Detecting signals of unexpected or uncertain durations

Huanping Dai, B. A. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Expectation of signal duration influences the signal detectability. This is demonstrated in two experiments in which percent correct was measured for both tonal and noise signals whose durations were either unexpected or uncertain. In both experiments, the signal at each duration was set to have a d' of about 1.5 when that duration was presented alone and expected. When the six subjects were led to expect a short- or a long-duration signal using the probe-signal method, the detectability of signals decreased to near chance as the signal duration deviated from the expected value (experiment 1). When the subjects were led to expect a range of durations, the detectability was only slightly worse than when each signal was presented alone (experiment 2). Those results suggest that listeners adjust their temporal-integration intervals according to the demand of the specific task. Finally, the results obtained with the noise signal were analyzed using the multiple-look model and a modified energy-detector model. Assuming that the integration interval is matched to the expected signal duration, both models predict the detection of signals having unexpected durations reasonably well. Both models, however, fail to predict the small effect of duration uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)798-806
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume98
Issue number2 I
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

intervals
Experiment
probes
detectors
energy
Tonal
Energy
Uncertainty
Listeners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Detecting signals of unexpected or uncertain durations. / Dai, Huanping; Wright, B. A.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 98, No. 2 I, 1995, p. 798-806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61ec332e60174d008983bb021944c4e6,
title = "Detecting signals of unexpected or uncertain durations",
abstract = "Expectation of signal duration influences the signal detectability. This is demonstrated in two experiments in which percent correct was measured for both tonal and noise signals whose durations were either unexpected or uncertain. In both experiments, the signal at each duration was set to have a d' of about 1.5 when that duration was presented alone and expected. When the six subjects were led to expect a short- or a long-duration signal using the probe-signal method, the detectability of signals decreased to near chance as the signal duration deviated from the expected value (experiment 1). When the subjects were led to expect a range of durations, the detectability was only slightly worse than when each signal was presented alone (experiment 2). Those results suggest that listeners adjust their temporal-integration intervals according to the demand of the specific task. Finally, the results obtained with the noise signal were analyzed using the multiple-look model and a modified energy-detector model. Assuming that the integration interval is matched to the expected signal duration, both models predict the detection of signals having unexpected durations reasonably well. Both models, however, fail to predict the small effect of duration uncertainty.",
author = "Huanping Dai and Wright, {B. A.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1121/1.413572",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "798--806",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "2 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting signals of unexpected or uncertain durations

AU - Dai, Huanping

AU - Wright, B. A.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Expectation of signal duration influences the signal detectability. This is demonstrated in two experiments in which percent correct was measured for both tonal and noise signals whose durations were either unexpected or uncertain. In both experiments, the signal at each duration was set to have a d' of about 1.5 when that duration was presented alone and expected. When the six subjects were led to expect a short- or a long-duration signal using the probe-signal method, the detectability of signals decreased to near chance as the signal duration deviated from the expected value (experiment 1). When the subjects were led to expect a range of durations, the detectability was only slightly worse than when each signal was presented alone (experiment 2). Those results suggest that listeners adjust their temporal-integration intervals according to the demand of the specific task. Finally, the results obtained with the noise signal were analyzed using the multiple-look model and a modified energy-detector model. Assuming that the integration interval is matched to the expected signal duration, both models predict the detection of signals having unexpected durations reasonably well. Both models, however, fail to predict the small effect of duration uncertainty.

AB - Expectation of signal duration influences the signal detectability. This is demonstrated in two experiments in which percent correct was measured for both tonal and noise signals whose durations were either unexpected or uncertain. In both experiments, the signal at each duration was set to have a d' of about 1.5 when that duration was presented alone and expected. When the six subjects were led to expect a short- or a long-duration signal using the probe-signal method, the detectability of signals decreased to near chance as the signal duration deviated from the expected value (experiment 1). When the subjects were led to expect a range of durations, the detectability was only slightly worse than when each signal was presented alone (experiment 2). Those results suggest that listeners adjust their temporal-integration intervals according to the demand of the specific task. Finally, the results obtained with the noise signal were analyzed using the multiple-look model and a modified energy-detector model. Assuming that the integration interval is matched to the expected signal duration, both models predict the detection of signals having unexpected durations reasonably well. Both models, however, fail to predict the small effect of duration uncertainty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029085859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029085859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.413572

DO - 10.1121/1.413572

M3 - Article

C2 - 7642818

AN - SCOPUS:0029085859

VL - 98

SP - 798

EP - 806

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 2 I

ER -