. New York: Academic Press; (1987b) Psychological Bulletin, 102, 122-138] have proposed that this depressive self-focusing style accounts for the lack of a self-serving attributional bias in depressed persons. To test this idea, depressed and nondepressed subjects were led to experience a success or failure. These subjects were then led to focus either internally or externally, in order to create conditions that simulate either the depressive or nondepressive pattern of attentional focus following performance outcomes. As predicted, conditions analogous to the depressive self-focusing style led to the typical depressed pattern of outcome attributions; in contrast, conditions analogous to the nondepressive pattern of attentional focus led to a self-serving attributional bias for all subjects.",
author = "Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Tom Pyszczynski and John Burling and Karyn Tibbs",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0191-8869(92)90129-D",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "959--965",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depression, self-focused attention, and the self-serving attributional bias

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Pyszczynski, Tom

AU - Burling, John

AU - Tibbs, Karyn

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Research suggests that nondepressed and depressed individuals differ in their attributions for success and failure: whereas nondepressed individuals exhibit more internal attributions for success than for failure (the self-serving bias), this bias is attentuated for depressed individuals. It has also been found that whereas nondepressed individuals prefer self-focus after success to self-focus after failure, depressed individuals prefer self-focus after failure to self-focus after success (i.e. they exhibit a depressive self-focusing style). Pyszczynski and Greenberg [(1987a) Coping with negative life events: Clinical and social psychological perspectives. New York: Academic Press; (1987b) Psychological Bulletin, 102, 122-138] have proposed that this depressive self-focusing style accounts for the lack of a self-serving attributional bias in depressed persons. To test this idea, depressed and nondepressed subjects were led to experience a success or failure. These subjects were then led to focus either internally or externally, in order to create conditions that simulate either the depressive or nondepressive pattern of attentional focus following performance outcomes. As predicted, conditions analogous to the depressive self-focusing style led to the typical depressed pattern of outcome attributions; in contrast, conditions analogous to the nondepressive pattern of attentional focus led to a self-serving attributional bias for all subjects.

AB - Research suggests that nondepressed and depressed individuals differ in their attributions for success and failure: whereas nondepressed individuals exhibit more internal attributions for success than for failure (the self-serving bias), this bias is attentuated for depressed individuals. It has also been found that whereas nondepressed individuals prefer self-focus after success to self-focus after failure, depressed individuals prefer self-focus after failure to self-focus after success (i.e. they exhibit a depressive self-focusing style). Pyszczynski and Greenberg [(1987a) Coping with negative life events: Clinical and social psychological perspectives. New York: Academic Press; (1987b) Psychological Bulletin, 102, 122-138] have proposed that this depressive self-focusing style accounts for the lack of a self-serving attributional bias in depressed persons. To test this idea, depressed and nondepressed subjects were led to experience a success or failure. These subjects were then led to focus either internally or externally, in order to create conditions that simulate either the depressive or nondepressive pattern of attentional focus following performance outcomes. As predicted, conditions analogous to the depressive self-focusing style led to the typical depressed pattern of outcome attributions; in contrast, conditions analogous to the nondepressive pattern of attentional focus led to a self-serving attributional bias for all subjects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249008811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249008811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90129-D

DO - 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90129-D

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 959

EP - 965

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 9

ER -