Detection and quantification of diameter reduction due to corrosion in reinforcing steel bars

Umar Amjad, Susheel Kumar Yadav, Tribikram Kundu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Guided wave–based techniques are becoming popular for damage detection in pipes, rods, and plates. For monitoring reinforced concrete beams, the longitudinal guided wave is excited and recorded after its transmission through the reinforcing steel bar for estimating its corrosion level. Recorded signal amplitude is affected by the corrosion level. Thus, the corrosion level is estimated from the transmitted wave amplitude. Instead of investigating the amplitude of the transmitted guided waves, the differential time-of-flight of the propagating wave modes is recorded in this article. The differential time-of-flight is obtained from the time–frequency representations of the recorded transient signals and from the high temporal resolution using the cross-correlation technique. It is observed that the corrosion level can be quantified from the change in time-of-flight of the L(0,1) mode. The guided wave modes are experimentally generated, recorded, and compared with the theoretical dispersion curves to identify different modes and select the most efficient mode for quantifying the corrosion level. Unlike the recorded signal strength, the time-of-flight is not influenced by the bonding condition between the sensors and the specimen; therefore, the time-of-flight-based corrosion-monitoring technique is less influenced by the sensor bonding condition. This investigation is necessary because most investigators have studied the effect of corrosion on the recorded signal strength instead of its time-of-flight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-543
Number of pages12
JournalStructural Health Monitoring
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 7 2015

Fingerprint

Corrosion
Steel
Guided electromagnetic wave propagation
Monitoring
Damage detection
Sensors
Reinforced concrete
Pipe
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • corrosion
  • dispersion curves
  • Guided wave
  • S-transform
  • short-time Fourier transform
  • steel bars
  • time-of-flight
  • wavelet transform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Detection and quantification of diameter reduction due to corrosion in reinforcing steel bars. / Amjad, Umar; Yadav, Susheel Kumar; Kundu, Tribikram.

In: Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 14, No. 5, 07.09.2015, p. 532-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3782b6644c7141789ae579178282e1eb,
title = "Detection and quantification of diameter reduction due to corrosion in reinforcing steel bars",
abstract = "Guided wave–based techniques are becoming popular for damage detection in pipes, rods, and plates. For monitoring reinforced concrete beams, the longitudinal guided wave is excited and recorded after its transmission through the reinforcing steel bar for estimating its corrosion level. Recorded signal amplitude is affected by the corrosion level. Thus, the corrosion level is estimated from the transmitted wave amplitude. Instead of investigating the amplitude of the transmitted guided waves, the differential time-of-flight of the propagating wave modes is recorded in this article. The differential time-of-flight is obtained from the time–frequency representations of the recorded transient signals and from the high temporal resolution using the cross-correlation technique. It is observed that the corrosion level can be quantified from the change in time-of-flight of the L(0,1) mode. The guided wave modes are experimentally generated, recorded, and compared with the theoretical dispersion curves to identify different modes and select the most efficient mode for quantifying the corrosion level. Unlike the recorded signal strength, the time-of-flight is not influenced by the bonding condition between the sensors and the specimen; therefore, the time-of-flight-based corrosion-monitoring technique is less influenced by the sensor bonding condition. This investigation is necessary because most investigators have studied the effect of corrosion on the recorded signal strength instead of its time-of-flight.",
keywords = "corrosion, dispersion curves, Guided wave, S-transform, short-time Fourier transform, steel bars, time-of-flight, wavelet transform",
author = "Umar Amjad and Yadav, {Susheel Kumar} and Tribikram Kundu",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1475921715578315",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "532--543",
journal = "Structural Health Monitoring",
issn = "1475-9217",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection and quantification of diameter reduction due to corrosion in reinforcing steel bars

AU - Amjad, Umar

AU - Yadav, Susheel Kumar

AU - Kundu, Tribikram

PY - 2015/9/7

Y1 - 2015/9/7

N2 - Guided wave–based techniques are becoming popular for damage detection in pipes, rods, and plates. For monitoring reinforced concrete beams, the longitudinal guided wave is excited and recorded after its transmission through the reinforcing steel bar for estimating its corrosion level. Recorded signal amplitude is affected by the corrosion level. Thus, the corrosion level is estimated from the transmitted wave amplitude. Instead of investigating the amplitude of the transmitted guided waves, the differential time-of-flight of the propagating wave modes is recorded in this article. The differential time-of-flight is obtained from the time–frequency representations of the recorded transient signals and from the high temporal resolution using the cross-correlation technique. It is observed that the corrosion level can be quantified from the change in time-of-flight of the L(0,1) mode. The guided wave modes are experimentally generated, recorded, and compared with the theoretical dispersion curves to identify different modes and select the most efficient mode for quantifying the corrosion level. Unlike the recorded signal strength, the time-of-flight is not influenced by the bonding condition between the sensors and the specimen; therefore, the time-of-flight-based corrosion-monitoring technique is less influenced by the sensor bonding condition. This investigation is necessary because most investigators have studied the effect of corrosion on the recorded signal strength instead of its time-of-flight.

AB - Guided wave–based techniques are becoming popular for damage detection in pipes, rods, and plates. For monitoring reinforced concrete beams, the longitudinal guided wave is excited and recorded after its transmission through the reinforcing steel bar for estimating its corrosion level. Recorded signal amplitude is affected by the corrosion level. Thus, the corrosion level is estimated from the transmitted wave amplitude. Instead of investigating the amplitude of the transmitted guided waves, the differential time-of-flight of the propagating wave modes is recorded in this article. The differential time-of-flight is obtained from the time–frequency representations of the recorded transient signals and from the high temporal resolution using the cross-correlation technique. It is observed that the corrosion level can be quantified from the change in time-of-flight of the L(0,1) mode. The guided wave modes are experimentally generated, recorded, and compared with the theoretical dispersion curves to identify different modes and select the most efficient mode for quantifying the corrosion level. Unlike the recorded signal strength, the time-of-flight is not influenced by the bonding condition between the sensors and the specimen; therefore, the time-of-flight-based corrosion-monitoring technique is less influenced by the sensor bonding condition. This investigation is necessary because most investigators have studied the effect of corrosion on the recorded signal strength instead of its time-of-flight.

KW - corrosion

KW - dispersion curves

KW - Guided wave

KW - S-transform

KW - short-time Fourier transform

KW - steel bars

KW - time-of-flight

KW - wavelet transform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940947882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940947882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1475921715578315

DO - 10.1177/1475921715578315

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 532

EP - 543

JO - Structural Health Monitoring

JF - Structural Health Monitoring

SN - 1475-9217

IS - 5

ER -